The document discusses the rules around refreshing a witness's memory under Sections 159-161 of the Indian Evidence Act. It provides details on what types of documents a witness can refer to (their own notes, others' notes, copies) to refresh recollection. It also summarizes that the witness need only testify to the facts recorded, not every detail, and that the opposing party can inspect and cross-examine on documents used for refreshing.
The document discusses the rules around refreshing a witness's memory under Sections 159-161 of the Indian Evidence Act. It provides details on what types of documents a witness can refer to (their own notes, others' notes, copies) to refresh recollection. It also summarizes that the witness need only testify to the facts recorded, not every detail, and that the opposing party can inspect and cross-examine on documents used for refreshing.
The document discusses the rules around refreshing a witness's memory under Sections 159-161 of the Indian Evidence Act. It provides details on what types of documents a witness can refer to (their own notes, others' notes, copies) to refresh recollection. It also summarizes that the witness need only testify to the facts recorded, not every detail, and that the opposing party can inspect and cross-examine on documents used for refreshing.
We humans, sometimes tend to forget things and it is
extremely important to keep remembering the entirety of the facts if we have been called as a witness. Someone’s life could be at the line and our statements may help the Court to serve justice to someone. A witness may be under a lot of pressure and due to all the stress, he might need to refresh his memory. Section 159 to 161 of the Indian Evidence Act, lay down the provisions relating to "Refreshing memory"
Section 159 Section 159 of the Evidence Act says that a witness can refresh his memory while under examination. He may do so by referring to an writing made by himself at the time of the event taking place regarding which he has been questioned, or a while later as long as the Court considers it to be fresh in his memory. The witness can also refer to someone else’s notes prepared within the aforementioned time frame, and decide whether it is correct or not. The Section further says that the witness may use a copy or photocopy of a document with the permission of the Court in order to refresh his memory. A witness who heard a speech ma refer to his memory by referring to a newspaper account of it if he read it soon afterwards, and if, at the time he read it, he knew it to be correct. Section 160 This section states that a witness must testify to the facts that were mentioned in any such document as mentioned in Section 159. It is irrelevant whether he remembers all the facts that were recorded with every little detail as long as he is certain that the facts have been recorded correctly by him. The fundamental difference between Section 159 and Section 160 is that: The former talks about the recollection of memory and not the document. Whereas, in the latter, the document itself becomes evidence of the facts mentioned therein. Section 161 This section states that any writing or document mentioned in the last two sections above must be produced and provided to the opposite party if they require it. The opposite party may cross-examine the witness over the document if the need be. When a document is produces under Section 161, it becomes subject to a general inspection and cross-examination on the portion referred to by the witness does not make the document evidence against the cross-examiner.
Rule of Refreshing Memory Section 159 to Section 161 of the Indian Evidence Act, provide for certain rules to enable the witnesses to refresh their memory as follows : 1) The witness is permitted to refer his own writing at the time of the transaction. The Court does not prescribe any precise time. It may allow even few weeks, for the purpose. (Section 159). 2) The witness is also permitted to refer the writing made by others. He must read the writing within a prescribed time (Section 159). 3) The Court permits the witness to refer a copy of the document to refresh his memory. The witness must prove it as a true copy of the original (Section 159). 4) An expert may refresh his memory by reference to professional Treaties. 5) The witness need not have specific recollection of the facts (Section 160). 6) The adverse party has a right to inspect the writing and to cross examine the witness (Section 160).
Case law It has been made clear in the case of Pran Dutt v. State of Uttar Pradesh (199 AIR 523) that a statement of record by the investigating officer such as police reports, under Section 161 is not usable for contradicting a witness.
Study Material Law of Evidence-I B.A.Ll. B (Hons) V Semester Unit-2 Relevancy of Facts Section 8 Motive, Preparation and Previous or Subsequent Conduct: Any Fact Is Relevant