Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IR-1 Intrduction
IR-1 Intrduction
RELATIONS
INTRODUCTION
International Relations & the State
International Relations arises from the vital principle of the state. The
modern state system has been in existence since 1648. The dominant model
of the global system continues to hold the view that the world is composed of
a system of sovereign states.
State:
Territory
Human Population
An Effective Central Government, and
Sovereignty.
COUNTRY: territorial unit
emotional attachment to place;
territorial imperative;
my country right or wrong;
patriotism and nationalism
International Relations & the State
NATION: cultural emphasis;
from clan to tribe to nation,
common language, religion, history; nationalism.
Nationalism is an ideology. Many consider it the most powerful of the 19th, 20th,
and 21st centuries. It had its origins in the French Revolution. At first nationalism
was linked to liberalism and democratic ideals (the nation is the people), later, by the
1860s, it was linked to conservative, monarchical, militaristic, and imperialistic
values.
NATION-STATE: refers to a state where a single nationality group is
predominant. In the 19th century, the view grew that only nation-states were
legitimate. Multinational states were likely to split apart when nationalistic
sentiments grew among the different segments of the population. At the end
of World War I, the Austro-Hungarian Empire split into several nation-states.
Nationalism was an underlying cause for the dissolution of the Soviet Union
in 1991.
International Relations & the State
The most important actors within the global system continue to be the
central governments of sovereign states. Each central government has
relationships with other central governments and other international
actors. These relationships are summarized as that country's foreign
policy.
The state-centered point of view. The sum total and the product of all
foreign policies would result in what we call the global system.
The state-centered approach does provide important insights into global
politics.
The modern state system includes both major, middling, and small
powers. All states conduct their own foreign policies.
One primary objective of each county's foreign policy is to maintain its
(State) own political independence and security.
History
History - in many ways an understanding of the main events
in international history is integral to the study of International
Relations.
Why is history still relevant to the understanding of International
Relations?
As the philosopher George Santayana said:
'those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat
it'.
Historical events and developments form the basis of structures and
principles in International Relations, in order to understand the
international political and economic situation of today it is vital to
view them within a historical context.
History: Peace of Westphalia of 1648
Classical Greek and Roman authority at times resembled the Westphalia system, but
both lacked the notion of sovereignty.
Westphalia instituted the legal concept of sovereignty, which essentially meant that
rulers, or the legitimate sovereigns, had no internal equals within a defined territory
and no external superiors as the ultimate authority within the territory's sovereign
borders.
A simple way to view this is that SOVEREIGNTY says,
"I'M not allowed to tell YOU what to do and
YOU are not allowed to tell ME what to do.“
Westphalia encouraged :
the rise of the independent nation-state,
the institutionalization of diplomacy and armies.
This particular European system was exported to the Americas, Africa, and Asia via
colonialism.
History: Congress of Vienna of 1815
At the end of the eighteenth century Europe witnessed the Napoleonic
phenomena in the wake of the French Revolution. It shook the European
political structure to its foundations.
His defeat in 1815 at Waterloo was not simply the end of an extraordinary
adventurer. It was the beginning of a new era in the world of diplomacy.
The Congress of Vienna of 1815 marks a watershed in the development
of the European diplomatic system which the rest of the world has come to
adopt. A critical point that marks a change of course, a turning point in
International Relations.
The Congress placed the responsibility for negotiating peace and
preserving durable international structures on the shoulders of professional
diplomats to regulate the relations between the sates.
And that is where it has remained.
Congress of Vienna of 1815
The Congress of Vienna was a conference of ambassadors of European states held in
Vienna from September, 1814 to June, 1815.
OBJECTIVE :
to settle many issues arising from the French Revolutionary Wars, the Napoleonic
Wars, and the dissolution of the Holy Roman Empire.
RESULTS: redrawing of the continent's political map, establishing the boundaries
of France, Napoleon's duchy of Duchy of Warsaw , the Netherlands, the states of the
Rhine, the German province of Saxony, and various Italian territories, and the
creation of spheres of influence through which France, Austria, Russia and Britain
brokered local and regional problems.
The Congress of Vienna was a model for the League of Nations and United Nations
due to its goal to constitute peace by all parties.
The Congress of Vienna prevented another widespread European war for nearly a
hundred years (1815–1914).
International System
“The sovereign states saw the rise of democracy,
industrialization and nationalism in the nineteenth and
twentieth centuries.
The contemporary international system was finally
established through decolonization during the Cold War.
While the nation-state system is considered " modern",
many states have not incorporated the system and are
termed "pre-modern".
Further, a handful of states have moved beyond the
nation-state system and can be considered "post-modern”.
What is International Relations?
NATO.
Although nation states remain the dominant form of
Foreign relations are governed by several conditions within which they exist:
Chronological - foreign relations may be operational and ongoing where other
nations are concerned, or project-based and temporary where non-state
international agents are concerned; they may relate to factors of historical or
future considerations
Contextualized - foreign relations may be particularly affected by pertaining to
regional, economic or common goal oriented international organizational
issues, etc.
Environmental - foreign relations may develop to be cooperative, adversarial,
predatory, altruistic, mentoring, parasitic, etc.
Dynamic - Contain a degree of dependence or interdependence; a colony
would have a static relationship with the colonizer
Oriented - foreign relationships are ideally based on commitment to common
goals, but can be dysfunctional, and even destructive
Why Study International Relations?
Related Subjects
International relations is closely related to and complements many
other subjects, including politics, economics, history, law,
psychology and sociology.
Influence
Understanding international relations can help you affect the
decisions made by governments, corporations and other institutions.
Careers
Studying international relations can lead to many careers, including
diplomatic service, international business, non-profit organizations,
and law.
I R: New Challenges
Today, another revolution appears to be in process to question
authority and, for better or worse, to resist hierarchical institutions
that attempt to control their behavior and impose order on
political, economic, and social interaction.
Paralleling this institutional shift is a transformation in the global
agenda and in the meaning of "security." Issues like crime,
disease, human rights, economic development, and environmental
protection increasingly span national borders and compete for
international attention along side more traditional issues like war
and peace.
And competing conceptions of identity -- along ethnic, gender,
and cultural lines -- create new cleavages in global politics, vying
with those based on citizenship or national identity.
I R: New Challenges
Thus in today's world, three sets of fundamental questions about global
politics have simultaneously been reopened.
First, questions of what "security" means and what institutions will be
responsible for providing it -- questions that were resolved in the
seventeenth century by the development of the "state" -- are again being
debated.
Second, the central political question of the eighteenth century -- how to
create democratic political institutions that empower individuals and yet
permit the achievement of collective purposes -- is back.
And third, the question of "who we are" -- that is, the issue of identity --
which bedeviled the nineteenth and twentieth centuries has returned with
a vengeance.
Conclusion
Whether the twenty-first century is an age of
unprecedented human achievement or a dark
interregnum depends in no small measure on the answers
we can construct to these questions.
Ultimately, of course, this is why it is so exciting to
study international relations today. It is not simply that
change is all around us. It is that we can influence, if not
completely control, that change, and by doing so move
the world down different, hopefully better, paths.