Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management Accounting Chapter 5&6
Management Accounting Chapter 5&6
Both
Both systems
systems assign
assign material,
material, labor
labor and
and
overhead
overhead costs
costs to
to products
products && they
they provide
provide aa
mechanism
mechanism for for computing
computing unit
unit product
product cost.
cost.
Both
Both systems
systems use
use the
the same
same manufacturing
manufacturing
accounts,
accounts, including
including Manufacturing
Manufacturing Overhead,
Overhead,
Raw
Raw Materials,
Materials, Work
Work inin Process,
Process, & & Finished
Finished
Goods.
Goods.
The
The flow
flow of
of costs
costs through
through the
the manufacturing
manufacturing
accounts
accounts isis basically
basically the
the same
same in in both
both systems.
systems.
Differences Between Job-Order
& Process Costing
Process
Process costing
costing is is used
used when
when aa single
single product
product isis
produced
produced on on aa continuing
continuing basis
basis or
or for
for aa long
long period
period of
of
time.
time. Job-order
Job-order costing
costing isis used
used when
when many
many different
different jobs
jobs
are
are worked
worked on on each
each period.
period.
Process
Process costing
costing systems
systems accumulate
accumulate costs
costs by
by
department.
department. Job-order
Job-order costing
costing systems
systems accumulated
accumulated
costs
costs by
by individual
individual jobs.
jobs.
Process
Process costing
costing systems
systems use use department
department production
production
reports
reports to
to accumulate
accumulate costs.
costs. Job-order
Job-order costing
costing systems
systems
use
use job
job cost
cost sheets
sheets toto accumulate
accumulate costs.
costs.
Process
Process costing
costing systems
systems compute
compute unit
unit costs
costs byby
department.
department. Job-order
Job-order costing
costing systems
systems compute
compute unitunit
costs
costs by
by job.
job.
Quick Check
Direct
Direct
Materials
Materials
Manufacturing
Manufacturing Cost
Cost of
of
Overhead
Overhead Goods
Goods
Sold
Sold
Comparing Job-Order
and Process Costing
Costs
Costs are
are traced
traced and
and
applied
applied to
to individual
individual
Direct
Direct jobs
jobs in
in aa job-order
job-order
Materials
Materials cost
cost system.
system.
Direct Finished
Finished
Direct Labor
Labor Jobs Goods
Goods
Manufacturing
Manufacturing Cost
Cost of
of
Overhead
Overhead Goods
Goods
Sold
Sold
Comparing Job-Order
and Process Costing
Costs
Costs areare traced
traced and
and
applied
applied toto departments
departments
Direct
Direct in
in aa process
process cost
cost
Materials
Materials system.
system.
Direct Processing
Processing Finished
Finished
Direct Labor
Labor Goods
Department
Department Goods
Manufacturing
Manufacturing Cost
Cost of
of
Overhead
Overhead Goods
Goods
Sold
Sold
Process Cost Flows
(in T-account form)
Work in Process
Raw Materials Department A
• Direct • Direct
Materials Materials
Work in Process
Department B
• Direct
Materials
Process Cost Flows
(in T-account form)
Work in Process
Department A
Wages Payable
• Direct
• Direct Materials
Labor • Direct
Labor
Work in Process
Department B
• Direct
Materials
• Direct
Labor
Process Cost Flows
(in T-account form)
Work in Process
Department A
Manufacturing • Direct
Overhead Materials
• Direct
• Actual • Overhead Labor
Overhead Applied to • Applied
Work in Overhead
Process
Work in Process
Department B
• Direct
Materials
• Direct
Labor
• Applied
Overhead
Process Cost Flows
(in T-account form)
Work in Process
Department B Finished Goods
• Direct • Cost of • Cost of
Materials Goods Goods
• Direct Manufactured Manufactured
Labor
• Applied
Overhead
• Transferred
from Dept. A
Process Cost Flows
(in T-account form)
Work in Process
Department B Finished Goods
• Direct • Cost of • Cost of • Cost of
Materials Goods Goods Goods
• Direct Manufactured Manufactured Sold
Labor
• Applied
Overhead
• Transferred
from Dept. A Cost of Goods Sold
• Cost of
Goods
Sold
Equivalent Units of Production
Equivalent units are the (multiplication) product
of the number of partially completed units and the
percentage
of completion of those units.
OR number of partially completed unites X %age of
completion
+ = 1
So,
So, 10,000
10,000 units
units 70%
70% complete
complete
are
are equivalent
equivalent to
to 7,000
7,000 complete
complete units.
units.
Quick Check
For
For the
the current
current period,
period, Jones
Jones started
started 15,000
15,000
units
units and completed 10,000 units,units, leaving
leaving
5,000
5,000 units
units in
in process
process that
that are
are 3030 percent
percent
complete.
complete. HowHow many
many equivalent
equivalent units
units of
of
production
production did
did Jones
Jones have
have for
for the
the period?
period?
a.
a. 10,000
10,000
10,000 units + (5,000 units × 0.30)
b. 11,500
b. 11,500 = 11,500 equivalent units
c.
c. 13,500
13,500
d.
d. 15,000
15,000
Equivalent Units of Production
Weighted-Average Method
The weighted-average method . . .
• Makes no distinction between work done in prior or
current periods.
• Blends together units & costs from prior and
current periods.
Percent Completed
Units Materials Conversion
Work in process, June 1 300 40% 20%
Materials Conversion
Units completed and transferred
out of Department A in June 5,400 5,400
Weighted-Average Example
Materials Conversion
Units completed and transferred
out of Department A in June 5,400 5,400
Work in process, June 30:
900 units × 60% 540
900 units × 30% 270
Equivalent units of Production in
Department A during June 5,940 5,670
Weighted-Average Example
Beginning Ending
Work in Process 5,100 Units Started Work in Process
300 Units and Completed 900 Units
40% Complete 60% Complete
Conversion
Conversion 6,000 Units Started
Beginning Ending
Work in Process 5,100 Units Started Work in Process
300 Units and Completed 900 Units
20% Complete 30% Complete
Production Report
AA quantity
quantity schedule
schedule
showing
showing the
the flow
flow of
of units
units
Section 1 and
and the
the computation
computation ofof
equivalent
equivalent units.
units.
AA computation
computation of
of
Section 2 cost
cost per
per equivalent
equivalent unit.
unit.
Section 3
Production Report
Production Report
Section 1
Section 2
Cost
Cost Reconciliation
Reconciliation
section
section shows
shows the
the
reconciliation
reconciliation of
of all
all cost
cost
Section 3 flows
flows into
into and
and out
out of
of the
the
department
department during
during the
the
period.
period.
Production Report Example
Assume
Assume thatthat Double
Double D.D. co.
co. uses
uses the
the
weighted-average
weighted-average method
method ofof process
process costing
costing
to
to determine
determine unit
unit costs
costs in
in itit Shaping
Shaping and
and
Milling
Milling Department.
Department.
Production Report Example
Work
Work in
in process,
process, May
May 1:
1: 200
200 units
units
Materials:
Materials: 55%
55% complete
complete $$ 9,6009,600
Conversion:
Conversion: 30%
30% complete
complete 5,575
5,575
Production
Production started
started during
during May
May 5,000
5,000 units
units
Production
Production completed
completed during
during May
May 4,800
4,800 units
units
Costs
Costs added
added to
to production
production in
in May
May
Materials
Materials cost
cost $$ 368,600
368,600
Conversion
Conversion cost
cost 350,900
350,900
Work
Work in
in process,
process, May
May 31
31 400
400 units
units
Materials:
Materials: 40%
40% complete
complete
Conversion:
Conversion: 25%
25% complete
complete
Learning Objective
LO3
To prepare a quantity
schedule using the
weighted-average method.
Production Report Example
Equivalent units
Materials Conversion
Units accounted for as follows:
Completed and transferred 4,800 4,800 4,800
Work in process, May 31 400
Production Report Example
Equivalent units
Materials Conversion
Units accounted for as follows:
Completed and transferred 4,800 4,800 4,800
Work in process, May 31 400
Materials 40% complete 160
5,200 4,960
Production Report Example
Equivalent units
Materials Conversion
Units accounted for as follows:
Completed and transferred 4,800 4,800 4,800
Work in process, May 31 400
Materials 40% complete 160
Conversion 25% complete 100
5,200 4,960 4,900
Learning Objective
LO4
Total
Cost Materials Conversion
Cost to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1 $ 15,175 $ 9,600 $ 5,575
Costs added in the Shipping
and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900
Total cost $ 734,675 $ 378,200 $ 356,475
Total
Cost Materials Conversion
Cost to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1 $ 15,175 $ 9,600 $ 5,575
Costs added in the Shipping
and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900
Total cost $ 734,675 $ 378,200 $ 356,475
Total
Cost Materials Conversion
Cost to be accounted for:
Work in process, May 1 $ 15,175 $ 9,600 $ 5,575
Costs added in the Shipping
and Milling Department 719,500 368,600 350,900
Total cost $ 734,675 $ 378,200 $ 356,475
To prepare a cost
reconciliation using the
weighted-average method.
Production Report Example
Step 3: Prepare a Cost Reconciliation
Ermias M 48
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
i. Traditional Approach
• A single predetermined overhead rate is used to
apply (allocate) manufacturing overhead costs.
• The total manufacturing overhead cost
represents one cost pool.
• and volume based costs, such as:
• direct labor costs,
• direct material costs,
• machine costs
represent the direct cost components of the
production/product.
Ermias M 49
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
• Then overhead cost could be applied based on either:
• Direct labour hours
• Machine hours
How is it calculated?
Overhead Cost Per Direct Labour Hour =Total Budgeted
Overhead Costs/Total Budgeted Direct Labour Hours for the
period.
Ermias M 50
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
Example:
• Suppose a Sony TV set manufacturer produces
14” and 21” color TV sets.
• They are using the application of one cost pool
of overhead costs to the two product lines.
• Suppose Sony prefer machine hours to allocate
overhead costs.
• For the next year, the overhead costs are
expected to amount to $300,000 and
• the total machine hours worked are expected
to be 30,000 hours. Ermias M 51
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
• Using this information we can easily estimate
overhead cost per machine hour as follows:
• OHC per Machine Hr = Budgeted Total OHC/Total
Machine Hours
OHC per machine hour = $300,000/30,000 = $10
Ermias M 52
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
• During the year, 10,000 machine hours were
used to produce 5,000, 14-inch TV sets
and 20,000 machine hours were used to
produce 4,000, 21-inch TV sets.
• Sony uses the predetermined overhead rate
of $10 per machine hour to allocate the
overhead costs.
• The portion of manufacturing overhead costs
allocated to the 14-inch TV sets =
$10/MH x 10,000 MH = $100,000
Ermias M 53
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
For each 14 –inch TV set overhead cost will be
$100,000/5,000 = $ 20 per unit
• The portion applied to 21-inch TV sets totaled
$10/MHr x 20,000 M/hr = $200,000 or
For each 21-inch TV set = $50 ($200,000/
4,000units)
• If we want to calculate the product unit
cost during the accounting period, we need
the direct cost of each product.
Ermias M 54
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
The corporation supplied the following data for the
two product lines:
14 inch 21inch
Actual direct material $70 $ 80
Actual direct labor 30 40
Overhead cost 20 50
Total unit cost $120 $170
Ermias M 55
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
• This total cost represents the minimum price of
the product.
• If the company wants to make 10% of the total
cost as profit margin, the price can be
determined as follows:
• 14-inch TV set =0.1*$120 = $12 + 120 = $ 132
• 21-inch TV set =0.1*$170 = $17 + 170 = $ 187
Ermias M 56
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
ii/ Activity Based Costing Approach
• Another method of cost allocation is the activity based
costing approach.
• Activity–Based Costing (ABC) costs products more
accurately.
• It will:
• Categorize all indirect costs by activity,
• Trace the indirect costs to those activities and then
assign them to the products.
• ABC will improve the accuracy of product costing for
organizations that sell many different types of products.
Ermias M 57
Activity-Based Costing
• Activity-based costing (ABC) allocates overhead to multiple activity
cost pools & assigns the activity cost pools to production by means of
cost drivers.
• In ABC, an activity is any event, action, transaction, or work
sequence that causes the incurrence of cost in the production of a
product or rendering of a service.
• A cost driver is any factor or activity that has a direct cause/effect
relationship with the resources consumed.
Activity-Based Costing
• ABC first allocates costs to activities, and then to the products
based on each product’s use of those activities.
• The reasoning behind ABC cost allocation is simple: products
consume activities; activities consume resources.
Activity-based costing involves the following four steps
Overhead Costs
Ordering
Setting Inspecting
and Assem- Super-
Up Machining and Painting
Receiving bling vising
Machines Cost Pool Testing Cost Pool
Materials Cost Pool Cost Pool Cost Pool
Cost Pool
Cost Pool
Products
When to Switch to ABC
The presence of the following factors indicates ABC as the
superior costing system:
1. Product lines are numerous, diverse, and require differing
degrees of support services.
2. Product lines differ greatly in volume & manufacturing
complexity.
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
• Under this approach we need to identify production-
related activities and events, such as:
Number of materials orders
Number of machine setups
Number of inspections,
Number of maintenance hours, etc
• As a result, from the single manufacturing overhead
cost pool,
• a number of smaller activity pools are created.
• For each activity pool, predetermined overhead rate or
activity cost rate is determined.
Ermias M 65
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
• Thus, ABC assigns overhead costs based on the relative use
of overhead resources.
Consider the previous example
• Sony used traditional approach for assigning manufacturing
overhead costs to two kinds of TV sets.
• The cost difference between the two TV sets is wide
($50).
• The company wanted to revise its cost estimation.
• No error was found in estimating the direct material &
labour costs.
Ermias M 66
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based Costing (ABC)
Ermias M 67
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
These are:
1. Setup: preparing machines for production of
each batch.
• The estimated total costs of this activity
are $100,000 for indirect manufacturing
costs.
2.Inspection: This constitutes costs of testing
the products at different stage.
• This includes $90,000 for salaries, costs of
indirect materials, indirect labor and
depreciation on testing equipment.
Ermias M 68
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
3. Packaging: This cost includes estimated total
costs of $65,000 for indirect materials,
indirect labor, and equipment depreciation
related to packaging.
4. The last activity is Others: This includes:
• wages,
• property taxes,
• insurance,
• security and all other costs not related
to the first three activities with costs of
$45,000.
Ermias M 69
Allocation of Overhead Costs (Cont…)
• After identifying activity pools, and
estimating activity pool costs.
• then estimate the cost drivers, that are the
levels of each activity performed.
• We use this information to determine activity
rate.
Activity OHC rate = Activity cost/cost driver
• Cost driver can be:
• Number of setups
• Number of inspections
• Packaging hours
• Machine/labour hours
Ermias M 70
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
Estimated Cost Driver Level
Cost driver 14inch 21inch Total
Number of setups 500 500 1,000
No of inspections 250 350 600
Packaging hours 1,200 1,300 2,500
Other (labor 14,000 16,000 30,000
hours )
Ermias M 71
Activity Driver
pool level Cost Cost rate
Number of 1,000 $100,000 $100,000/1,000 $100 per
setups setup
Number of 600 $90,000 $90,000/ 600 $150 per
inspections inspection
Packaging 2,500 $65,000 $65,000/2,500 $26 per
hours packaging
hr
Labor 30,000 $45,000 $45,000/30,000 $1.5. per
hours labour hr
Ermias M 72
Exercise
• Mordica Company identifies three activities in its manufacturing process:
machine setups,
machining, and
inspections.
• Estimated annual overhead cost for each activity is $150,000, $325,000,
and $87,500, respectively.
• The cost driver for each activity and the expected annual usage are:
• number of setups 2,500,
• machine hours 25,000, and
• number of inspections 1,750.
• Compute the overhead rate for each activity
Ermias M 73
Overhead Allocation Using Activity Based
Costing (ABC)
Application of Manufacturing Overhead Costs
to Products
• How do we apply manufacturing overhead costs
to products?
• Applying the manufacturing overhead to the
products involves:
• the activity pool rate is multiplied by
the actual cost driver used by the
products.
Ermias M 74
14 inch
Activity Activity cost Cost Driver Cost applied
pool rate level
Set up $100 per set 500 set ups 500*100=
up $50,000
Packing $26 per 1,200 packing 1200*26=
packing hour hour $31,200
Inspectio $150 per Ins 250 inspections $37,500
n
$1.5 per 14,000 Machine $21,000
Others Machine hour hrs
Total $139,700
Number of units
Ermias M
5,000 75
21 inch
Activity Activity cost Cost Driver Cost
pool rate level applied
Set up $100 per set *500 set ups
up $50,000
Inspection $150 per Ins 350 inspections $52,500
Ermias M 77
Allocation of Overhead Costs
(Cont…)
• The unit product cost is $128 for 14-inch model
and $160 for the 21-inch model.
• Management accountant presented the following
information for decision
Model 14-inch 21-
inch
1. One manufacturing overhead $ 120 $170
Cost pool (traditional approach)
2. Product unit cost: ABC with
four activity pools $128 $ 160
Differences: Decrease (increase)
Ermias M $ (8) $ 10 78
Exercise
Ermias M 79
Exercise …
Required:
1. Determine unit product costs of the Standard & Deluxe products
under the company’s traditional costing system.
2. The company is considering replacing its traditional costing
system with an activity-based costing system. Below is data
relevant to the activity-based costing system which has three
activity cost pools:
expected activity
activity and activity measures estimated
overhead cost standard deluxe total
supporting direct labor (direct labor hrs) Br.150,000 42,000 8,000 50,000
batch setups (setups) 60,000 50 200 250
safety testing (tests) 80,000 20 80 100
total manufacturing overhead cost Br.290,000
• * OH rate =$290,000/50,000DLhrs=$5.8/DLhrs.
Ermias M 81
Soln=cost per activity
expected activity
activity and activity Cost per
measures estimated overhead
cost standard deluxe total activity
supporting direct 150000/5000=3
labor (direct labor
hrs) Br.150,000 42,000 8,000 50,000
batch setups (setups) 60,000 50 200 250 60000/250=240
safety testing (tests) 80,000 20 80 100 80000/100=800
total manufacturing
overhead cost Br.290,000
Ermias M 82
Soln..
standard
Activity pool Activity cost rate Cost Driver level Cost applied
supporting direct labor (direct
labor hrs) $3 per hr 42,000 126,000
$240 per setup 12,000
batch setups (setups) 50
Ermias M 83
solu
Deluxe
Activity pool Activity cost rate Cost Driver level Cost applied
supporting direct labor (direct
labor hrs) $3 per hr 8,000 24,000
batch setups (setups) $240 per setup 200 48,000
safety testing (tests) $800 per test 80 64,000
Total $136,000
Number of units 10,000
Manufacturing overhead costs per unit $ 13.6
Unit cost = 1200+192+13.6=1405.6
Ermias M 84