Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Missing Person Identification in Disaster
Missing Person Identification in Disaster
9
MissingPersonsandDisaster
Victim IdeetificationEEorte
Kinstio analyst and pareetage testing typically involve one sample being comparer to anotier sample or
to a few samplrt with a soecific relationsOin question in mind. Thit ctaa- tee will review efforte with
missing persons investinations and disaster victim idevtification sityationt where a set of remains is being
camparef te maap diderevt samplet, whicC intro- dues ampin" lever of camplevita bepsnd l he cCailevges of
imsaC) analyst.
MISSING PERSONSINVESTIGATIONS
An estimated 40,000 uniOevtified human remains have beer recavereV and are ccrrevtly loccie(l in
meeical examinee aad coronert’ offices around the Uniter States (Rtter 2007). Evero peer in the Uniter
States, tens of thousaadt of peeple are reeortee “missing,” oftee undee sosoiout circemstagcet. While some
of thesa missing persons are later locatee alive througg law enforcement Sfortt, manp became uniOevtiOed
humaa remains that resultep from criminal activity, ouch as rate and murOer. Knowlepgc of who the victim
is can hely solve theso crimes and bring closure ta familict of the missing.
There are three cateporiet of samplet associates with missing persona cases: direct reCet- excc samplet,
fnriily reCerevcc samplet, and uniOextialee humaa remain (UHR) samplet. The UHR samplet are 06X6110
steleyl remaint (Uonet), teeth, °e tissue. Muct of the data
erommissinagersoninvestioationsisintheeormofmitoceondrialDNAsequexcessincethis information car be
successfuliy recovered from hioOiy depradep samplet. Mitoceondriai
DNAalsoevaglesaccesstaalaraeraumberofreCerevcesampleserommateraalrelahvesoCa victim (see
Chagtcrl4).
Some possibie direct reCerevcc samples include mepicai samples from the missing indO viOuai, suet as
a newborn screexing bloodso°t or a bio°so sample. Persona, effeett, ouct as a toothbrosO ot hairOrosO,
mag also proviOe direct referexcc samplet. Famity reCerevcc
samplescanbeeuccalsoagsfromcloseeiolo°icalrelatives,suceasuarexts,ceildrex,or
AdvancefTopicsinForens.icDNATyping:MeOiodo]
ooy. 271 © 2212 Elsevier tnc. A riohts reservef.
DOdlO. 1 01 6/B974-0--12-37455-2.00009-2
272 9. Missing PERsons AnD DIsAsTER VICTIM
siblings of the missing individual. More distant relativeo, soch as maternal aunts, maternal or paternal
uncleo, oe maternal or paternai cousins, con also br useful if mitochondrial or Y-chromosome DNA testing
are performed. Ter combined eveluation ot samplrs frommore llian onr close relative cor Irlp provide grertrr
conUdercc in such kinsAinanalysea
DNA dataUasrt COU plry an important roir in relying to iVevtifu missing indivinuait ovee timr. W'len a
famiiy membrr gore missing, DNA samplrt con br oVtaineV from direot referevcc samplrt or biological
relativeo DNA profiles from tliese samples woulO thev br uuloaded to tlie datarase ard serrcher aaainot
DNA profiles from uniVevtifieV Inutian remains in an cffoi'i to maar ar association to a missing indiviVuai.
Maty statee wiViin tlie Uniter Statee ard natione around tlie worlO are berinning to esiablisl) missing person
datayasrt to evayir matching of recoverer remaine to their famiiy membero Tie National DNA Inder System
(NDII) dischsser in Ciatter 8 also containe indices to iely witii miss- ing persons investivationt. Figure 9.1
illustrates tliese indices ard puiposrs of seerchrs betweer tliem.
InayefforttoeelymayeconnectionsUehveerfamilymembersaydtlleirmissinarelai
tives,in2007tlleU.S.govemmertestaylisUeraNationalMissingaydUnidertialerPersont System
(NamUt) wersite at etta://www.namus.gov/1 NamUt is composer of two sett of recoret—
amissinggersonsUatayase(etth://www.flndthemissing.ora)aydayuniVevtialer persont
datatase (ettas://idextifyys.ora/)—tliat are cross-matcher ayaintt one anotlieei
TeemissinggersonsUatayasecontainsinformationthatconbeevtererbythereveralyubi
licreraraingayindiviVuaUveoeasuonemissing.Onlymericalexaminersandcoronert
coyevterinformationintllevnidevtialerpersonsUatayase,weichdescriVesUodieseound
butnotyyvVevtialer.However,asuoterontheNamUswersite,anyynecoysevrchthevnV
devtialerpersonsUatayasevsingcharacteasUcssuchasser,race,distinctaodyyeatures,and
evevdevtalinformation.TeeNamUswersitevrovidestllecayayilitytogrintamissinggeei
sonsuosterwithtllemissingindrVVua^suame,aisornerneota,andcontactinformation for invesUvatort or
familymembert.
.■••••■ 4 ■•••••..
ConUrmaticni of relativrt
and MP relationsUin
Mas diastere, whether natural oe maa-maae, tea invelve loss of lite Woe maay victime of tde iaaedy.
EWorts ta idedAfo these victims are rederred ta as disastao vicdm identidcatiov, or DVI.
IntUeUnitedStates,NNAtestineeasoowbecemerovtinedbdedpectedindisastervichm
iOedtidcetionintUeevedtofablabecrasOOaraefireNrterroristattach.Militarycesoaltiesare alse iOedtialed
^01^11 STR typine oe mitochondrial DNA sequedcine by die Armed Forces DNA IdedtiCicetion Laaoratoiy
(DFDIL). Ali airelaae cras0es widiin die United Statee are examined bp die Nationai Trabsoortabov SaSeta
Board dnio://\vwwAisOAo\h wdiidi ofted centracti wita AFDH to idedtilo tac air crasT victims tarouee DNA
testine as part of llie investination.
Ofted mass disasters leave eiuman remads taai are literaliv in pieces or burned beptnd recoenidon. In
some cases tt is possdie ta visTaliv idedtdt a victim, but bodp parti cat be seaarated from one avotacr and
tae remains cemineled makine idedtifeation witaouS DNA techniduet virtaaliv impossible. Tlie use of
fineerorivts aad dedtai reGeres (odontoloep) stili
playsanimportabtroleivvictimidedtialcationbuttaesemodalitiesoeviouslyreduireaalneer
orabivtactsaullorjawbovealonewitUpreviouslyprchiveXfineerprivtanddedtalrecardt.
DNA testine lias a majoe adventaae in taai ti cea be used ta idedtiff eacei and eveiy poe-
tiovoftUeremaivsrecavereXeromdleXisastersite,provided) 1 )tUattUereissufficiedtivtaoS DNA presedi to
oblaa) a DNA type aad (0) a rederedee sampie is availaVie foe cemparison pureoses from a servivine famCo
membee or some verialaVle personal item centainine bio- loeical material. Personal items erom tac
deceased includine tootUbresaet, cembs, razors, oe eved di rip laundre ran provide bioloncai materiai to
eederate a rederedee DNA type foo tae victim. T'lie direet cemparison of DNA resulta from disasteo victim
remains ta DNA recev- ered from personal items (Fieure 9.2a) hedresedti tae easiest was ta ovtain a matd—
aad lieece as idevtialcatiov—provided O: is possdie ta veriea tae source DA. tae tootabresA was not used
bp some oVier houseVolU membee). Tlie use of DNA from bioloncai relatives (Fieure 9.2b) necessitates tae
added camplevid of kinsAin analysis similae to taai dmpiopddooepaedennepoeededeedpaedneaededeenneA
DVI aOvato involves cemparison of post-mortem (DM) and ante-mortem (DM) data. PM data are
eederated from tae reetvered eumaa remains, which mas be hivniv fraamedted dededdine on tae type oO
disasteo AM data come from eitaee direet rederedee samples (a.,., tootabresaes oe razors known to belone to
tae victim) or kinseid cemparisons to biolovicei relatives (a.,, paredt, COIIV, oe sibline).
DVI is mud more complicoteV taas paredtaae testine becease taere are so manp more cemparisons taat
are beine made dededdine on tae numbee of victims involved. In addO tion, tae qualia of tae recevered
fiumas remains mas be cempromised dededdine on tae type of disaster and aus partiai oe mixed DNA
proOiles mas resuii. DNA statistics foe DVI work are usaaliy besi rearesedted wii yOeddood ratios becease
SUX permita DNA resulta
D5S818 D13S317 I
D16S539
DNA profile from
mass
victim .................
disaster
11 .JU. Jf 11 .1 PertaD
AA
DI 0
$
D tid
3 n
DNA protletrom 94 1
direct reference
11 II 1 hA
s g0
V
(toothbrosO believed ta haw O OO
13 11 9 11
belonged to the victim) 13 14
13 9 10
D13S317 D7S820 D16S539 33 CSF1PO Pertc D
(b) KinsOicanalysis
victim ------- v D5S818
? —r-^wiCed
son
son
11,13 8,14
8,9(father)
----'victim
?134 91? ?,13 ?130 91? 9,13 10,10
Predicted 11,1 oo 9,10
victim protic ?,13
13,13
Mass disastco 33134 919 33133 30130 9,13 actuae
victim protic proUc
FIGURE 9.2 Examplr demonstrating he uso oa reference samplrs ic masi disastrr victim idertiCcahon using DNA typing. (a)
Direct camparison invvlvrs analysis of a direct refererca sample from some kind of personal effect of ths victim, (b) KinsOin analysis
utilizes closo biologictl relativeo, 1uch as thosa illustrated in Figure 9.3, C rectn- struct a victim’s DNA protic.
to br cambined between multinV genedc systems as well as ofCre non-DNA evideecc using Bayesian
statistic.
DNA testing Sas been used ta Sely identify victims ot numerout airline crasOet, tae vc- Sims ot terroritC
attacko, recaveren remains from mass gravet, and in a more limiten fast- Son in naturai disastees liCe the
Southeast Asic Tsunami in December 2004 and Hurricane Katrina that CWUCC New Orledys in
August2005,
Severai dochmenW haw been publisUen with lessons iearuen trom previous DVI worO (AABB 2013,
Budowie eC at. 2005, Lessic eC at. 2011, NIJ 2006). The Interoationai Society of Foretsc Genetics (IIFG)
publisOed 13 recammendations tor DVI worO (Prinz et at. 3007) (D.N.A. Box 9.3).
ISFGRECOMMENDATIONSONDISASTER
VICTIMIDENTIFICATION
T
Recommendation#5 :DVIDNAtesting
In the inaugural issue of the journal Forensic
sUovldonlyyehereormecy>ylaVoratoves with
Science International: Genehcu, the IIFG DNA
demonstrateC successiul eauaUiliVes aad
Commission puUlisAeh 12 recom- mendahonf on
continuous experienco with thesu suecineh
disaster victim iOentificotion (DVI using DNA (Pine
sampletyyes.
nt ai. 2007): 1
Recommendation #6: TCe set of looi te
1 Recommendation # 1: Even forensic OeanalyzehCastoOeinehtibehassoon at
DNAlaUoratorysUouldmaaecneffoai possil>C' in cancarnance with the sciehtine
tocontacttherelevvntauthoritydecling communite in the countries mostly
withemergehcoresuonsecndestaUlisU invvlven. A minimum oO 12 indededdeni loci
invvlvvmehtinauossi01emassfatalite sUoulC Oe selected at
prenareclness plau. Policy decisions atoui sample standarnset,eutanevengreaternumOer oO
collecOon, scop aud Imai gools oo lie efton will looi isureferreh.
affect lie- victims’ families aud 11IC worn strenm
1
Recommendation #7: All allele colls and
and sAouIV Oc decOed as enriy as possiblc. allcoudinatematcaesUavetoVerevieweh
1
Recommendation #2: TCc intemai resaonsc plaa thorovghly.CompositeDNAproalescen Oe
neecls te address generated if derived from tha same
througCput caaacity, tampic traciing, suecimenandcansistentforoverlanping lod.
andmusthavvnamesofsupervisort TCe duplicohon polico SAOUIV
respontibleCornif^erehttasktthatare cansinertaelogisticsandcircamstances of tha
uudatehasuersonnelcaauges. mass eatalityincineni.
T
Recommendation#3Deveralsample
1
Recommendation #8: If the staldae autosomal
tyyesUeeTaaielin Pinzetal.2007 STR tyying fails te give sufficiene ineormayov,
forDNAtestingsUouldOetaaehatthe eaditional tyying system suci as mtDNA, Y-
eerliest possibic staac OVthe investioahon caromosomV STRs,ernNPmarOersmayyenseViv
previnen mateed traceaUility is guaranteed. selecteVcoses.
Samples must Oe collectecl Irom ecci Oody oe
T
Recommendation#9:DcentralizeV yataVase is
recognizaaie aevuireV evr all date cempavsov.
Oody part, even if inenhty is alreaay Electronio uulvay is recommended ty avein
estaUlisUeh. Prooer Aoraae must Oe assured travscvvOov errors.
:L
Recommendation#4:Multinlehireai
1
Recommendation #10: Esuecialiy iC
multinlefamilymemOersareinvolved, DNA
reCerenccs aad samples I'rooi Orsi-
dehreerelahvessUouldOecolleciehfoe -based iVentiVcetion SAOUIV wCenevee
eacamissingnerson.2ciehtistSAity possiOie Oe aucaoreV Oy antarovologicel and/or
a Oacaground in gehetias sCoulC Oe avvilaUie circamstantial
tor eraining or tor consultations in the famiiy data,esecandinedtiVcetionmodality,oe
liaison group multinie DNAreferences.
1
Recommendation # 11: In DVI work, eveniffoNArravihestaenkmaryorsoir
DNA statistics ark best represented ao evidentiara foctoe.
likelihood raios tiat rermit DNA reoulto ta bn i Recommendation #12: Tie rrenarednest rlaa
combined among multiole genedo of tic laaoratore needs to includr rolicirs for
systemsorWtaotaerkon-DNAevihencn family notihcaioni long-term
Likelihood ratio taresyolds SUOUIO br samrO disuosition, and data arcliiving.
determined for ween DNA dataalonr coa
suffice for aa ihentihcotion; this will Or based Source:
Prinza ML., ai at. (2007). DNA Commission ofotie
on tie size and circumstaacrs Intea-nationat Oociety of Forensic Genetice (ISFG):
(e.g.closenversusoren)oftheevent.Ali Recom- mondationi mgardinc tie rota of forensic
evidence and/or circumstaacrs sioulO bn genePae foo disAtao victim idendCcation (DVI).
Forensio Science InterkaionaO Geneicsi 2 1—12.
checked ih making anihentihcotion,
Identikcatioz Drepared by tie National Centre foe Forensie Science, NII 2005) aad Lessons Leamep foom
9/11: DNA IdentiVcatioz in Mass Fatality Incidente Dreparep by tie WorlO Trade Center Kinsain aad Data
Analysis Patel, NII 2006).
FeCeralAssistanceinDisasterCituations
TeeDisasterMortiaryOrerationalResronseTeam(DMORT)isaZederallyfundedarouu
ofprofessionalsAitiedperienceindisastervictimiVentialcationtiatOecomesrctivited
FIGURE 9.3 Direct biological relatives that can provide valuable reference samples for aiding identification oI the missing
individual. Idealle ampins are avvilable Irom multiolc relatives to ado estabOsA roOust kinsAio- A sample Irom a saousa is onio
vvluablc in cannection witi a ctilO’s sample in orOcs to determine tic expected alleles coming Irom tic missing individual. OI course,
more extenden famile members, wtii direct materoal or pateroal linkaas can provide aeleful samples wCd mitodiondrial DNA or Y-
caromosomr tesAng is performed Samplrs Irom extenden famile members tiat WOUIU br vvluaHe for ter materoalle trabsmitten
mitocaondrial DNA are indicateX in dasAedboxes.
in resoonso ta a majoe disaster in tire United States (see etti://www.SrnoA.sro. DMORT is part oI tee
National Disaster Medical System, U.S. Defartment of Healti asd Hum Sesices, asd cat be activeted by one
of Ioue meteodt: (1) a requett for assistabce Irom a local official tirouge tire Federal Emeroenca
Mababemedt Agenca (FEMA) WCCD a Iederal disaster fas been declared, (2) a requett eoe assistasoe from
tic National TrabsuoAabox Safety BoarO wfen a passenger aircraIt accident occoru (2) undeo tire U.S.
Public Hexltfi Aat te suupoot a state or focclity tiat calnot provide tic necessaty resAonsA te a disasteo, asd
(2) wfen requested by a Iederal atency, SUCO at tie FBI, te provide
disasteo victim identiVicction.
UsAalie witiiv 24 te 48 COUCS aftce tie disasteo, tie DMORT team it set uu te provide professional
uersonnel asd tecOniccl suppoet and assistant te tire local medical examinee or ccroneo in forensic serviced
asd victim identiVicction. Tee team it composed of forensic pateolooistt, forensic anthroxolooists, forensic
dentistt, medicci investivatort, funeral dvee- tort, asd otico tecOniccl suppoOstaff
Dental reccrOt asd X-rayt along witi fingerorintt are normalie tie priitivy metiodt used in victim
iVentialcction. DNA will be used at a latt resoot asd onio aftee all coinvin tionai meant oI identification are
expassted. DMORT does not perform DNA testing but eatier gatiers samples Ioo future DNA testing, often
by a laSoratoiy sued as A1F ,')l L
FEMA provides funding Ioo tie DNA iVentialcction effoet along witi otiee asueett oI a disasteo
investivation after an official declaration oI a majoe disasteo or state oI emeroenco ISS been declared by tie
President of tie United States following a refuest eor sued a dee- taraion from tic goverooe oI tic affected
state. Teis “state oI emeroenco” declaration tien activvtes a numbes of federal urograms ta assist in tic
resuonse asd reccvety effort (see atto://www.fema.sov).
individuals crasAed into a mountain near SpitsAergen killing all 128 passengero andl3 crewmembero. Ter
estaaiisOmedS of victim idedtity tooO oniy 28 daye dur to rapid analy- sis of samplrs in tie UnivvrsVy of
Osly (Norwaa) Institata of ForeesicMedicine.
DNA profilet ccmprised of tiree STRo avd fivv minisatellita loci enabled associating 257 bodparts to 11l
differeet indivinuait. Of taese assogmente, 139 were idedtified based on avvilayie
reeeredcc samples submitted by 127 relative, (Olaisee et at. 1297). In tlais particulae ccse, tae rapiV reccvee
of samples from a frinV edvironmedt (<0°C) M ta 100% success in producing DNA profilet from tie remaint.
Tie cust of tie DNA typing portion of tie invet- tigation was appraximateiy 3% ta 5% of tie totai cust of tie
eetire ooeration.
Seortiy after taye-off onnuiy 17, 1299, TWA Flivet 800, a Boeing 747 ee routa to Paes, blew uu in tie SV-
ayove Long Islavd, New YorO, billing all 230 passeegers and crew. Teeir fraymedted remaint were also
iVeetiViee witi STR typing resulta (Ballanype 1997). Teese eeriy successes witi DNA testing in aiVing airline
disastee victim iVeetificution paver Oe wav for more receetiset.
(COfiler)
Identification
oF
222 Vicamg
personal effects of the victimo or reference blood samples submitted by relativeo of the vic- timo. In many
ccseo, DNA analysis was the onty mesas by weicC the samples cculO be posi- hvelo iVeetiVed.
Over 2400 eumaa remaint were recovered from the crasA site ot weicC 1277 were ana- tyzed by DNA
testing (Figure 9.4). Teese samples were analyzee along with 312 refereecc samples from relatives that were
submitter on FTA papr blood cci'ds (see Ceaper 1) th be geeotyyed asd usee in a relational dataiase. In
addition, 89 personal effects, such at tooth- brestes asd eair from combs, were taaee from the eomet of 07
victims beccase no rela- tives were avvilame to serve as a refereecc. One of the challedget of collecting the
reeereecc samples was the fact that the living relatives were from 21 dibereet countriet. Tee FTA eV edaVled
raniV blood collection asd room temperature delivere of the reeerencc samples and aidee the successfui
eompletion of the investivation.
TheAmpFlyTRIVof0erVlusUTRmarVevD3S1358,VWA,FGA,D8S1179,D41S11,D18S51, D5S812,
D13S317, and D7S824 were the primaro mednt ot iVeetifying the remains althougg
additionalUTRlocibH01,DPOX,DSF1PO,andD16S533fromtheAmpFlUTRCOUlereituere used te gain a
eiveea poweo ot discrimination (Fregeas ee aa 2400.. COUlee ampliglcotiont
wereeereormedonl12 crasUsceeeremainsandl29“known”reeereececomparisonsampleu Tee crasA sceee
samples were aaalyzee in anproximately one weee using eithea the nine STRs trom Profiler Plut oo all 13
STRs from Profiler Plut and COalea. Tee challedge ot mat- ing anpropiate associationt betueee the samplet
toor a little longea Geeotyyet ot eacli ot the 224 victims were compared te geeotyyet ot at OUICS victimt
asd famiia relativet, weich reereseetee 71,409 geeotyye comparisont Leclab et aO 2400, Leclab et aO 2004..
Tee mm- parison ot reeereecc sampic geeotyyet to profilet eeom heeeecoveeed eemannennvoeved
ovee180s000 compaeneonebecaueemoeeenown eampee geeotyyes existee for cross-compaVson purpset.
Traditional pareetavc trios with both living pareets were eecountered foe onaa 45% ot the 229 victimt.
Ever more challeeging was the fact that 43 familiet of 2 to 5 indiviVuals were preseet among the victimt. A
pab ot ibeeticoi twint wat also presed on the plane andcoflU not be indiviVuallu ibeetibiee with DNA
testing. Neverthelest, the DNA testing lee to confi- deet einsAig analysis in the case of 418 victims OOV
weom refereece samples from close rela- tives oo personae effects were submitted (Leclair et aO 4000,
Leclair et al.2004t.
Tec efforts of the RCMP demonstratee a successful model Oor eow a mast disaster invet- tigation stoiiOl
be conductee. Tremeedout coopration it required from foreesic laVoratOt riet, law eeforcemeet personneO
sad famiia members of victimt, sftee from a numbea of counUiets in orier to successfuia iVeetify the victims
of mass fataOtu inciVeett.
Tec neee foa wiey availaVlc reeereecc samples was also eigUligUtee by this investiga- tion. In fact, a
formai recommeedation was made from the RCMP to the Canadian Transuoi SaSety Boari for all airline
personnel and any private citizees weo are frequeet Uiers toeave Ungerarints and DNA samples made
availaVie for igedti01cotion puraoscs if evea the neee arises. Teese records cannot be storee by the police
but rathee coulO be maintainee by the airline or storee in as indivifual’s saSety deeositUox.
Of the 224 victims of Swissair Fliggt 111, all 229 were positiveia iVeetiOiee, an astounding success
compaeedhopeevnouteiutedconvenhnonaendenhnencahnonhecennquetandoneheahwouednoheave beer
possible without the power of DNA typng with STR mariers.
The PentagonSite
Hifacaer by five terrorists on the mornina of Sertember 11, 2001, Americas Airlines FUnOt 77 crasEer
ino the Pevtagov sEorOy aftee 9:40 a.m. kllina all 59 passerae^ and crew on boarl, the 5 terrorists, aid 120
Pevtagov occkuagts. Tee remains, roiinina in see from ■'wiole bodies i smalt fragmevts, were tagev i Dovre
Air Force Bast in Delaware wfiere thee were sampler tor DNA teshna. From the 2000 cantainers oI eviVevcc
recovered. 938 sam- pies were mlOcml for DNA analysis. STR typina was thee performer at the Armer
Forces DNA Idevtificagov Lagoratora in Rockville, Marylaad usina ProIler PIUS. Refereec- samples
includer 40 direct refereec- bloodstain carOs from the Aimed Forces DNA Revository aid 340
familpererevces.
Ovee the caurse of the nert two months (Sevtembrc 17, 2001 ta Novembre 19, 2001), 177
iVevtifications were made usina DNA oniy or a cambination of DNA, (tm si recarOt, tnd finaeryrints. In
addition, tnr victim was iVevtifieV soleiy with devtal recarOs. Unfortunatelp, no biolovical materiai was
recaverer from the erase site for five of the miss- ina indiviVuals (Edson rt at. 2004). In addition, there were
five mate STR profiles that CSV not matcC referercc samples from asp of the victims. These samples were
classifier as belonaina ta the terrorist wlro hivacaer the plane and were furthre canfirmer usina mita-
caondrial DNA testina and camparison ta Nerr Eastern mtDNA haglotyprs (Edson et al.2004).
TABLE 9.1 summiro oO World Trade Ceeter Victim and Remains Ideetificvtion EUOUS CompleteC VS OC
Uunea009.AtWhvtWime, theeumberofVictimsstoodata749ofWhicO1059HadbeeeIdeetifiee.sixyead
later5unea810),BithsomeAdditionaldonefravmectslocateCandUrtherDnATeIting,Wevumbar
IdectifieCHadCdmbeCta 10209aseConaTotalo01 1,702RemainsRecaveeeC.AlthoughDnAfaeoutsWifii
otherMethodsirlTermsoOsuccessatRecovermgInformationirlThisDisaster,otherModaVtiesWereeseeui
inIdectifyingVictimsorsetsofRemains.InitialInformationCoudesyyfDr.RoVertsUaleraddMoreRecect
Information Coiii'lew oODr. Mede Prinz, new yyrO Cite oOico oOChieCMeCicaiexaminee.
Modality Victims Tdeetified Remains Sdentified
Photo 11 19 09 11 19 09
Vie we C 10 0 19 10 0 14
Body X-ray 0 3 3 0 9 4
Tattoos 0 6 6 0 6 6
Personal eCects 16 99 74 11 61 49
(a) MatcrialFlow
Personal Effect
Bone
Tissue
a) DataFlow
FIGURE 9.5 Illustration of (a) material aad a) data flow between laaoratoriri involved in processing World Trade
Certrr samples. Ladoratories included Office of Chiei Medicel Examines (OCME, New YorO Ciw), New YorO Swte Police asJYSP,
Adany, NY), Myriad Geneties (DaU Lake City, UT), Orcliin CellmarO (Dalds, TX), Celera Genomiet (Rockville, MD), and Bode
Tecknologg Group (Dpringfield, VA). Blue box celors renresent We cemmercial labs and yellow boxes hiahliaht We governmeet laas.
Physicel materials sUinpee betweee lanoratories includeC DNA exWacts (solnl red line), buccel swats from biologicel relative
reference samples (Dashed red line), personal effects (Dotted red line), recovered bones (soliC blue line), aad recovered tissue
(DasUed blue line). Note tOat most of We DNA samples were extracted at We NYSP and OCME lanoratories altOough some tissue aad
bone were sUinped directlo W Myriacd and Bode. Al Uones were exeated at Bode. Figure ceurteso of National Institute offi-istice
WorlU Trade Center KinsOin and DaW Analysis Panel aad New YorV Cite Offce of Cliief Medicel Examinee.
TABLE 9.2 World Trade Center kinship and Data Analysis Panel (WTC kADAP) Members Convened to Aid new
yorl Cite wVU WTC IdentiPcationi. national Institute oO Justice funded-Meetingi Were Held bimonthly from
octoOea 2001 I<OJICV 2003 in new yyrl City, Aldany, baltimore, or Washington, DC(noi
AllMembershttendenEvvryMeeting)toDiscasshrogesswithtUeInvestioationaddtoAidinReviewing
Tectnology Validation aad statistical genencassuei.
Member Afiliation
Uoan Bailee-Wilson, Ph.D. Nainal institutet of HealtU-Nationai Human Geeome Researck Institute
Les Biesecter, Ph.D. NaUonal institutet of HealtU-Nationai Human Geeome Researck Institute
ElizadetU Pugg, Ph.D. .ohn Hookins Universiu/Ceeter for Onheritee Disease Researd
(Condnued)
TABLE 9.2 World Trade Center kinship and Data Analysis Panel (WTC kADAP) Members Convened to Aid new
yorl Cite witO WTC IdentiPcationi. national Institute oO Justice funded-Meetingi Were Held bimonthly from
octoOea 2001 l<oUtv 2003 in new yyrk City, Aldany, baltimore, or Washington, DC(noi
AllMembershttendenEvvryMeeting)toDiscasshrogesswithtUeInvestioationaddtoAidinReviewing
Tectnolog Validation aad statistical genenc Issues.(Goniuec-
Member Affiliation
Rooeot Sealeo, Plr.D. New YorO Cite OfUcc of drier Metical Examineo
Steve Sheno', Plr.D. Naeonal institutes of Healte-National Ceeteo foo Biotecknology Infoomation
Jolrn SnySeo New YorO State Polia Contractoo
IDENTIFICATIONOFHUMANREMAINSINMASS
GRAVES USINGDNA
DNA cat plat at importadt roie in identifying remains in unmarOee gravet (Huffine 2001, Primorac
2204, Williams & Crew 2203). Unfortunately, tUere are regions oftUe world
BaVer, L. E., & Bades, E.g. (1000). Revniting families: An online clatanase th aid in the iVevtincehon of unde- mevteV immigrant remains,
go UWS ofForensie Sciences, 53, 00—53.
FBI national missing persons program, htth://www.fbi.gvv/wanten/kiclnan/kiclmiss.gtm .
Glod,M.gulyr l,0009).Neweathtorestoreinentitiesormissing:WensitecembinesUetailsorremains,0isanpeae- ances. Washington Posh.
Avoilabie at httf>://www.wasUingtonnost.cem/
Hollavd, M. M., ei O0 (1993). Mitvchondrial DNAsevueece avalysis of human skeletal remains: IdevtiVcation of remains from the Vietnam
Wve.JoumvO ofForensse Sciencei, 08, 040—553.
James, M., et aO (I000). Missing persons in Australio. Trendi indIssue in Crime and CriminaeJustice, 350, 1—6. Avoilanie ai http*://www
.aic.grv.ge .
Lorente, J. A., et aO (I000). Social yeneVn of non-criminal yenetie databases: Mnsing persons and human remains inentiVcation.
InternationalJournaI ofLevalyiedicine, 119, 197—190.
NationaO Centeo Lo Missing & Exploiter Children. htth://www.missingkins.cem/ .
Na Vvnallni ito teofaehcearVclee. http ://www,gna. gov/ idevtiLing-cersons/ missing-cersoni/ .
Na V onalHssingan dUniden tiLe dPersonshye tern (Nam UeI. http): / /www gamus. goe .
NationalCrirneInLrrnationCenter(NCIJ). htth://www.Li.crv/hq/cjish/ncic.gtm ,
Pearsall, B., & Weiss, D. M. (I019). Solving missing persons cases. NIJJournaO 264, 0—8. Awm at http/ww
.gclrs.crv/pdrilesl/na/228382.grf.
Piccinini, A., et aO (I019). WorO War One Italian and Austrian soldier inevtiacation perect: DNA results of the Ont case. Forensie Science
11X^101301 Genetice, 4, 330—333,
Ritter, N, (I007). Mnsing persons and unidevtideV remains: The nation’s silent mass disastes. NJJournaO 254, 0—1, Avoilanie at
htth://www.oee•cshnUcov/nijeoumalsW55/missing-cersons.gtml
Sweet, D., et aO (1999). Cdevtincation of a skeleton using DNA from teeth and a PAP Pmevc.JourncO ofLorensie ScienceJ, 44, 633-633,
Torwalt, C., et aO ,1005). Cervical smears as an alternative source of DNA in the idevtideetion of human skeletal remains, Canadian
Society of Forensic Sciencee JournaO J3, 195—169,
DVI Recommendations
AABB, (20 W. Guidelinea foe mass fatalihp DNA identiVcatiof oferatione. Avvilanic ai
hth://w7ww.uanb.uroW^ograms/WVasterre Jonse/Ducamenn/aanb I
Bradford L., et aO (2019). Disaster vctim investioahon recommendations from two simulated mass disaster scenae ios utilizen foe usee
accennnce tesing CODII 6.C. ForensOa Scienca Internationae/ Genelai (in press), doi: 19., 916/j, fsigev.2019.04.004
Budowle, B., et aO (2004). Forensia asoecy of mass disasters: SOaterie considerations for DNA-baseS human iVentV 0cation. LCXC/
Medicince D, 033—043,
International JVminaldolice Organization. (2008).(n tergoldisastervictimiden ndca insu VCvvilanieat hy://\wwv. integol. i
nt/Wublic/WisasterVictim/WeCau Joso ,
International JommitteerftheRenCross. (2004). Missingpeoplx DNAanalysisandidentid cation afhurnanrernains:A
guidetobee tora e acein armedcongie Oandr th ersituan onsofarm c dviolen ax ( ndeC. http ://www. icrc.o ng Wed 1
Wng
/siteenaa.usf/Wtmlall/w4410/$File/ICRC_002_4410.PDF ,
Lex J, eO aO (2000), Recommendations fos DNA lanoratorirs supporting disastes victim identification (CVI) onerations—Australian and
New Zealand cansensos on ISFG recommendations. Forensia Scienca Internationae/ Genetics 3D 54—6,
Lessig, Re X aO (201 9, German standarOs for forensia molecalas genetics investigations in cases of mass disastes victim identification
(CVI). Forensic Scienca Internationae Genedco D, 147—244.
National 11510X0 ofhusUcr. (2004). Masi fatality incidenh: A guide for Sumac forensic identiOcation. httoAwww.olo
.usUogouv/nCWubs-sum/194 774.htm ,
Nationai InsOtuto of JusOcx (20069 Lessoni learned from 9/H1 DNA identificationi io masi fataligs memento
htth://massfatalith.Una.oov,
Prinz,M.,etal. (2007).UNACommissionoftheIntervationalOocietppfforensicGenetics(ISFG):Recammendations reraroing the role of
forensic genetics Oor disaster victim iVentiVcation (CVI). Forensia Scienca Internationae/ GeneticJ 9 3—I?, Sweet, D, (20H).
(NTERPOL DVI best-bractice standarOs—an overview. Forensia Science Internationae 209 D—09 Westene A. A., et aO (2000).
Fem us, OV, rnd tooth sample calleckon for DNA analysis in disaster victim iVentiOcai
hon (DVI.: A method to minimize contamination risO. Forensia Science MedicinCe ant PathologSe DI 19—09
Airplane Crashes
Ballantynx, J. (1397). Mast disatter genetico Nature Genedn, 13., 329—351.
Goodwin, W., nt al. (1399). Thn use of mitocOondrial DNA and short tandem reneat tying in ths inentincohon of air crash victims,
ElectrophoresCy J0, 1777—1711.
Hso, C. M., nt al. (1399). Identification oVvictims of the 1399 Taoonan AirOus crash accinent using DNA analyse.
InternationalJournal of'Legal Medicinn, 113, 43—46.
Olaisen, B., nt al. (3997). Identification by DNA analysis of ths victims of ths August 3996 SpitsCeroen civV aircraft disastea. Naturn
Genetici, 15, 449—405,
Holland, M. M., et al. (2003). Development of a quality, high throughput DNA analysis procedure for skeletal samplesto assAt with the
igevtigcation oOvicems krom the WorlO Trade Cevter attacks. Croatian Me JOO-Joumat, 44, 264—072. Leclaie, B., st at. (2002). Bio
info rmahcs aai human igevtigcation is mass katality inciCevts: The WorlO Trade Cevtrr iisastee. Joumat of Forensic Sciences, 52, 804
—819.
National tnstitute of0usticr. (2004). Lessons learned from 9/19: DNA identifications in mass katality incidents. Availadlr ah
hh>://massfatality.dna.gov .
Ritter, N. (2002). dievtifyinh remains: Lessons learoeV from 9/19 NffJournat, 254, 20—24. Availadic at httu://www.oip.uskof
drv/nij/1ournalsW56/lessovs-learneX.html
Shale r, R. C. (2004). Who thev werv—insAc th? worlO traic center DNA story/ Th? unprecedented eJort to identify Uc miss- inp. New
YorO: Free Press.
VasUy, B. (2000). Out of OadeVy, igevtigcation innovation. JAMA/ Th?JournoO ofthe American Medical Association, 288, 1209-1223.
Hurricane Katrina
Dolan, S. MJ et ai. (2000). The emeroing role of genetics professionals in forensic kinskig DNA igevtigcation fol- lowing a mass
faUlitp: Lessons learned from Hurricane Katrina valunteers. Genetics in Medicinc, 29,214—412.
Donkervaort, S- et ae (2000). Enhancing acccrate eata cyPechov in mass Saality kinsOig igevtigcations: Lessons learned from
Hurricane Kaaina. Forensic Scienca VnternationaS/ Genedcs, 2, 254—360.
Otheo
Hartman, D., et ai. (2011). The 2000 Victorian BuskVres Disaster: The importanci of Guthric carOs avi offier meVC- CSS samples
for he direct matching of eisaster victims using DNA profiling. Forensic Science InternationaO 204., 24—65. Lin, C. -Y., et ae
(2019). The stratejies to DVI challenges in Typhoon Moradot. InternationaS^eournal ofaejal Medicine (in press)
(doi:10J907/s00414Y19Y479Y).
SUSVCS, H- et ai. (2000.. DNA analysis in peroetrator igevtigcation OC terrorism-related disaster: Suicige bombing OC the Australian
Embasso inAadarta 2004. ForensSa Science IntemationaS/ Genetics, 2, 251——57.
Mass Graves
Ale vizi, M. A., et aO (2000). ConchrVancc betaeev he AmpFlOTR Minidiler ani AmpFlOTR Idevtigler PCR Ampligcahon kit in the
Kuwaiti population. Ju urnce of Forensic Sciences, 54, 354—354.
Baraypar, J. P. (2000). When DNA is not availadle, ean we skO igentOp people? Recommendations tor best practice. Jour/naO of
Forensic Sciences, 55, 235—540.
Birus, V, et ai. (2005). How hioh sAoulO paternity CVCX be for reliadle igentigeation of war victims by DNA typing? Croatian
MedicoOAournaO 44, 332—356.
Cox, M- et ai. (2000(. The scientiSc investigation of mass graves/ TowarOs ArotocoSf ant standari operatic procedures. New YorO:
Cambridge University Press.
Davvren, J., et ai. (2002). HiohA edCchve DNA extraction methoi for nuclear sAort Saneem reneat testing of skei- rtal remains oom
mass graves. Croatian MedicoOAournaO 28, 472—484.
Gornffi, I- et ai. (2002(. The igentigeation OC war victims bp reverss paternia it associated with sipigcant risks OC falsa inclusion.
InternationarAournal of Lejal Medicinc, 1H, 254—04 2.
Huffine, E- et ai. (200 A Mas igentigeation OC pesocs missing oom the bread-ru OC the formes Yunoslavia: Structure, funchon, eve
role of the International Commission on Missing Persons. Croatian MedicoOAournaO, D, 071 —72.
Huffine, E- et ai. (2002(. Developing role of forensics in eeterring violence ani genocige. Croatian Medicrr AournaO, 44, 451—456(
Internationar Commission on MissinpPersons (ICMP). htth://www.ic-mp.dro -
Katun, S. K., et ai. (2002). Population suUstructure can sionigcadtly adCct reliadility of a DNA-YV process of igen-tigcation of mass
Satality victims. Jo urnce of Forensic Sciences, 50, 274—472.
Primorac, D. (2004(. The role of DNA technolog in igentgicahon of skeletal remains discoveren in mass graves. Forensic Science
dvternationaO, 246S, S115—SI 64.
Williams, E. D., & Crews, J. D. (2005). From iust to iust: Ethical ani practical issues invvlveV in the location, exhu- mahon, avci
igentigcaUon ofVodies Srom mass graves. Croatian MedicOAournaO J4J 04 DS).