Professional Documents
Culture Documents
What Is Strategy?: Professor Michael E. Porter Harvard Business School
What Is Strategy?: Professor Michael E. Porter Harvard Business School
COMPETING
COMPETING TO
TO BE
BE THE
THE COMPETING
COMPETING TO
TO BE
BE
BEST
BEST UNIQUE
UNIQUE
• The worst error in strategy is to compete with rivals on the same dimensions
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 2 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Flawed Concepts of Strategy
• Strategy as aspiration
– “Our strategy is to be #1 or #2…”
– “Our strategy is to grow…”
– “Our strategy is to be the world leader…”
• Strategy as action
– “Our strategy is to merge…”
– “… internationalize…”
– “… consolidate the industry…”
– “… outsource…”
• Strategy as vision
– “Our strategy is to meet our customers’ needs…”
– “…to advance technology for mankind…”
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 3 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Vision Statements
Autodesk
Transforming business by design
Avon
To be the company that best understands and satisfies the product, service and
self-fulfillment needs of women – globally.
Lafarge
To be the undisputed world leader in building materials
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 4 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Mission Statements
Leo Burnett
To be the best in the world bar none at building the most valued, leadership
brands.
Home Depot
The Home Depot is in the home improvement business and our goal is to
provide the highest level of service, the broadest selection of products and the
most competitive prices.
Unilever
Unilever's mission is to add Vitality to life.
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 5 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Setting the Right Goals
Economic
Economic Shareholder
Shareholder Value
Value
Performance
Performance
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 7 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Setting the Right Goals
Food Retailing
1.6
Whole Foods
1.4
1.2
Market
Value to 1.0 Average
Sales Ratio Food Retailing Publix
2004 Data 0.8 ROIC
0.6
0.4
Winn-
Dixie Kroger Safeway
Average Food
0.2 Albertson’s Supervalu Retailing Market
Value to Sales Ratio
Food Lion
0.0
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
ROIC Average
Source: Compustat (1999-2004)
Note: ROIC calculated as EBIT divided by Average Invested Capital (Total Assets less Excess Cash less Current Operating Liabilities)
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 8 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Economic Foundations of Competition
Causes of Profitability
Relative
Relative Position
Position
Industry
Industry Within
Within the
the
Structure
Structure Industry
Industry
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 9 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Determinants of Long-Term Industry Profitability
Threat of Substitute
Products or Services
Threat of New
Entrants
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 10 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Determinants of Relative Performance
Differentiation
(Higher Price)
Competitive
Competitive
Advantage
Advantage
Lower Cost
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 11 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Linking Strategy to Relative Performance
Southwest Airlines
Revenue and Cost per Available Seat Mile, Average of 1998 - 2000
12
Cents
per ASM
6
Operating Cost per
Available Seat Mile
0
Southwest Airline Industry Average
Note: ASM (Available Seat Miles) defined as total seats available multiplied by miles flown
Source: Airline annual reports and author’s calculations
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 12 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Identifying the Value Chain
Homebuilding
Firm Infrastructure
(e.g. Financing, Planning, Investor Relations)
Primary Activities
Operational Strategic
Effectiveness Positioning
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 14 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Five Tests of a Good Strategy
•• A
A unique
unique value
value proposition
proposition
compared
compared to
to other
other organizations
organizations
•• A
A different,
different, tailored
tailored value
value chain
chain
•• Clear
Clear tradeoffs,
tradeoffs, and
and choosing
choosing what
what
not
not to
to do
do
•• Activities
Activities that
that fit
fit together
together and
and
reinforce
reinforce each
each other
other
•• Continuity
Continuity ofof strategy
strategy with
with
continual
continual improvement
improvement in in realizing
realizing
the
the strategy
strategy
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 15 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Defining the Value Proposition
What
What Which
Which
Customers?
Customers? Needs?
Needs?
• A novel value proposition can also grow the pie/expand the industry
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 16 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Strategic Positioning
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
Distinctive
Distinctive
Value
Value Proposition
Proposition Activities
Activities
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 17 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Strategic Positioning
Whole Foods Markets
Distinctive
Distinctive
Value
Value Proposition
Proposition Activities
Activities
• Natural, fresh, organic, and prepared foods and • Well-lit, inviting supermarket store formats with
health items with excellent service at premium appealing displays and extensive prepared foods
prices sections
• Produce section as “theater”
• Educated, middle class, and affluent customers
• Café-style seating areas with wireless internet for
passionate about food as a part of a healthy meetings and meals
lifestyle • Each store carries local produce and has the authority
to contract with the local farmers
• Information and education provided to shoppers along
with products
• High touch in-store customer service via
knowledgeable, non-unionized, highly motivated
personnel
• Egalitarian compensation structure
• Own seafood procurement and processing facilities to
control quality (and price) from the boat to the counter
• Donates 5% of profits to non-profits
• Each store has “green projects,” directed by
employees to improve environmental performance
Sources of Tradeoffs
– Incompatible product / service features or attributes
– Differences in the best configuration of activities in the value chain to deliver
the chosen value proposition
– Inconsistencies in image or reputation across positions
– Limits on internal coordination, measurement, motivation, and control
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 19 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Strategic Tradeoffs
Neutrogena Soap (1990)
•• “Key”
“Key”Success
SuccessFactors
Factors
•• “Core”
“Core”Competencies
Competencies
•• “Critical”
“Critical”Resources
Resources
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 21 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Mutually Reinforcing Activities
Word-of- Zara Apparel Cutting-
mouth edge fashion
marketing at moderate
and repeat price and
buying Widely quality
popular
styles
Customers
chic but
Very cost-
Global
Little media frequent team of
conscious
advertising product trend-
changes spotters
Advanced
productio
Productio
n
n in
Extensive machiner
Europe
use of y
store
sales data
Tight
Prime store
coordination Very
locations in JIT delivery with 20
high traffic flexible
wholly-owned
areas factories
production
system
• Reinvention and frequent shifts in direction are costly and confuse the
customer, the industry, and the organization
• Continuity of strategy allows learning and change to be faster and more effective
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 23 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Barriers to Strategy
Flawed Concepts
Industry Pressures
• Industry conventional wisdom leads all companies to follow
common practices
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 24 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Barriers to Strategy
Internal Practices
• Inappropriate goals and performance metrics bias strategy choices
– Short time horizon
• Over-weighting of equity-based compensation amplifies unhealthy stock
market pressures
• Rapid turnover of leadership undermines the strategic direction to achieve
short-term performance benefits
• A desire for consensus undermines tradeoffs
• Inappropriate cost allocation lead to too many products, services, or
customers
• Outsourcing makes activities homogenous and less distinctive
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 25 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Strategy for What?
Defining the Right Business: Products
Product D Product E
Primary Activities
• The product line consists of well over • The product line consists of several
10,000 SKUs hundred SKUs
• Sales and service activities are carried • Customer relationships and services
out by local sales reps are specified by national contracts
• Value-added services, credit terms, and • Price is the key basis for selection;
distributors’ private-label products are customers do not purchase value-
valued and allow support product/service added services or private-label
differentiation products
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 27 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Strategy for What?
Defining the Right Business: Geography
Cross-
Cross-
Local
Local Regional
Regional National
National Global
Global
National
National
Primary Activities
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 29 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
Segmentation and Strategic Positioning
Automobile Insurance
Progressive
Progressive Geico
Geico
Customer Group Customer Group
• High-risk drivers shunned by standard • “Preferred”, lowest risk drivers
automobile insurers
•• A
A unique
unique value
value proposition
proposition •• Best
Best practice
practice improvement
improvement
versus
versus competitors
competitors •• Execution
Execution
•• Aspirations
Aspirations
•• A
A different,
different, tailored
tailored value
value chain
chain •• A
A vision
vision
•• Learning
Learning
•• Clear
Clear tradeoffs,
tradeoffs, and
and choosing
choosing what
what •• Agility
Agility
not
not to
to do
do •• Flexibility
Flexibility
•• Innovation
Innovation
•• Activities
Activities that
that fit
fit together
together and
and •• The
The Internet
Internet (or
(or any
any technology)
technology)
reinforce
reinforce each
each other
other •• Downsizing
Downsizing
•• Restructuring
Restructuring
•• Continuity
Continuity ofof strategy
strategy with
with •• Mergers
Mergers // Consolidation
Consolidation
continual
continual improvement
improvement in in realizing
realizing •• Alliances
Alliances // Partnering
Partnering
the
the strategy
strategy •• Outsourcing
Outsourcing
20060606 HSM Chicago – 06052006 Final NV.ppt 32 Copyright 2005 © Professor Michael E. Porter
The Role of Leaders in Strategy
• Lead the process of choosing the company’s unique position
– The CEO is the chief strategist
– The choice of strategy cannot be entirely democratic
• Measure progress against the strategy using metrics that capture the
implications of the strategy for serving customers and performing particular
activities
• Sell the strategy and how to evaluate progress to the financial markets