Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Enhancing Music Teachers' Competencies in Primary Level
Enhancing Music Teachers' Competencies in Primary Level
Enhancing Music Teachers' Competencies in Primary Level
Graduate School
Caloocan
(Odunuga, 2015)
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
• RESEARCH DESIGN
As defined by de Belen (2015) descriptive research is a method of research that seeks and
describes something out there such as status , condition or experience of a subject. Its focus is on the
estimation rather than testing or confirming a hypothesis because it basically aims to describe “ what
is”.
Calderon and Gonzales (2007) added that descriptive method is concerned with the conditions of
relationships that exist practices that prevail, belief, processes that are going on, effects that are being
felt or trends that are developing. The process of descriptive research goes beyond mere gathering and
tabulation of data. It involves that elements or interpretation of the meaning or significance of what is
interpreted. Thus description is often combined with comparison and contrast involving measurements,
classification, interpretation and evaluation.
The researcher deemed that descriptive method is the most appropriate method for this study
because it specifically describes the current knowledge and practices of music education instruction
that is vital for the creation of training program that may enhance the Music Education curriculum.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
• POPULATION AND SAMPLE
The teacher-respondents were 80 primary teachers from selected elementary schools
of Caloocan North 1 District. Twenty (20) teacher-respondents from three elementary
schools in CND 1 which are considered as large schools namely Camarin D Elementary
School, Camarin Main Elementary School and Caloocan North Elementary School while
Ten (10) teacher-respondents from small schools namely Camarin D Annex II Elementary
School and Horacio Dela Costa Elementary School will also be part of the teacher
respondents to equate the results.
The researcher adapted the purposive sampling technique where the samples are
selected based on the decision or judgment of the researcher on who are best qualified to
answer the objectives of the study. Hence, the researcher identified the prospective
people who were targeted to be involved in the study.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
• Research instrument
To gather the needed data, the following instruments were used
Data Analysis. The questionnaire result from teachers and the data gathered through
interview of the teachers were used to identify the challenges and difficulties of primary
teachers in teaching music.
Questionnaire. It is the primary source of data. It contains statement concerning the
problems stated in Chapter 1. The respondents ranked the statements based on the
perception/ knowledge regarding the subject.
Interview. This is the secondary source of data. The interview was conducted personally
by the researcher through the focus group discussion particularly teachers handling
MAPEH in primary level.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY
• Data gathering procedure
Prior to the distribution of questionnaires, the researcher will ask permission from the
Schools Division Superintendent of Caloocan City for the administration of the instrument
to the study. Upon the approval of request, the letter will be forwarded to the school head
to make arrangement and approval regarding interviews and survey then researcher
would undergo the process to the different schools of Caloocan North 1 District.
• Statistical treatment of data
Percentage. This will be used for demographic details of primary teachers
Weighted Mean and Descriptive Ratings. This will be used to analyze the status of primary
teachers in teaching music in terms of knowledge , skill and attitude and the challenges encountered.
The listed scale will be used to measure the status of music teachers’ competencies and challenges
in teaching music in primary level.
Scale Level Descriptive Rating (SOP No.2)
4 3.26-4.00 Highly Competent (HC)
3 2.51-3.25 Competent
2 1.76- 2.50 Less Competent (LC)
1 1.00-1.75 Not Competent at all (NC)
Scale Level Descriptive Rating (SOP No.4)
4 3.26-4.00 Always Encountered (AO)
3 2.51-3.25 Oftentimes Encountered (OE)
2 1.76- 2.50 Sometimes Encountered (SE)
1 1.00-1.75 Not Encountered (NE)