Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN A MEMBRANE

BIOREACTOR AND A CONVENTIONAL SYSTEM


FOR TREATING WASTEWATER SIEMENS
ABSTRACT

For this reason this paper attempts to make a comparison PROBLEM


between the current conventional treatments of wastewater
treatment and technology of membrane bioreactors (MBR), There is no single universal form of
identifying the advantages and disadvantages of each treatment, selection between a membrane
in order to establish the optimal treatment that satisfies both bioreactor and a conventional system.
business needs and quality standards of treated water Nor is there a type of membrane
which is clearly superior to another.
KEY WORDS: Bioreactor, membrane, water quality, wastewater On the market a multitude of options
treatment whose choice will depend on user
requirements according to technical
and economic criteria.

BENEFITED POPULATION

THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Commercial sector directly related
-Submerged membranes LEGAL FRAMEWORK
to water treatment and people
served with optimal treatment.
Indirectly ecosystem in particular -External Membranes - National Constitution
water system.  
-Biorreactor -Decree 2811/1974

- System in conventional -Decree 631/2015


wastewater treatment

METHODOLOGY

INFO FUNCTIONAL
COLLECTION ANALYSIS

ANALYSIS OF
TESTS
TESTS

COMPARATIVE
REPORT
Bibliography: Nazim Çiçek, J. P. (Jan. - Feb. de 1999). Characterization and Comparison of a Membrane Bioreactor and a Conventional Activated-Sludge System in the Treatment of Wastewater Containing
High-Molecular-Weight Compounds. Water Environment Research, Vol. 71(No. 1), pp. 64-70.; Arévalo J., Garralón G., Plaza F., Moreno B., Pérez J., Gómez M.A (2009). Wastewater reuse after treatment
by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study. Desalination 243, 32–41; Mª Teresa Diez González, C. d. (2014). UTILIZACIÓN DE MEMBRANAS COMO TRATAMIENTOS
TERCIARIOS PARA REGENERACIÓN DE AGUAS RESIDUALES. Revista Tecnologí@ y desarrollo , 25.

Daniela Romero Sabogal 41122191 Universidad de la Salle


Laura Lemus Alfonso 41122028 Ingeniería Ambiental y Sanitaria

You might also like