Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HRM Replacement Assignment in Lieu of Test Component: Topic-Job Evaluation
HRM Replacement Assignment in Lieu of Test Component: Topic-Job Evaluation
B. Classification method: The job classification method slots jobs into reestablished
grades. Higher-rated grades demand more responsibilities, tougher working
conditions and varied job duties. This method is easy to understand and takes care of
all relevant factors affecting the performance of a job. However, it is not easy to
write all inclusive descriptions of a grade. Further, the method oversimplifies sharp
differences between different jobs and different grades.
C. Factor comparison method: In this method, jobs are ranked according to a series
of factors such as mental effort, physical effort, skill needed, responsibility,
supervisory responsibility, working conditions, etc. pay will be assigned in this
method by comparing the weights of the factors required for each job.
An example of factor comparison method
E le c tr ic ia n 60 11 (3 ) 1 4 (1 ) 1 5 (1 ) 1 2 (1 ) 8 (2 )
F itt e r 50 1 4 (1 ) 1 0 (2 ) 9 (2 ) 8 (2 ) 9 (1 )
W e ld e r 40 1 2 (2 ) 7 (3 ) 8 (3 ) 7 (3 ) 6 (3 )
C le a n e r 30 9 (4 ) 6 (4 ) 4 (5 ) 6 (4 ) 5 (4 )
L a b o u re r 25 8 (5 ) 4 (5 ) 6 (4 ) 3 (5 ) 4 (5 )
P o in t v a lu e s f o r D e g r e e s T o ta l
F a c to r 1 2 3 4 5
S k ill 10 20 30 40 50 150
P h y s ic a l e f f o r t 8 16 24 32 40 120
M e n ta l e ff o r t 5 10 15 20 25 75
R e s p o n s ib ilit y 7 14 21 28 35 105
W o r k i n g c o n d it io n s 6 12 18 24 30 90
M a x im u m t o t a l p o in t s o f a ll f a c t o r s d e p e n d in g o n t h e i r im p o r ta n c e t o jo b = 540
( B a n k O f f ic e r )
Conversion of job grade points into money value
P o in t r a n g e D a i l y W a g e ra te (R s ) J o b g ra d e s o f k e y b a n k o ffic i a ls
5 0 0 -6 0 0 3 0 0 -4 0 0 1 O ffic e r
6 0 0 -7 0 0 4 0 0 -5 0 0 2 A c c o u n ta n t
7 0 0 -8 0 0 5 0 0 -6 0 0 3 M a n a g e r I S c a le
8 0 0 -9 0 0 6 0 0 -7 0 0 4 M a n a g e r II S c a le
9 0 0 -1 0 0 0 7 0 0 -8 0 0 5 M a n a g e r III S c a l e
A Comparative Picture of Major Job Evaluation
Methods
M e th o d W h a t fa c e t o f H o w i s jo b Typ e of M a jo r M a jo r
jo b is e v a l u a t e d ? e v a lu a t e d ? m e th o d a d v a n ta g e s (s ) d is a d v a n t a g e ( s )
R a n k in g W h o l e jo b J o b s a r e s u b je c t i v e ly N o n - q u a n t it a t iv e R e l a t i v e ly q u i c k E n tir e ly s u b je c tiv e
( c o m p e n s a b le o r d e r e d a c c o r d in g a n d in e x p e n s iv e
fa c to r s a r e t o r e la t i v e w o r t h
im p lic it)
F a c to r C o m p e n s a b le C o m p a r e jo b to k e y Q u a n t i t a t iv e E a s y to u s e H a r d to c o n s tr u c t;
c o m p a r is o n fa c to r s o f jo b jo b s o n s c a l e s o f in a c c u r a te o v e r tim e
c o m p e n s a b le f a c t o r s
P o in t m e t h o d C o m p e n s a b le C o m p a r e jo b t o Q u a n t i t a t iv e A c c u ra te a n d M a y b e c o s t ly
fa c to r s o f jo b s ta n d a r d is e d s t a b le o v e r t i m e
d e s c r ip t io n s o f
d e g r e e s o f u n iv e rs a l
c o m p e n s a b le f a c t o r s
a n d s u b fa c to r s
THANK YOU.