Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Microsoft: Competing On Talent (A)
Microsoft: Competing On Talent (A)
Competing on
Talent (A) LO G O
www.themegallery.com
LOGO Background
1
3 The importance of recruiting well was constantly
reinforced by Gates
www.themegallery.com
LOGO Microsoft Through The 1990s
Steve Ballmer was appointed the President in 1998. Staff strength was then
30000
Ballmer’s first priority was to embark on a series of one-on-one interviews with
a cross-section of 100 employees. He conducted one to one interviews with a
cross section of 100 employees. And concluded that the company needed two
things:
A greater sense of clarity and excitement about the company’s direction, and
More freedom to act without bureaucracy or red tape.
Ballmer’s second priority was to develop leaders capable of clearing the
obstacles, making decision quickly,and defining clear goals.
The first OHI survey in 1998, received a positive response about intent to stay
in company
The OHI result was the focus of of vice presidents’ first slide in their annual
meeting business review.
LOGO Development in the 1990s
“Microsofties wear golden handcuffs. They are the stock options that vest
each year”. 10000 current Microsoft employees had option worth more
than $1 million.
Around 1994, Doug McKenna, head of Executive and Management
Development, set out to identify the core skills, capabilities and values
that were clear to old-timers and those at the top, but less visible to
newcomers or those deeper in the organization
HR specialist asked 50 long-time senior executives to describe what mae
Microsoft successful. From this process, six “success factors” was taking a
long term approach to people and technology; getting results; individual
excellence; a passion for products and technology; customer feedback;
and teamwork. Some were widely understood; but the last two were
more recently emphasized values
LOGO
Cont’
From these six core values, McKenna and his team developed
29 individual competencies required for successful
implementation, which described at four different level of
performance.
Salary was moved from 50th percentile of the industry to
65th percentile. The number of non executive ladder levels
were increased from 12 to 22 to reward high performers
more frequently with promotions.
Protecting the Past, Building the Future
LOGO
LOGO
Click to edit subtitle style
LO G O
www.themegallery.com