Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presented by Edwin Manikai & Chipo Sachikonye
Presented by Edwin Manikai & Chipo Sachikonye
Presented by Edwin Manikai & Chipo Sachikonye
PART I
ZIMBABWE INVESTMENT AUTHORITY
3
INVESTMENT
Zimbabwe Investment Authority Act [Chapter 14:30]
(“the ZIA Act”) is the enabling legislation as it pertains to
foreign investment.
Section 13
“Any person who wishes:-
(a) to obtain the approval of the Authority to invest in
Zimbabwe; or
(b) his or her business activity to be approved by the
Authority as a foreign investment;
Shall submit an application to the Authority for an
investment licence with such application accompanies by
a prescribed fee.
Standard documentation to accompany a ZIA application:-
Three year financial forecast of the project;
Proof of funds;
Business plan;
Environmental impact assessment report (if in mining);
Cv of each director ;
Details of shareholding of the company etc
Fee is US$1000.00 on submission of the application and
US$2 000 on approval of the investment and processing
of the licence.
15
EXCHANGE CONTROL
Exchange Control Act
The ELCC derives its powers from the Reserve Bank Act,
Exchange Control Act and the State Loans and Guarantee
Act.
All external loan and commercial credit proposals
regardless of the amount – for both private sector and
parastatals shall be subject to ELCC approval.
30
INDIGENISATION
32
THE ACT
• Definitions which are key to the interpretation of the Act are:-
• A company, means the majority of the voting rights attaching to all classes of shares in
the company;
• Any business other than a company, means any interest which enables the holder thereof
to exercise, directly or indirectly, any control whatsoever over the activities or assets of
the business;
33
“empowerment” means the creation of an environment which enhances
the performance of the economic activities of indigenous Zimbabweans
into which they would have been introduced or involved through
indigenization;
34
THE POLICY
• The over-arching principle of the Act is contained in section 3 of the
Act which deals with the “objectives and measures in pursuance of
indigenisation and economic empowerment”
• Section 3(1) provides:-
• “the Government shall, through this Act or regulations or other
measures under this Act or any other law, endeavor to secure that:-
In terms of section 3 (1) (a):-
• at least 51% of the shares of every public company and any other
business shall be owned by indigenous Zimbabweans;
35
In terms of section 3 (1) (b)
no-
(i) merger or restructuring of the shareholding of 2 or more related or
associated businesses; or
(ii) acquisition by a person of a controlling interest in a business;
that requires to be notified to the Competition Commission in terms of
Part IVA of the Competition Act [Chapter 14:28] shall be approved
unless:–
(iii) 51% (or such lesser share as may be temporarily prescribed for the
purpose of subsection (5)) in the merged or restructured business is held
by indigenous Zimbabweans; and
(iv) the indigenous Zimbabweans referred to in subparagraph (iii) are
equitably represented in the governing body of the merges or
restructured entity.”
36
• 3 (1) (d) “no relinquishment by a person of a controlling
interest in a business, if the value of the controlling interest is
at or above a prescribed threshold, shall be approved unless
the controlling interest (or such lesser share thereof as may
be temporarily prescribed for the purposes of subsection (5) is
relinquished to indigenous Zimbabweans; (our emphasis)
37
• In terms of section 5 the Minister can exercise his
discretion and allow the “non-compliance” by the non-
indigenous entity, but only for a specified time period:-
38
CONSIDERATIONS OTHER
THAN SHAREHOLDING
• In terms of the Regulations, when assessing indigenisation
compliance, the Minister can give a company credits towards
meeting their indigenisation quotas for socially and
economically desirable objectives. Further, the Minister can
approve a threshold of less than 51% or extend the period for
compliance beyond 5 years on good and sufficient cause being
established that there exist other socially and economically
desirable objectives.
40
THE REGULATIONS
• The Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment (General)
Regulations, 2010, Statutory Instrument 21 of 2010, (S.I. 21 of
2010) as read together with the amendment to the regulations
Statutory Instrument 116 of 2010 (S.I. 116 of 2010) (together
“the Regulations”) deal with the implementation of the
provisions of the Act. Definitions which are relevant for the
purposes of interpretation of the regulations are:-
“indigenisation plan” means a written proposal to
the Minister on how and when 51% or a controlling
interest in any business shall fall under the control of
the indigenous Zimbabweans;
41
“minimum indigenisation and empowerment quota” means a
controlling interest or the 51% of the shares or interests which in
terms of the Act is required to be held by indigenous Zimbabweans
in a business pursuant to any transaction referred to in sections
three, four, six, seven (1) nine and 11;
42
“management share ownership scheme or trust”
means an arrangement the dominant purpose or
effect of which is to enable the managerial
employees of a company or group of companies to
participate in or receive profits or income arising
from the acquisition, holding, a management or
disposal of the stock, shares or debentures of the
company or group of companies concerned:
43
• Any person who is the principal executive officer, corporate
secretary, chief financial officer or human resources
manager of a business, by whatever title he or she may be
designated and whether or not, in the case of a company, he
or she is a director;
44
“net asset value” in relation to the net asset value of a business,
means its net worth, that is to say the total value of its fixed assets
and other assets less the total value of its liabilities;
45
• A key amendment was the replacement of the word “cede”
with the word “dispose of”. The Act therefore now
contemplates a transfer of shares for value, rather than a
disposal for no value. The words “dispose of” are in turn
defined to mean to “sell, donate or otherwise dispose” in
section 2 of SI 116 of 2010.
“in relation to the net asset value of a business, means its net
worth, that is to say, the total of its fixed assets and other
assets less the total value of its liabilities”.
46
EMPLOYEE SHARE OWNERSHIP
SCHEMES OF TRUST
• Section 14 of the Indigenisation Regulations deal with
employee share ownership schemes. Section 14(1)
provides the following:-
47
• In terms of section 14(2) to 14(5) of the Regulations:
“(2) a qualifying scheme or trust under this section shall –
not benefit managerial employees to an extent exceeding five
per centum of the shares or interests pooled in the employee
share ownership scheme or trust; and
48
COMMUNITY SHARE
OWNERSHIOP SCHEMES
• Section 14B (1) refers to community share ownership schemes,
this scheme is defined as follows:-
“community” means-
49
The residents of one or more wards of a Rural District
Council specified in a community share ownership scheme
whose natural resources are being exploited by a qualifying
business; or
50
–
natural resources”, include-
“
51
any landscape, scenery or site having aesthetic appeal or scenic
value or of historic or archaeological interest;
“qualifying business” means a company engaged in
exploiting the natural resources of any community;
52
• A community share ownership scheme or trust that complies with
this section may be taken into consideration when assessing the
extent to which a business has achieved or exceeded the
minimum indigenization and empowerment quota.
53
• in the case where the beneficiary community are the residents of
one or more wards of a Rural District Council, the manner of
appointment of the trustee or trustees who will hold the shares or
interest in the qualifying business on behalf of the community (the
actual percentage of which shares or interest shall be added
towards the fulfilment of the minimum indigenization and
empowerment quota) shall be as agreed between the Rural District
Council concerned and the qualifying business; or
54
• An owner of a business wishing to use the qualifying scheme or
trust for the purpose of this section shall submit to the Minister
Form IDG 04 together with a copy of the Deed of Trust of the
qualifying scheme or trust.
• Provided that, in considering whether a community share
ownership scheme or trust set up for the benefit of a community
referred to in subsection (3) (a) or (b) should be accepted as a
qualifying scheme or trust, the Minister shall have regard to
whether the scheme or trust provides that the monies accruing to
the scheme or trust will be applied to any or all of the following
purposes-
• the provision, operation and maintenance of –
• schools and other education institutions and facilities and
amenities connected therewith, and educational scholarships; and
55
hospitals, clinics and dispensaries; and
56
• All dividends or other monies accruing to the beneficiaries by virtue of a
community share ownership scheme or trust in terms of this section shall-
• in the case of a community referred to in subsection (3)(a) or (b), be
recorded in separate account of the Rural District Council concerned, as
will ensure that the amount of such dividends or other monies may be
ascertained separately from any other revenue accruing to the Rural
District Council;
57
ASSESSMENT
• Assessment for compliance with indigenisation laws is done on a yearly
basis. The company is obliged to complete and submit the Form IGD 03
and submit same to the Minister. These forms are completed and submitted
to the Minister, upon his making a notice in the Government Gazette that
businesses submit their indigenisation and empowerment ratings.
58
That he or she or any person in respect of whom he or she furnishes
the said information is an indigenous Zimbabwean;
The extent to which any ownership interest is held by indigenous
Zimbabweans; or
That he or she is owner of any shares or other interest in a business,
knowing that he or she is merely the nominee of the beneficial owner
who is not indigenous Zimbabwean;
59
PART IV
COMPETITION AND TARIFF COMMISSION
60
The key question to ask on a transaction is whether or not the transaction
requires notification and approval of the Competition and Tariff
Commission (“the Competition Commission” or “CTC”) and whether or
not the transaction will result in a monopoly situation, requiring the
approval of the Competition Commission.
61
“controlling interest ”, in relation to—
(a) any undertaking, means any interest which enables the holder
thereof to exercise, directly or indirectly, any control whatsoever over
the activities or assets of the undertaking;
(b) any asset, means any interest which enables the holder thereof to
exercise, directly or indirectly, any control whatsoever over the
asset;”
“ merger ” means the direct or indirect acquisition or establishment
of a controlling interest by one or more persons in the whole or part
of the business of a competitor, supplier, customer or other person
whether that controlling interest is achieved as a result of—
(a) the purchase or lease of the shares or assets of a competitor,
supplier, customer or other person;
(b) the amalgamation or combination with a competitor, supplier,
customer or other person; or
(c) any means other than as specified in paragraph (a) or (b); and
62
“monopoly situation” means a situation in which a single person exercises,
or two or more persons with a substantial economic connection exercise,
substantial market control over any commodity or service;
Section 34 A of the Competition Act provides the following with regards to
Notifiable Mergers
“(1) A party to a notifiable merger shall notify the Commission in writing
of the proposed merger within 30 days of—
(a) the conclusion of the merger agreement between the merging parties;
or
(b) the acquisition by any 1 of the parties to that merger of a controlling
interest in another.”
63
Notification to the commission is effected by completing a Merger and
Notification Form, which form must be accompanied by the
prescribed fee in terms of section 34A (2).
64
A penalty imposed in terms of section 34A (3) may not exceed 10%
of either or both of the merging parties’ annual turnover in Zimbabwe
as reflected in the accounts of any party concerned for the preceding
financial year.
65
(c) the behaviour of the parties concerned; and
(d) the market circumstances in which the contravention took place;
and
(e) the level of profit derived from the contravention; and
(f) the degree to which the parties have co-operated with the
Commission ; and
(g) whether the parties have previously been found in contravention
of this Act.”
66
In terms of section 34A (6) civil proceedings for the recovery of any
penalty imposed in terms of subsection (3) may be brought against the
party or parties concerned by the Competition Commission.
Monopoly Situations
Section 28 of the Competition Act gives the Competition Commission
the power to make such investigation as it considers necessary into any
monopoly situation which the Competition Commission has reason to
believe exists or may come into existence.
67
In terms of section 30 of the Competition Act, the Competition Commission
may at any time (whether or not it has actually embarked on an
investigation into the restrictive practice, merger or monopoly situation)
negotiate with any person with a view to making an arrangement which
will:-
68
Section 31 (2) provides that if the Competition Commission is satisfied, that
any actual or proposed merger or monopoly situation is or will be contrary
to the public interest, the Competition Commission may make any one or
more of the following orders in respect of that merger or monopoly
situation:-
69
(b) in the case of a monopoly situation, requiring any person who exercises
control over the business or economic activity concerned to take such steps
as are specified in the order to terminate the monopoly situation within
such time as is specified in the order;
(c) prohibiting or restricting the acquisition by any person named in the
order of the whole or part of any undertaking or assets, or the doing by that
person of anything which will or may result in such an acquisition, if the
acquisition is likely, in the Commission’s opinion, to lead to a merger or
monopoly situation;
(d) requiring any person to take steps to secure the dissolution of any
organization, whether corporate or unincorporated, or the termination of
any association, where the Commission is satisfied that the person is
concerned in or a party to the merger or monopoly situation;
70
(e) requiring that, if any merger takes place or any monopoly
situation exists, any party thereto who is named in the order shall
observe such prohibitions or restrictions in regard to the manner in
which he carries on business as are specified in the order;
71
An order made in respect of a merger or monopoly situation may provide
for the following in terms of section 31 (3):-
“(a) the transfer or vesting of property, rights, liabilities or obligations;
(b) the adjustment of contracts, whether by their discharge or the reduction
of any liability or obligation or otherwise;
(c) the creation, allotment, surrender or cancellation of any shares, stocks
or securities;
(d) the formation or winding up of any undertaking or the amendment of
the memorandum or articles of association or any other instrument
regulating the business of any undertaking.”
72
In terms of section 32 the Competition Commission when determining
whether or not a monopoly situation will be contrary to the public interest
shall have regard to the desirability of :-
73
In terms of section 32 (5) the Competition Commission shall regard a
monopoly situation as contrary to the public interest unless the Competition
Commission is satisfied as to any one or more of the following :-
“(a) that the monopoly situation, through economies of scale or for other
reasons, has resulted in or is likely to result in a more efficient use of
resources in any business, trade or industry than would be the case if the
monopoly situation did not exist;
(b) that the monopoly situation is or is likely to be necessary for the
production, supply or distribution of any commodity or service in
Zimbabwe, regard being had on the one hand to the resources necessary to
produce, supply or distribute the commodity or service and, on the other
hand, to the size of the Zimbabwean market for that commodity or service;
74
that termination or prevention of the monopoly situation would deny to
consumers or users of any commodity or service, other specific and
substantial benefits or advantages enjoyed or likely to be enjoyed by
them, whether by virtue of the monopoly situation itself or by virtue of
any arrangement or operation resulting therefrom;
(d) that the monopoly situation is or is likely to be reasonably
necessary to enable the parties to it to negotiate fair terms for the
distribution of a commodity or service—
(i) from a person who is not a party to the monopoly situation and
who exercises complete or, substantial control over the distribution of
the commodity or service or
75
(ii) to a person who is not a party to the monopoly situation and who
exercises complete or substantial control over the market for the commodity
or service;
(e) that termination or prevention of the monopoly situation would be
likely to have a serious and persistently adverse effect on the general level
of unemployment in any area in which a substantial proportion of the
business, trade or industry to which the monopoly situation relates is
situated;
(f) that termination or prevention of the monopoly situation would be
likely to cause a substantial reduction in the volume or earnings of any
export business or trade of Zimbabwe.”
76
QUESTIONS
77
CONCLUSION
&
THE END
78