Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LPRD 3 - Ingles - Canabis
LPRD 3 - Ingles - Canabis
Clinical case
STUDENTS:
BENAVIDES LUNA ANTHONY NICK
ISAGUIRRE ECHEVARRIA ROXANA LIZ
FLORES LOPEZ OLGA JOHANNA
LOZA TAIPE MARLYN GABRIELA
NEVENKA CAROLINA HEREDIA
ZEGARRA
CARLOS DANIEL LAGUNA BARRIOS
INTRODUCTION
PRESENT DISEASE:
Endomorphic type,
shows symptoms
of anxiety
manifests having
the sensation of
accelerated
thinking with
delusional ideas. 5
DISCUSSION
Despite these characteristics of some of the reviews studied, it was possible to confirm that the effects of chronic marijuana
use are located especially in the areas of memory and executive functions, with repercussions mostly described in recent or
working memory by the side of memory and in the skills for decision-making and motivation that include executive
functions.
INFORMED CONSENT
After the consultation sessions, the patient has shown a picture of
drug dependence, insomnia, anxiety attacks and overweight
(prone to diabetes), he needs immediate treatment to avoid
physical or mental damage as a result of the permanence of said
condition.
VARIABLES AND
INSTRUMENTS
The techniques that have been
used for the evaluation of
cannabis use have been the
following:
1. Semi-structured interview of cannabis use: a model of interview where it is intended to
collect the sociodemographic data of the person, environment social and consumption-
related variables.
2. Questionnaire on drug use (Cebrián, 2013): this questionnaire is made up of 12 items
with a different response structure for each of them.
3. CAST (Legleye and Beck, 2007): with this instrument it has been tried to obtain
information about problems arising from cannabis use in the past 12 months. This made
up of 6 items, designed to detect the use of cannabis abuse in the population young
and adolescent.
4. SDS (Kraus, 2008): with this instrument it has been tried to measure the degree of
dependence experienced by the person in terms of cannabis use, specifically aspects more
psychological dependency.
RESULTS
Below are the results obtained
from the person in each of
the scales administered:
1. CAST: a score of 18 has been obtained, which is interpreted as that
the person presents a risk dependence in terms of cannabis use.
2.SDS: a score of 13 has been obtained, which is interpreted as that
the person is deeply dependent on cannabis use.
3.EAR: a score of 27 has been obtained, it is interpreted as a degree
of self-esteem medium, the person does not have serious self-
esteem problems but is considered It is convenient to improve some
aspects of it.
CONCLUSIONS
On the other hand, when it is possible to verify
that consumption has been for a long time, that
is, of 15 years or more of consumption, where
it would be considered chronic, and in turn, a
high frequency of consumption is added,
neuropsychological alterations and the brain
structural changes are clearly identifiable and
their levels of deterioration are severe in
people's lives since they tend to be irreversible.
RECOMMENDATIONS
When the intervention process is carried out,
it takes place in a warm and empathetic
environment where the priority of the
process is the user.
It is advisable not to confront the user, or
judge yourself or make him feel guilty as this
interferes with the therapeutic process.
THANKS
14