Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

CORRUPT

ION
10

5
4
3
1
9
8
7
6
2

Presented
by: Harney Flor
Erick Cendaña
Bragas
Mitzi Estellero Mary Joy Cabil
Melanie Samsona
INTRODUCTION
TO
10

5
4
3

1
9
8
7
6
2

CORRUPTION
CORRUPTION
CATEGORIES OR TYPES
- is the abuse of FORMS OF
BASED ON SECTORS
entrusted power CORRUPTION:
Related Legal
for private gain. It  GRAND CORRUPTION
Terms and Issues: Bribery
 PETTY CORRUPTION
includes GRAND,
Extortion
 SYSTEMIC
PETTY, and CORRUPTION
10

Cronyism
5
4
3

1
Bribery

2
9
8
7
6

SYSTEMIC,  GOVERNMENT

Embezzlement Nepotism
CORRUPTION
POLITICAL, Government corruption
Parochialism
Extortion
GOVERNMENT, may be broken down into
Patronage
three categories:
JUDICIAL,
Transparencyand  POLITICAL
Note: corruption
POLICE
can
Influence

be defined
peddling
CORRUPTION
JUDICIAL
in many ways Graft CORRUPTION
depending how you
CORRUPTION.  POLICE
Embezzlement
understand corruption itself. CORRUPTION
MEASURING CORRUPTION
Global
Transparency Corruption
Bribe Payers
in Corporate
Corruption Promoting
Barometer
Index
Reporting
Perceptions Index Revenue
is the best known tools Transparency
is the only world-wide
10

ranks
of TI, the likelihood of
5
4

3
1
public opinion survey
9
8
7
6

2
assesses most
the widely
disclosure of
steps companies
these
used companies
from
indicator have
28
of on corruption.
focuses It
on the extractive
in place to fight corruption. industries, evaluating
leading economies
corruption worldwide. to addresses people'sand
It also looks at companies' comparing the degree of
win resources-
Firsttransparency
launched in 1995,
footprint direct experiences
revenue transparency
resources-business
it has
across 177been widely
countries: to with bribery
currently and
demonstrated by
whatabroad
credited with
extent byputting
are paying
earnings details their views
major companies and on
the issue and taxes inbribes.
specific
of corruption corruption
resource-richin the main
countries.
countries made public.
on the international institutions in their
policy agenda. countries.
REPORTING ANTI-CORRUPTION
MEASURES

GENERAL CORRUPTION
Defence Companies
STATISTICS
Government
Anti-Corruption Index
Nearly half of workers across
Europe, the Middle East, Africa and
Defence Anti-
It India think
analyses anti-corruption and
bribery and corruption Corruption
arecompliance systems in 129
10

acceptable ways to survive an


Index
5

4
3
1
9
8
7
6

2
defencedownturn.
economic companiesMorearound.
than 40
percent of employees
This index at board
is the first and
global
senior manager
analysis level said
of corruption risk that
in
sales or cost establishments
defence numbers had been measures the risk
manipulated by their company.
worldwide. This index does
This included reporting revenue
of corruption in 82
not
early tomeasure corruption.
meet short-term It
financial national defense
assesses
targets, companies costs
under-reporting basedto establishments
disclosure
meet of ethics
budget targets, andand anti-
requiring
corruption
customers practices.
to buy unnecessary
around the world.
stock to meet sales targets.
CAUSES OF CORRUPTION

I. Personal III.Institutional
Low Pay scales/ Wages
Personal greed
Lack of Strict and fast
Low awareness or
punishments
lack of courage to
denounce corrupt behavior
10

5
4
Lack of Unity in public

3
1
9
8
7
6

2
and situations conducive to
corruption.
Lack of transparency in
affairs and deals

II. Cultural Lack of state funding to


elections
Cultural environments that
condone corruption Lack of accountability

Encouragement of unhealthy
competition
CORRUPTION IN THE PHILIPPINES

High corruption levels severely


 Judicial System
restrict the efficiency of businesses
operating in the Philippines.  Police
Extensive bribery within the public  Public Services
administration and vague and  Land
complex laws make foreign
Administration
10

companies vulnerable to extortion

5
4
3
1
9
8
7

6
2
and manipulation by public officials.  Tax Administration
Favoritism and undue influence are  Customs
widespread in the courts, leading to Administration
time-consuming and unfair dispute
resolution, and to an uncertain
 Public
business environment. Corruption Procurement
plagues the customs  Natural Resources
administration, and fraud routinely  Legislation
occurs for companies when filing
import and export documentation.
EFFECTS OF CORRUPTION

ON PEOPLE ON SOCIETY
POSITIVE
Transferring of wealth from
Disregard for
upper class to officials
lower class
Lack of quality in services
Lack of respect for
ON
Lack of ECONOMY
proper justice Reduces unemployment
rulers
10

5
4
3
1
Chances of
9
8

7
6
2
Lack of faith and trust
Promotion
Unemployment
Decrease in foreign on the governments
Poor Health and hygiene
investment Sustenance of life and
Aversion for joining
Delay inPollution
growth economic advantage
the posts linked to
Accidents
Lack of development corruption
Corruption is an excellent
Failure of genuine way of increasing product
research sales of a company even if it
assures low quality
POLICY OPTIONS TO ERADICATE CORRUPTION
CREATING TRANSPARENCY
END IMPUNITY
AND OPENNESS IN
PAYING CIVIL SERVANTS WELL
ESTABLISHING  GOVERNMENT SPENDING
Empower
Whether
Citizens
INTERNATIONAL
CUTTING civilRED TAPE
servants are
Effective law enforcement is
essential
Subsidies,totax ensure the
exemptions,
appropriatelyCONVENTIONS
compensated or corrupt are punishedof
public procurement and
grosslyStrengthening
The underpaid
high correlation citizen’s
will clearly affect
between REPLACING
break
goods the
andcycle of impunity,
services, soft
motivation
the incidence and incentives.
of corruption If public
and or freedom
credits, from punishment
demand for
Because anti-corruption
in a globalized REGRESSIVE extra-budgetary
AND
10

the extentsectorof wages are too low,


bureaucratic or loss.under
funds Successful
the control of
themred

5
4
3
1
9

8
7
6
2
and empowering
employees economy
may find corruption
themselves to DISTORTING
enforcement
politicians—all approaches
are elementsare
tape as captured,
increasingly has a for instance,
cross-border
under pressure hold
to government
supplement their supported by aways
of the various strong in legal
incomes by
dimension, thetheDoing
in “unofficial” Business
international
ways. Van SUBSIDIES
framework,
which WITH
law enforcement
governments manage
accountable
indicators suggests is
(2001) the
a
legal framework
Rijckeghem
sustainable
for
and Weder corruption did TARGETED
branches
public and an CASH
resources.
some
control is a keyapproach
desirability
empirical ofelement
workeliminating
showing that
among as
that independent
Governmentsand effective
collect taxes,
helps many
in to needless
build
a samplethe of
optionsregulations
mutual
less trust
developed
open to TRANSFERS
court
tap system.
the capitalCivil society
markets to
while safeguarding
countries, there is an inversethe can
raisesupport
money,the process
receive with
foreign
between
governments.
relationship
citizens
This
between
framework and
the level of of
essential
has improved regulatory functions
significantly over initiatives such as
aid and develop
public sector government.
wagesthe and
state.the Transparency
mechanisms to International’s
allocate
the past decade.
incidence of corruption. Unmask the Corrupt
these resources to satisfy a
campaign.
multiplicity of needs.
INTERNATIONAL AND FOREIGN
LAW ON BRIBERY AND FOREIGN CORRUPT
CORRUPTION PRACTICES ACT (FCPA)
Examples of international
frameworks, which are ratified by In addition, the provisions of
PHILIPPINE
respective LAW
member AGAINST
states the US Foreign Corrupt
include: Practices Act (FPCA) will
 
GRAFT & CORRUPTION affect the operations of
OECD Convention on Combating many multinational
Bribery of Foreign Public Officials companies, besides those
Executive Order No. 268
(1997) primarily based in the US.
10

The FCPA established

5
4
3
1
8
7
6
9

2
Creating The National Anti- criminal and civil penalties
UN Convention against Corruption
Corruption Commission And Abolishing for unlawful payments or
(2003). bribes (or promises of
The Presidential Commission
Against Graft And Corruption payments) to foreign
The Anti-Corruption Standards and officials for the purpose of
Created Under Executive Order 151, S.
Frameworks (produced by the obtaining or keeping
1994, As Amended.
Institute of Business Ethics) provides business, either directly or
 
an overview of selected international indirectly or through agents,
private sector standards seeking to to influence any act or
combat bribery and corruption. It sets decision or to secure any
out the content and implementation improper advantage in order
requirements of each standard. to obtain or retain business.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
CORRUPTION PERCEPTION
INDEX 2017
POLICE AND ELECTED OFFICIALS NAMED MOST
CORRUPT

You might also like