Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lean Production: Week 6: Cellular Manufacturing
Lean Production: Week 6: Cellular Manufacturing
Week 6:
Cellular Manufacturing
Tran Van Ly
Industrial Engineering & Management
International University
Email: tvly@hcmiu.edu.vn
Room: A2-504 1
Recall previous week
Increased flexibility – much easier to slot in that
urgent order or to service multiple customers or
part numbers
Reduced batch sizes – Shorter setup times allow
running smaller batches more often
one-piece flow
Reduced stock and WIP (Work in Progress)
2
Recall previous week
Improved quality, reduced waste as less
adjustment, problems in small batch
# of cycle/day;
Production quantity/cycle
Batch sizes
Sequencing model
4
Recall previous week
5
Learning Objectives
6
One Piece Flow
One Piece Flow
between steps
One-piece flow promote continuous flow of
products, with the least amount of delay and
waiting
One-Piece Flow Vs. Large-Lot
Lead time? Required resource for storage &
transportation? Quality control?
Islands
Connected islands
PROCESSES OPERATIONS
a continuous flow through which raw An operation is any action
materials are converted into finished performed by workers or
products in a series of operations. machines on the materials.
The focus is the path of the materials focuses on action.
as they are transformed into something
to sell.
Manufacturing processes have four Operational improvements
basic types of steps or phases: focus on how specific actions
Transformation – assembly,
are carried out, and include
machining studying the motions required
Inspection – comparison to standard for a specific action.
Transport – change of location
Job shop
Process layout
In
Flow shop/Product
layout
Out
Comparison of Product
and Process Layouts
Note Product Process
Description
Description Sequential Functional
arrangement of grouping of
activities activities
Continuous, mass Intermittent, job
Type
Type of
of process
process
production, mainly shop, batch
assembly production, mainly
fabrication
Product
Product Standardized, made Varied, made to
to stock order
Demand
Demand Stable Fluctuating
Volume
Volume High Low
Equipment
Equipment Special purpose General purpose
Comparison of Product
and Process Layouts
Note Product Process
Workers
Workers Limited skills Varied skills
Inventory
Inventory Low in-process, High in-process, low
high finished goods finished goods
Storage
Storage space
space Small Large
Material
Material handling
handling
Aisles
Fixed path Variable path
Aisles
Scheduling
Scheduling
(conveyor) (forklift)
Layout
Layout decision
decision
Narrow Wide
Goal
Goal Part of balancing Dynamic
Line balancing Machine location
Advantage
Advantage Equalize work at Minimize material
each station handling cost
Efficiency Flexibility
Layout design
Cycle time is
adjusted to match
takt time by
changing worker
paths
CMS and Group Technology
CMS layout are based on recognizing similarities in
products – similarities in geometry, size, materials and
processing requirements
This similar products are collected – “Grouped”
instead of being treated as individuals
Leads to product families that visit similar equipment
and populate their ‘cells’ production schedule
Simpler setups like in a Job shop can follow and the
workers become multifunctional and responsible for all
aspects of a product – and its quality
Cells can be scheduled to produce synchronously
bringing the various sub-assemblies in as needed at
final assembly with greater variety built in
High-Variety Production
Assembly
4 6 7 9
5 8
2 10 12
1 3 11
A B C Raw materials
7-23
Part Routing Matrix
Identify families of parts with similar flow paths
Machines
Parts 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A x x x x x
B x x x x
C x x x
D x x x x x
E x x x
F x x x
G x x x x
H x x x
Reordered Routing Matrix
Group machines into cells based on part families
Machines
Parts 1 2 4 8 10 3 6 9 5 7 11 12
A x x x x x
D x x x x x
F x x x
C x x x
G x x x x
B x x x x
H x x x
E x x x
Revised Cellular Layout
Arrange cells so material movement is minimized
Assembly
8 10 9 12
11
4 Cell 1 Cell 2 6 Cell 3
7
2 1 3 5
A C B
Raw materials
Example
Multi-Functional Workers, and Job
Rotation
Locate large shared machines at point of use
Layout design
Combined U-form line
Production balancing WIP
Mutual relief movement
Reallocation of operations
Efficiency of Line
Minimum number
Efficiency
of workstations
j j
t i t i
E = nC
i=1
N= i=1
Cd
a
where
ti = completion time for element i
j = number of work elements
n = actual number of workstations
Ca = actual cycle time
Cd = desired cycle time (takt time)
Guideline for determining # of
operator in the cell
Remainder in # operators Guideline
required calculation
< 0.3 Do not add extra operator. Further reduce
wastes in incidental work
0.3-0.5 Do not add extra operator yet. Wait after 2
weeks of operation and kaizen
>0.5 Add extra operator if necessary
Line Balancing Procedure
1. Draw and label a precedence diagram
2. Calculate desired cycle time (takt time) required for line
3. Calculate theoretical minimum number of workstations
4. Group elements into workstations, recognizing cycle
time and precedence constraints
5. Calculate efficiency of line
6. Determine if theoretical minimum number of
workstations or an acceptable efficiency level has been
reached. If not, go back to step 4.
Line Balancing: Example
D E