Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Internal Analysis: Resources, Capabilities, and Activities: Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin Reserved
Internal Analysis: Resources, Capabilities, and Activities: Mcgraw-Hill/Irwin Reserved
4
Internal Analysis:
Resources,
Capabilities, and
Activities
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Part 1 Strategy Analysis
4–2
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firm’s resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firm’s resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
4–3
Chapter Case 4 From Good to Great to Gone:
• Circuit City
Internal focus
Core Competencies
Strategic Fit
Internal strengths change with the
external environment
4–5
EXHIBIT 4.1 Creating Strategic Fit to Leverage Internal Strengths
4–6
The Role of Strategy in Business is to Generate and
Sustain Value via the Linkages Between Position,
Organization, and Resources
Positioning
4–7
Positioning
Geographic scope
Vertical integration
decisions
Organization
• Structure
Formal definition of authority
Conflict resolution
• Systems
Rules, routines, evaluation and rewards
• Processes
Informal communication, networks, and recruitment
4-9
Resources and Capabilities
• Tangible resources
e.g., physical capital
• Organizational capabilities
e.g., routines and standard operating procedures
• Intangible resources
e.g., trademarks, “know-how”
Knowledge
Knowledge Types
Types and
and
Knowledge
Knowledge Conversion
Conversion
Levels
Levelsof
ofknowledge
knowledge
Individual Organization
Organization
Individual
Databases
Information Systems & procedures
Explicit
Explicit Facts Intellectual property
Scientific kn. ‘INDUSTRIAL’
Types
Types ENTERPRISES
of
of
Knowledge
Knowledge CRAFT
ENTERPRISES
Tacit
Tacit Skills Organizational
capabilities
4–11
EXHIBIT 4.2 Linking Resources and Capabilities to Firm Performance
EXHIBIT 4.3 Company Examples of Core Competencies & Applications
4–13
Canon:
Canon: Products
Products and
and Core
Core Technical
Technical Capabilities
Capabilities
Precision Fine
Mechanics Optics
Micro-
Electronics 4–14
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firm’s resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based
view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firm’s resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis. 4–15
EXHIBIT 4.4 Tangible and Intangible Resources
4–16
Appraising
Appraising Resources
Resources
RESOURCE CHARACTERISTICS INDICATORS
• Google Example
Tangible resources valued at $5 billion
Intangible brand valued at over $100 billion
Googleplex has both tangible and intangible aspects
4–18
Two Critical Assumptions in RBV
• Resource heterogeneity
Bundles of resources and capabilities differ across firms
Southwest Airlines and Alaska Airlines have different
resources
SWA
• Resource immobility
Resources tend to be “sticky” and do not move easily
Southwest Airlines sustained advantage
Severaldecades superior performance
Competitors have unsuccessfully imitated SWA model
4–19
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firm’s resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive
implications of a firm’s resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
4–20
EXHIBIT 4.5 Applying RBV: Decision Tree Competitive Implications
The
The Rent-Earning
Rent-Earning Potential
Potential
of
of Resources
Resources and
and Capabilities
Capabilities
THE EXTENT OF THE Scarcity
COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
ESTABLISHED Relevance
Durability
THE PROFIT
EARNING POTENTIAL SUSTAINABILITY OF THE Mobility
OF A RESOURCE OR COMPETITIVE
CAPABILITY ADVANTAGE Replicability
Property rights
Relative bargaining
APPROPRIABILITY power
Embeddedness of
resources
STRATEGY
STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT
HIGHLIGHT 4.1
4.1 How Nintendo Focused on
the Casual Gamer
Competition continues…
1–23
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firm’s resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firm’s resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
4–24
The Value Chain
• Primary Activities
Add value directly in transforming inputs into outputs
Raw materials through production to customers
The Value Chain
General administration
Technology development
Procurement
Indirectly add value Adapted from Exhibit 3.1 The Value Chain: Primary and Support Ac tivities
Source: Adapted with permission of The Free Press, a division of Simon &
Schuster, Inc., from Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining
Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 3-4
80
Profit
70
Marketing: Promotions
60
Marketing: Advertising
Cents per unit
50
Outbound logistics
40
Operations: Manufacturing
30 Operations: Packaging
20 Operations: Ingredients
10
90
80
Profit
70
Marketing: Promotions
60
Marketing: Advertising
Cents per unit
50
Outbound logistics
40
Operations: Manufacturing
30
20 Operations: Packaging
10 Operations: Ingredients
0
Hostess Little Debbie Ontario Baking Savory Pastries
4–29
Strategic Coherence
The Logic of How The Business Fits Together:
Limited No
No seat
passenger connections
assignments
amenities with other
airlines
Short-haul,
point-to-point
Frequent, Limited use routes between
reliable 15-minute of travel Standardized midsize cities
departures gate agents fleet of 737 and secondary
turnarounds aircraft airports
Automatic
ticketing
Lean, highly machines
High
productive Very low
compensation
of employees ground and ticket prices
gate crews
High
Flexible High level “Southwest,
aircraft
union of employee the low-fare
stock utilization airline”
contracts
ownership
31
Strategic Coherence
• A fit among corporate, business, and functional strategy;
4–32
Strategic Coherence
• Combining activities that complement and reinforce one
another. These activities dovetail together to help achieve
the overall objectives of the firm.
4–33
Strategic Coherence
• A sustainable competitive advantage often requires trade-
offs. These tradeoffs arise for at least three reasons:
• Vanguard Example
A global investment firm - $1.4 trillion managed assets
Emphasis on low customer cost and quality service
4–35
EXHIBIT 4.7 Vanguard Group’s Activity System 1997
Legend
Core
Support
4–36
EXHIBIT 4.8 Vanguard Group’s Activity System 2011
Legend
Core
Support
4–37
Dynamic Capabilities Perspective
4–38
EXHIBIT 4.10 Role of Inflows & Outflows in Building Stocks
4–39
STRATEGY
STRATEGY HIGHLIGHT
HIGHLIGHT 4.2
4.2 IBM’s Dynamic Strategic Fit
• Moved IBM downstream toward services and thus higher value added
1–40
EXHIBIT 4.9 IBM Product Scope 1993 and 2010
4–41
LO 4-1 Distinguish among a firm’s resources, capabilities, core
competencies, and firm activities.
LO 4-2 Differentiate between tangible and intangible resources.
LO 4-3 Describe the critical assumptions behind the resource-based view.
LO 4-4 Apply the VRIO framework to assess the competitive implications
of a firm’s resources.
LO 4-5 Identify competitive advantage as residing in a network of firm
activities.
LO 4-6 Outline how dynamic capabilities can help a firm sustain
competitive advantage.
LO 4-7 Identify different conditions that allow firms to sustain their
competitive advantage.
LO 4-8 Conduct a SWOT analysis.
4–42
How to Protect a
Competitive Advantage
2. Path Dependence
Current alternatives are limited by past decisions
U.S. is the only industrial nation not on the metric system
Honda’s core competency in gas engines took decades to build
4–43
The
The Evolution
Evolution of
of Honda
Honda Motor
Motor Company
Company
1948 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995
3. Causal Ambiguity
Cause of success or failure are not apparent
Why has Apple had such a string of successful products?
– Role of Steve Jobs’ vision?
– Unique talents of the Apple design team?
– Timing of product introductions?
4. Social Complexity
Two or more systems interact creating many possibilities
A group of 3 people has 3 relationships
4–45
EXHIBIT 4.11 Strategic Questions in the SWOT Analysis
4–46