Pertemuan 4: Observation Studies

You might also like

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 26

Pertemuan 4:

Observation Studies
Learning Objectives
Understand . . .
• When observation studies are most useful.
• Distinctions between monitoring. nonbehavioral and
behavioral activities
• Strengths of the observation approach in research
design.
• Weaknesses of the observation approach in research
design.

8-2
Learning Objectives
Understand . . .
• Three perspectives from which the observer-
participant relationship may be viewed.
• Various designs of observation studies.

8-3
Observation and the Research Process

8-4
Selecting the Data Collection Method

8-5
Selecting an Observation
Data Collection Approach

8-6
Research Design
Who?

What?
What?
Where?
Where? (event
(event or
or time)
time)
Task
Task Details
Details

How?
How? When?

8-7
Content of Observation
Factual Inferential
Introduction/identification of salesperson and Credibility of salesperson. Qualified status of
customer. customer.
Time and day of week. Convenience for the customer. Welcoming attitude
of the customer
Product presented. Customer interest in product.

Selling points presented per product. Customer acceptance of selling points of product.

Number of customer objections raised per product. Customer concerns about features and benefits.

Salesperson’s rebuttal of objection. Effectiveness of salesperson’s rebuttal attempts.

Salesperson’s attempt to restore controls. Effectiveness of salesperson’s control attempt.


Consequences for customer who prefers interaction.
Length of interview. Customer’s/salesperson’s degree of enthusiasm for
the interview.

Environmental factors interfering with the interview. Level of distraction for the customer.

Customer purchase decision. General evaluation of sale presentation skill.


8-8
Data Collection

Watching
Watching

Listening
Listening

Touching
Touching

Smelling
Smelling

Reading
Reading
8-9
Using Observation

Systematic
Systematic planning
planning

Properly
Properly controlled
controlled

Consistently
Consistently dependable
dependable

Accurate
Accurate account
account of
of events
events

8-10
Observation Classification
Nonbehavioral Behavioral
• Physical condition • Nonverbal
analysis • Linguistic
• Process or Activity • Extralinguistic
analysis
• Spatial
• Record analysis

8-11
Selecting an Observation Data Collection Approach . .
.Nonbehavioral

8-12
Nonbehavioral Observation

Record
Analysis

Physical Condition
Analysis

Physical Process
Analysis
8-13
Selecting an Observation
Data Collection Approach…Behavioral

8-14
8-15

Behavioral Observation
• “We noticed people scraping
the toppings off our pizza
crusts. We thought at first there
was something wrong, but they
said, ‘We love it, we just don’t
eat the crust anymore.”
• Tom Santor, Donatos Pizza
Systematic Observation
Standardized
procedures

Structured
Structured Trained
Trained
observers
observers
Systematic
Systematic
Encoding
Encoding
observation
Recording
observation
information
information
schedules

8-16
Flowchart for Checklist Design

8-17
Mechanical/ Digital Behavioral Observation

Video camera

Pupilometer
Pupilometer Audio
Audio recorder
recorder

Devices
Devices
Eye
Eye camera
camera Tachistoscope
Tachistoscope

Galvanometer
8-18
SizeUSA

Body Measurement System

8-19
Portable People Meters

8-20
Observer-Participant Relationship

Direct or indirect
observation

Presence is known
or unknown

Observer involved or
not involved in events

8-21
Extralinguistic Observation

Vocal

Temporal

Interaction

Verbal Stylistic

8-22
8-23

Desired Characteristics for Observers

Concentration

Detail-oriented

Unobtrusive

Experience level
Errors Introduced by Observers

Halo Effect Observer Drift

8-24
Evaluation of
Behavioral Observation
Strengths Weaknesses
• Securing information that is • Enduring long periods
otherwise unavailable • Incurring higher expenses
• Avoiding participant • Having lower reliability of
filtering/ forgetting inferences
• Securing environmental • Quantifying data
context
• Keeping large records
• Optimizing naturalness
• Being limited on knowledge
• Reducing obtrusiveness of cognitive processes

8-25
Tugas
Bacalah artikel Li, L. P., Juric, B., & Brodie, R. J. (2017).
Dynamic multi-actor engagement in networks: the case of
United Breaks Guitars. Journal of Service Theory and
Practice, dan diskusikan pertanyaan-pertanyaan berikut
ini dalam kelompok:
•Apa permasalahan manajerial dan pertanyaan penelitian
yang ingin dijawab? 
•Bagaimana cara artikel tersebut menjawab pertanyaan
penelitian tersebut?
•Apa kesimpulan yang anda peroleh setelah membaca
artikel jurnal tersebut?

8-26

You might also like