The document discusses key advances in coalbed methane technology including improved understanding of fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties, and advances in reservoir simulation. Three key technological advances are identified: improved understanding of production fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties like permeability and gas content, and advances in reservoir simulation. Coalbed methane production involves desorption of gas from coal matrix and flow through fractures. Maintaining low backpressure on wells is important for increasing recovery.
The document discusses key advances in coalbed methane technology including improved understanding of fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties, and advances in reservoir simulation. Three key technological advances are identified: improved understanding of production fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties like permeability and gas content, and advances in reservoir simulation. Coalbed methane production involves desorption of gas from coal matrix and flow through fractures. Maintaining low backpressure on wells is important for increasing recovery.
The document discusses key advances in coalbed methane technology including improved understanding of fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties, and advances in reservoir simulation. Three key technological advances are identified: improved understanding of production fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties like permeability and gas content, and advances in reservoir simulation. Coalbed methane production involves desorption of gas from coal matrix and flow through fractures. Maintaining low backpressure on wells is important for increasing recovery.
moting coalbed methane development in the World, however, new technology was the prim ary driver in making coalbed methane a comm ercial success. Price incentives or tax incentives were availabl e for coalbed methane production from 1978 t hrough the early 1980s, yet, significant develo pment did not begin until 1987 in USA. The coalbed methane research has prod uced three key technological advances i n reservoir engineering:
An Improved Understanding of the Fundament
als of Coalbed Methane Production
Advances in Measuring Reservoir Properties
Advances in Reservoir Simulation
Understanding the Fundamentals of Co albed Methane Production
Initially, research focused on understandi
ng the fundamental differences between coalbed methane and conventional reser voirs. The understanding of coalbed methane has advanced so that reservoir engineer s can evaluate new properties and mana ge production from existing wells over th e long term To successfully produce coalbed methane wells, it is essential to
identify factors that control production in
coal reservoirs. understand the relationship between gas content and sorption isotherm for specifi c developments, and maintain low backpressure on wells to in crease recovery. Each of these points is discussed below. Factors that Control Production in Coal Reservoirs
Production of gas is controlled by a three
step process i.e desorption of gas from t he coal matrix, diffusion to the cleat syst em, and flow through fractures Relationship Between Gas Content and Sorption Isotherm
Another mechanism that controls production is
the relationship of gas content to sorption isoth erm.
The sorption isotherm defines the relationship
of pressure to the capacity of a given coal to h old gas at a constant temperature. Gas conten t is a measurement of the actual gas contained in a given coal reservoir A coal reservoir is undersaturated if the a ctual gas content is less than the isother m value at reservoir temperature and pre ssure.
Accurate measurements of both gas con
tent and the isotherm are required to esti mate the production profile of the well Maintaining Low Backpressure on Wells
Gas production will not initiate until reser
voir pressure falls below the point where the gas content of the coal is in equilibriu m with the isotherm If the gas content of the reservoir is belo w the isotherm, then the reservoir will pr oduce only water initially.
Because of the relationship between gas
desorption and reservoir pressure, it is i mportant to produce coalbed methane w ells at the lowest practical pressure. Advances in Measuring Reservoir Prope rties.
In 1982, few references were available o
n testing coalbed methane wells.
Research on coalbed methane well testi
ng has produced several useful findings: Coal permeability is very sensitive to stre ss conditions. When performing injection /falloff tests on coal seams it is important to inject at very low rates to avoid fracturi ng the coal and to minimize stress effect s. High skin factors often are encountered when testing coal seams, especially whe n testing a cemented and cased well. The high skin factor often can be elimina ted by performing a breakdown treatmen t or small stimulation before testing. Absolute permeability of coal natural frac ture systems can be estimated from well tests performed under multiphase flow c onditions if accurate relative permeability curves are available. A wide variety of tests can be used to evalu ate coalbed methane wells
These include production or injection drill
stem tests, cased-hole production and inj ection tests, slug tests, tank tests, and te sts combined with production logging. Advances in Reservoir Simulation.
In 1980, GRI sponsored research to dev
elop a coalbed methane reservoir model and define coalbed methane production mechanisms.
Today, more than fifty coalbed methane s
imulators have been described in literatu re reviews. Integrated GRI reservoir studies in the San J uan Basin and Black Warrior Basin have pro duced the following key results: The most important properties to measure are coal thickness, cleat permeability, gas content, and the sorption isotherm.
Natural fracture (cleat) porosity in the San Jua
n basin is much lower than originally thought (0.25 percent vs. 2.0-4.0 percent). Lower poro sity implies lower water production and dispos al costs. Permeability estimated from well tests ge nerally correlates well with permeability p redicted by simulators.
Coal seam reservoir properties are heter
ogeneous and can vary widely from field to field and in some cases from well to w ell. Bottomhole pressure data and individual zone production data can give increased confidence when history matching single well and field cas es. Relative permeability curves generated from th e history match process tend to be steeper tha n core derived curves. Though core derived pe rmeability curves can be used as a starting poi nt, curves generated through history matching may provide a truer representation of the reser voir. METHANE EMISSIONS IN MINING
Natural ventilation (cracks in coal layers
and adjoining rocks) Coal mine emissions Underground mines Surface coal mining Coal enrichment, transportation and usa ge Methane recovery from coal seams provide s a number of benefits.
frequent accidents
can be recovered and sold
reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
substitute for fuel.
Methane emissions from coal mines can be reduced by recovering and using met hane from underground mines and by ox idating of methane from ventilation air. methane recovered from underground mi nes may be sold to natural gas compani es, used to generate electricity, used on- site as fuel for drying coal,. The oxidization of coal mine ventilation a ir produces heat that can be used directl y on-site or to produce electricity.
The oxidization technology has been suc
cessfully demonstrated in Great Britain. Carbon dioxide emissions per unit of ele ctricity generated are typically in the orde r of: Brown Coal: 1,180 tonnes per GWh Black coal: 25 tonnes per GWh Coalbed methane: 600 tonnes per GWh USES OF COAL BED METHANE
Mine boilers – switching from coal to ga
s: Motor fuel Cleaning of recovered substances and m ethane supply to natural gas pipelines Electricity generation (diesel generators, gas turbines, internal-combustion engine s) Supporting mine operations Sales to the power grid Technological raw materials (metallurgy, fertilizers, methanol) Community needs (heat and electricity) o f adjacent territories INDIAN SCENARIO Essar initiated the first CBM project in India.
Targeting the deep coals of Cambay Basin of
Gujarat, Essar started the project at Mehsana.
Essar is today indigenously producing methan
e form one of the three wells drilled India's Directorate General of Hydrocarb on (DGH) has identified nine blocks in fo ur states - Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal for exploration and production of CBM that will be offere d for bidding. Fields No. of Blocks 1. Raniganj (3) 2. Jharia (2) 3. E. Bokaro & W. Bokaro (2) 4. Satpura (1) 5. Singrauli - 6. Sohagpur (2) 7. Talcher 8.Chanda-Wardha 9.Godavari Valley 10.Tertiary Coal fields of NE 11.Gujarat (Sub-Surface Coal) 12.Neyveli Lignite 13.J & K Coal Fields 14.Palana-Rajasthan Accordingly, a Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Explo itation Project has been formulated by the DG H with the help of the Ministry of Petroleum an d Natural Gas. The project involves four phases : Phase 1 : Exploration Phase 2 : Pilot Assessment and Market Confirmation Phase 3 : Development Phase 4 : Production In the immediate context only Phase 1 is being considered and, to start with, the s hallow depth coalbeds of the Lower Gon dwanas of the eastern and central parts of Peninsular India will be on offer. The areal extent of these beds is of the o rder of 11000 sq. kms, made up of :
2800 sq. kms in the Raniganj, Jharia, Ea
st Bokaro and West Bokaro coal fields in the Damodar Valley belt; and, 8200 sq. kms in the Sohagpur and Satpu tra coal fields of Central India.