The document summarizes different rhetorical appeals that can be used in persuasive writing and speaking. It defines ethos as appealing to the credibility of the source, logos as using logic and facts to support arguments, and pathos as appealing to the emotions of the audience. It also defines kairos as establishing the timeliness of an issue. Examples are provided for each appeal. The document suggests understanding and using these rhetorical appeals can make writing and messages more persuasive.
The document summarizes different rhetorical appeals that can be used in persuasive writing and speaking. It defines ethos as appealing to the credibility of the source, logos as using logic and facts to support arguments, and pathos as appealing to the emotions of the audience. It also defines kairos as establishing the timeliness of an issue. Examples are provided for each appeal. The document suggests understanding and using these rhetorical appeals can make writing and messages more persuasive.
The document summarizes different rhetorical appeals that can be used in persuasive writing and speaking. It defines ethos as appealing to the credibility of the source, logos as using logic and facts to support arguments, and pathos as appealing to the emotions of the audience. It also defines kairos as establishing the timeliness of an issue. Examples are provided for each appeal. The document suggests understanding and using these rhetorical appeals can make writing and messages more persuasive.
The document summarizes different rhetorical appeals that can be used in persuasive writing and speaking. It defines ethos as appealing to the credibility of the source, logos as using logic and facts to support arguments, and pathos as appealing to the emotions of the audience. It also defines kairos as establishing the timeliness of an issue. Examples are provided for each appeal. The document suggests understanding and using these rhetorical appeals can make writing and messages more persuasive.
• Rhetoric (n) - the art of speaking or writing effectively
(Webster's Definition). • According to Aristotle, rhetoric is "the ability, in each particular case, to see the available means of persuasion." He described four main forms of rhetoric: Ethos, Logos, Pathos, and Kairos.
• In order to be a more effective writer, you must understand these
terms. When you better understand their meanings, your writing becomes more persuasive. Ethos: the source's credibility / authority Is the source trustworthy, educated, reliable, credible, honest, fair, and respectable? Examples: Client testimonials Success stories Celebrity endorsements Personal anecdotes • Product: George Foreman Grill • Repertoire: boxing champion and a preacher
Why is George Foreman credible?
Logos: the logic/reasoning used to support a claim; the facts and statistics used to help support the argument Examples: Case studies Cause and effect reasoning Facts and statistics Analogies • Product: Cheerios • Logic: “Lower your cholesterol 4% in 6 weeks!” Pathos: appeals to the audience’s capacity for empathy; wants you to care about the subject matter Typical Emotional Appeals: Love Pity Patriotism Hope Jealousy Anger Fear • Product: Dorothy Gray Salon • Emotional Appeal: jealousy / fear Kairos: establishes the timeliness of the issue; appeals to the viewer’s or reader’s sense of urgency (“it’s the right time to say or do the right thing”) Kairos Factors: Setting Time Place • Speech: “I Have a Dream” by Martin Luther King Jr. • Historical Context and Importance: Together, the “where” (the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C.), the “why” (the culmination of a march on Washington by thousands of members of the civil rights movement), and the “when” (during the centennial celebration of the Emancipation Proclamation, at a time of day when broadcast networks could carry the speech live, and during a march which had drawn more than 250,000 people to the capital) created the perfect moment for King’s message to reach the largest number of receptive listeners. What appeals are being used in the ad above? What appeals are being used in the ad? Is there one that is a stronger approach than the others? Elements of an Argument Rhetorical Appeals • The hook is an opening that grabs the reader’s • Pathos, or emotional appeals, attempt to attention and establishes a connection between persuade the reader or listener by appealing the reader and the writer. to the senses and emotions. • The claim is a clear and straightforward • Ethos are ethical appeals that attempt to statement of the writer’s belief and what is being persuade the reader or listener by focusing argued. on the qualifications or the character of the • Concessions and refutations are restatements of speaker or by claiming that “it” is the ethical arguments made by the other side (concessions) “thing” to do. and the writer’s arguments against those • Logos, or logical appeals, attempt to opposing viewpoints (refutations) and why the persuade readers or listeners by leading writer’s arguments are more valid. them down the road of logic and causing • Support is the reasoning behind the argument. them to come to their own conclusions. Support can include evidence as well as logical Logical appeals state the facts and show how and emotional appeals (logos and pathos). It may the facts are interrelated. also anticipate objections and provide reasoning • Kairos is the attempt to convince the to overcome those objections. audience that the issue is so important that • Summary/Call to action, which is a closing they must act now. statement with a final plea for action. • Repetition: using the same words frequently to emphasize a message or point
• Parallelism: is repetition of the same pattern of words/phrases and
grammatical structure within a sentence or passage to show that two or more ideas have the same level of importance; may create a sense of rhythm and momentum • **All parallelism is repetition, but not all repetition is parallelism!**
• Analogy: a comparison in which the subject is compared point by
point to something far different, usually with the idea of clarifying the subject by comparing it to something familiar