Professional Documents
Culture Documents
American Religion Tpma
American Religion Tpma
Spirituality has been posited as an important protective factor against suicidality for
Native Americans (Alcantara and Gone 2007; Garoutte et al. 2003). Commitment to
cultural spirituality has been shown to decrease the risk of attempted suicide (Garoutte
et al. 2003). Even after controlling for age, gender, level of education, alcohol/substance
abuse, and psychological impairment, Native Americans with a higher cultural/spiritual
orientation had a decreased prevalence of suicide when compared to those with lower
cultural spiritual orientation. Furthermore, having positive relationships with tribal leaders
has consistently been shown to be a protective effect against suicidality among Native
Americans (Alcantara and Gone 2007; Borowsky et al. 1999). Additionally, attention and
caring from one’s family, adults or tribal leaders, parental expectations and positive
feelings toward school have been found to be protective factors against suicidality for
female Native American youth (Pharris et al. 1997). Among male Native American youth,
involvement in traditional activities, school enjoyment, academic performance, and caring
exhibited by family members, adults, and/or tribal leaders were identified as protective
factors against suicide (Pharris et al. 1997).
Native American Religions and Suicide
As radical activists and philosophers begin to articulate and implement their ideas for a truly
ecological world, they find themselves drawn, again and again. to the beliefs and traditions of
North America's Native Americans. t0 Native Americans are often portrayed as model
ecological citizens, holding values and beliefs that industrialized humans have long since
sacrificed in the pursuit of progress and comfort. This interest in Native American
relationships with the natural world has an old history. As Cornell points out, influential
members of the early American conservation movement were deeply impressed by Native i
Americans and their knowledge of and relations with the natural world. 'I Such interest is
shared even by less radical elements in the environmentall movement .
Native American Beliefs
• Native American statements about the integrity and inherent importance of the natural world, such as
those of Luther Standing Bear, stir many Western people, but there seems to be surprisingly lite
understanding of Native Americans' actual relationships with their environment. Even so, this does not
keep elements of the environmental movement, mainstream and radical, recent and historical, from
using Native Americans for their own ends. In this article we attempt to redress this situation by offering
a synthetic, detailed discussion of Native American beliefs and relationships with the natural world as
presented by Native Americans and by anthropologists and historians. As such, we take a broad i
approach to the nature of Native American culture, addressing it as a singulari phenomenon. Although
we are aware of the significant differences among Native American cultures, as we argue in the next
section, there is enough similarity in environmental views to warrant this type of cross-cutting
approach. More dei tailed descriptions of the works used here are available in a recent annotatedi
bibliography. It is our hope that this article will help the environmentali movement develop an empathic
and analytic understanding of traditions that they now use so loosely.
Native American Beliefs
• Although they varied significantly between different cultures, Native Amer-i ican relationships with the natural
world tended to prescrve biological integrity within natural communities, and did so over a significant period of
historicall time. These cultures engaged in relationships of mutual respect, reciprocity, andi caring with an Earth
and fellow beings as alive and seli-conscious as humani beings. Such relationships were rellected and
perpetuated by cutural elements including religious belief and ceremonial ritual. We do not claim that natural
communities remained unchanged by human i activities, for they did change, considerably so, and in some
instances, negative-i ly so. However. the great majority of natural communities remained ecologically functional
while supporting both Native American cultures and a great diversity of different plant and animal species.In
contrast. invading Europeans brought with them cultures that practicedi relationships of subjugation and
domination, even hatred, of European lands. i They made little attempt to live with their natural communities. but
rather alteredi them wholesale. The impoverishment of the ecological communities of sixteenth and
seventeenth-century Europe was so great that, in contrast, cearly settlers of the New World found either a
marvelous paradise or a horrendous wilderness, but certainly something completely outside their
experience.sNative American cultures had adapted their needs to the capacities of naturall communities: the
new inhabitants, freshly out of Europe, adapted natural com-i munities to meet their needs. The differences
between these two approaches havei had profound impacts on the diversity and functioning of natural
communities in North America.
References