Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Grounding in US Gulf Port
Grounding in US Gulf Port
The subject vessel was a large bulk carrier with nine holds and with the bridge,
engine room, and accommodation aft. She was let on a time charter and was
carrying a cargo of wheat, loaded in all holds, from the U.S. Gulf to Europe. The
general average adjustment in this case was made according to the “York-Antwerp
Rules, 1974”.
Day 1
The vessel sailed from the load port during the morning and proceeded
downstream under the Master’s orders and the pilot’s advice. At 1626 hours, the
vessel touched bottom. The various attempts to free her using the helm and
engines failed. With the assistance of the pilot boat, it was established that the
vessel was aground 200 feet to the west of the channel, resting on a bottom of soft
mud and silt. It was also established that two channel buoys used to position the
vessel were 300 feet west of their charted location. It was calculated that the
vessel was 17,000MT aground.
Owners retained a local Salvage Master and tugs to try and free the vessel.
Days 2-4
Three attempts to free the vessel using up to eight tugs failed. The owners
terminated the services of the local Salvage Master.
Days 5-13
During this period, a local firm was contracted to remove a portion of the cargo
with vacuvators into a lightning vessel, chartered by the owners. Due to the poor
performance of the vacuvators and a dispute over the employment of stevedores,
this method was abandoned. The small amount of cargo discharged was reloaded.
An international salvage company was then retained to take charge of the operation
on the basis of cost plus fifteen percent. A program was planned to dredge a
channel from the bow of the vessel to the main navigational channel and also to
create a channel along the port side of the vessel. Additional dredging was
proposed around the ship’s side to break the suction imposed by the mud.
Days 14-20
The dredging operations were commenced and completed.
Day 21
Five tugs were engaged to pull the vessel into the dredged channel and into the
main channel. The attempt failed as the ground reaction was too great to allow the
vessel to float free.
Days 22 -27
All the interested parties agreed that the best course of action was to
Discharge 1 7,000 MT of cargo to enable the vessel to refloat. A crane barge and two
Cargo barges were located, inspected, and brought to the vessel
Days 28 -36
The discharge of the cargo into approved barges began The parties decided to
load both barges while the weather was fine rather than risk a twenty-four hour
delay in a refloating attempt in which time the weather may have deteriorated
Day 37
A total of 15,000 MT of cargo was discharged Four tugs were engaged, and the
vessel was successfully refloated
Days 38 43
The vessel berthed at the nearest facility which could accommodate her for
reloading of the discharged cargo Extensive survey work was undertaken to ensure
that no damage had occurred to the hull, machinery, or cargo during the grounding.
After bunkering, the vessel sailed for her original destination
The following parties were involved in this particular salvage operation:
• Cost of tugs to refloat the vessel, including the value of any salvage award
• Cost of running ship s engines and other equipment to assist refloating
• Cost of discharging cargo into lighters and the cost of reloading
• Cost of pollution removal if cargo has been jettisoned and the value of the lost cargo
• Stores consumed and wages paid to crew during the general average incident
Who are the interested parties ?
• Ship owner
• Owner’s interest in the venture is determined by the current value of the vessel at
the termination of the venture. Time charter hire is normally excluded
from owners total interest but may be included depending on the terms of the
charter. In voyage charters, the amount of bunkers onboard would be included in
the ship owners valuation
• time charterer
• Time charterer’s interest in the venture is determined by the value of bunkers
remaining onboard at the time of the incident, plus the freight at risk on
the voyage
• cargo owner
• Cargo owner’s interest is determined by the sound market value of the cargo on
the last day of discharge
When is general average declared?
The declaration is normally made by the ship owner but in
certain countries anyone of the interested parties may initiate
an adjustment.
A declaration must be made before the delivery of the cargo.
Ship owners usually will allow delivery of the cargo when the
other interested parties to the venture provide
suitable security sufficient to cover their contribution
The Master's role
The Master must be prepared to assume the widest possible role in solving all the problems created by an
incident if there is an urgent need to do so and assistance is not readily available