Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amr Optimization Guidelines
Amr Optimization Guidelines
GUIDELINES
Topics
› AMR Overview
› With the introduction of AMR the GSM operator has available on the air interface:
› The reason of the 14 different Channel Coding is to use in every moment of the
conversation the best trade off between Channel Coding and Speech Coding.
› With AMR, the speech capacity is increased by using the half rate (HR)
mode and still maintaining the quality level of current FR calls.
› The idea behind the AMR codec concept is that it is capable of adapting its
operation optimally according to the prevailing channel conditions.
25
Channel bit-rate (kbit/s)
Channel coding
20 Speech coding
15
Robustness
10
5
Speech Qual
0
FR FR FR FR 7.4 FR 6.7 FR 5.9 FR FR HR HR 7.4 HR 6.7 HR 5.9 HR HR
12.2 10.2 7.95 5.15 4.75 7.95 5.15 4.75
In high-error conditions more bits are used for error correction to obtain error robust coding,
while in good transmission conditions a lower amount of bits is needed for sufficient error
protection and more bits can therefore be allocated for source coding
› The basic AMR codec mode sets for MS and BTS are provided by BSC via layer 3
signaling
› Both the MS and the network implement their own independent LA algorithms
– ETSI specified fast LA Inband codec mode changes on every other TCH frame = 40
msec
– Nokia proprietary slow LA Changes only every SACCH frame interval = 480 msec
›2.-Request a
codec for DL
›2.-Command a
UL LA codec for UL
›1.-Which UL
radio
conditions?
› 3.-MS uses the
codec commanded
by the network for UL
CMI, C
CMR, MC
CMI
DL SF 1 SF 3
CMC SF 5 CMCSF 7 CMC
SF 9
CMC CMC CMC CMC CMC CMC
– Quality -> AMR maintains good speech quality in the situation where the
connection faces low C/I or low signal level. Also due to retransmissions
schemes used by these channels the probability of signaling success maintain
very high even for very degraded conditions
– Capacity -> HR utilization doubles the hardware capacity of the cell since two
half-rate connections can be allocated to fill only one timeslot. Practically the
gain is up to 150% higher capacity for the same quality
– Coverage -> additional 3-4 dB effective coverage
– Cost (HR hardware efficiency) -> 20-40% lower number of TRXs
– Improved BCCH plan: tighter frequency reuse or better quality with same
frequency reuse, potentially releasing frequencies to be used on the non-BCCH
layer
Average FER
%
15
20%
15% 10
10%
5
5%
0%
0
RXQUAL0 RXQUAL1 RXQUAL2 RXQUAL3 RXQUAL4 RXQUAL5 RXQUAL6 RXQUAL7
RXQUAL1 RXQUAL2 RXQUAL3 RXQUAL4 RXQUAL5 RXQUAL6 RXQUAL7
(TEMS) Distribution of FER in 2sec per RXQUAL class for AMR-HR AHS4.75-AHS7.4 16dB and 3dB Hyst
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00% RXQual 1
RXQual 2
60.00%
RXQual 3
50.00% RXQual 4
40.00% RXQual 5
RXQual 6
30.00%
RXQual 7
20.00%
10.00%
.00% 10% of samples
RXQ
RXQ
ual 6
ual 7 having worse than
FE
R
RXQ
RXQ
ual 5 4% FER WITH
>0
% ER ual 4
>2
%F
FE
R RXQ
ual 3 RXQual 5
% R RXQ
>4 FE ual 2
8 % R RXQ
> FE ual 1
2%
>1