Section 39 of the Indian Penal Code defines "voluntarily" as causing an effect by means intended to cause it, or means known or believed to be likely to cause it. An act is considered voluntary if the person intended or knew the act was likely to cause the effect, even without intent to cause that specific effect. Case examples show the definition of voluntarily being applied to cases involving death, grievous hurt, and other offenses under the IPC where intent was not directly present but likelihood of the effect was known.
Section 39 of the Indian Penal Code defines "voluntarily" as causing an effect by means intended to cause it, or means known or believed to be likely to cause it. An act is considered voluntary if the person intended or knew the act was likely to cause the effect, even without intent to cause that specific effect. Case examples show the definition of voluntarily being applied to cases involving death, grievous hurt, and other offenses under the IPC where intent was not directly present but likelihood of the effect was known.
Section 39 of the Indian Penal Code defines "voluntarily" as causing an effect by means intended to cause it, or means known or believed to be likely to cause it. An act is considered voluntary if the person intended or knew the act was likely to cause the effect, even without intent to cause that specific effect. Case examples show the definition of voluntarily being applied to cases involving death, grievous hurt, and other offenses under the IPC where intent was not directly present but likelihood of the effect was known.
Submitted By- Apoorv Salar Submitted to- Mr. Eesh Singh Subject- Law Of Crimes Topic- Voluntarily (Section-39 IPC) Section- A Section 39 IPC- Voluntar ily Voluntarily”. —A person is said to cause an effect “voluntarily” when he causes it by means whereby he intended to cause it, or by means which, at the time of employing those means, he knew or had reason to believe to be likely to cause it. Explanation The section gives the word ‘voluntarily’ a meaning which is different from its popular sense. The word has been defined in relation to causing an effect. When one causes an effect by means whereby he has intention to cause it or which, at the time of employing those means, he had knowledge to be likely to cause it or had reason to believe to be likely to cause it, he acts voluntarily. Therefore, intention, knowledge or reason to believe the likelihood of causing an effect have been given importance under this section. Examples A is Driving at a speed of 80 KMps in a narrow lane, risks are that someone might get hurt, and someone died it will be as A has voluntarily done the said act. A set fire, by night to an inhabited house in a large town, for the purpose of facilitating a robbery and thus causes the death of a person. Here, A may not have intention to cause death and may even be sorry that death has been caused by his act, yet, if he knew that he was likely to cause death, he has caused death voluntarily. 2. If A drives fast in a narrow road and thereby kills a person on the road, though he might not have the intention but he is aware of the likelihood of the incident. As he has driven fast in spite of the knowledge of the incident, he has done the act voluntarily. 3. A causes a ship to be cast away, intending thereby to cause damage to Z who has lent money on buttoned on the ship, A has committed mischief. 4. A intending or knowing , to be likely permanently disfigure Z’s face gives him a blow, but it doesn’t disfigure his face but caused him severe injury for many days, A has caused voluntarily grievous hurt. 5. A with an intent to cause harm to Z takes his valuable document and it accidentally gets burnt, though he has no intention to burn it but as he has stolen the documents he is liable for the act voluntarily Case Law In the case of Keshab Mahindra vs. State of M.P on 13 september, 1996, the accused persons though knowing that the gas called MIC is likely to cause hurt, thus voluntarily (as defined under section 39 IPC) causes hurt to 8485 or more humans did not do anything to avoid the said escape of gas, so they are liable for the offence. (Bhopal gas Tragedy). 2. Ram Pal Singh and Ors. Vs State on 9 November, 1992 On the facts of the present case it can be safely inferred that at the time of throwing the child Ram Pal knew that he is likely to cause (that is voluntarily,Sec 39) grievous hurt to the child. Km. Sarita sustained a fracture which is a grievous hurt as defined in Section 320; IPC. The offence committed by the appellant would, therefore, be one under Section 325, IPC. A sentence of 3 years R.1 would meet the ends of justice. Conclusion
Voluntarily is not any offence or
punishment but it is an explanation that is used in various sections of Indian Panel Code and as such this section is used in cases along with other sections. FIN