BP America- Driving Safety

Mike W. Thompson, CSP

Where BP Operates

oil
gas
chemicals
refining
market
positions
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
Driving Fatality Statistics

• Driving and vehicle related fatalities are the number one

cause of fatalities in BP Group (82% in 2003).
• In E&P, 31 fatalities (9 within the OUSBU) over the past
two years, including 3 children.
• In 2004, we have had 2 contractors and 2 members of the
public die in driving and vehicle-related incidents – 3 in
the US, 1 in Algeria.
Driving Safety- Why the Urgency?
• We drive 56,863,834 miles per year (116 round trips to the moon!)
• 73 Vehicle Incidents in 2003
• 3 of 22 HIPOS in 2003 were vehicle related
• 5 of 63 SORs in 2003 were vehicle related
• Our driving performance places us in the bottom one-third of E&P business
units.
 Severe Vehicle Incidents – 2004 thru YTD May 2005

30 Severe Vehicle Incidents 04’-05’ (20/30 in Operations; 28/30 Contractors)

Operations / Wells NA Gas SPU STVAR/SVAR 04-YTD May 05

25 2.50

• 67% of severe vehicle incidents occurred in Operations

2004 TVAR = 1.21
• 13% of 2004 HiPo’s are driving related (4 Incidents) 2.09
2005 TVAR = 0.98
20 2.00
• One 3rd Party Vehicle Fatality in OUSBU / Two in Shelf
1.75

Assets 15
1.49
1.44
1.50
1.34
1.25 1.25
• Two TUs (Arkoma and Canada) had 39% of the severe vehicle 1.22 1.22 1.20 1.23 1.26 1.22 1.21 1.19

incidents. 1.13
10 0.981.00
• Hugoton had 3 HIPOs involving vehicle incidents
• Two assets did not have any severe vehicle incidents:
Permian and South Louisiana 5
0.33
0.50
0.32
0.26

Companies Involved
0.22 0.20 0.20 0.18 0.21 0.19 0.20 0.20 0.20
0.00 0.10 0.10
0.07 0.10
0 0.00

• 21 companies (incl. BP) reported severe vehicle incidents Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May

Total SVAR Total Veh Veh TVAR Veh SVAR

• 76% of companies reported single incidents
• Companies reporting ≥2 incidents Interventions
• A & A Tank and Truck Co. (Arkoma)
• Developing contract language for high risk & 100%
• Bob Dale (FTE) (Canada) use contractors
• Flare Construction (Overthrust/Moxa) • 3rd Party Fatality Reviews - SET
• Hodges Trucking Company (Arkoma) • Implemented Driving Standard
• Triple S Trucking (San Juan North and South) • Targeted Transportation Sector Commitment Sessions
• U.S. Logistics - CVP
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
The Golden Rule for Driving Safety

• All categories of vehicle, including self-propelled mobile plant,

must not be operated unless:

 vehicle is fit for purpose, inspected and confirmed to be in safe working order
 passenger number does not exceed manufacturer’s design specification for the vehicle
 loads are secure and do not exceed manufacturer’s design specifications or legal limits for the vehicle
 seat belts are installed and worn by all occupants
 safety helmets are worn by riders and passengers of motorcycles, bicycles, quads, snow-mobiles and
similar types of vehicle

Drivers must not be authorised to operate the vehicle unless:

 they are trained, certified and medically fit to operate the class of vehicle
 they are not under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and are not suffering from fatigue
 they do not use hand-held cell phones and radios while driving (best practice is to switch off all phones
and two-way radios when driving)

OUSBU HSE Training

The Group Functional Standard – Driving
Objectives
The new Standard will:

s been d Be the first of the BP Group

d ar d ha
D r i vi n g Stan e n um ber an Functional HSSE Standards
The r th
educe related
n e d to
desig y o f driving and improve
c
frequen s and fatalities ducing both Help save lives, by
accident rformance by reployees are improving in areas that have
safety peto which BP em l for harm to contributed to driving related
the risk and the potentia
exposed s of the public. holder value fatalities in BP in the past
member so protect share ential cost of
It will al ing the consequ . Focus on improving:
by reducrelated accidents
driving Skill and competency of the
driver

Safety of the journey

Safety of vehicle
The BP Driving Standard- A Standard
with 10 Elements
BP Driving Standard
Vehicle Requirements

1. The vehicle is fit for purpose, well maintained with seatbelts

2. The number of passengers not exceed spec for the vehicle
3. Loads are secure

Driver Requirements
4. They are licensed, trained, and medically fit
5. They are appropriately rested and alert
6. They do not use a mobile phone while operating the vehicle
7. In high risk countries journey management plans in place

8. Seatbelts worn by all occupants

9. Not under the influence of alcohol or drugs
10. Safety helmets worn by rider and passengers of motorcycles
etc
Implementation Planning - Overall
Timeline
Function Accounta bilitie s
• Agre e scope
• De fine sta nda rds
• Cre a te bus ine ss ca s e
• De fine me a sure s
• Re vie w by Le ga l a nd HR
• Obta in GCEM a pprova l
• Edit a nd publis h fina l S ta nda rd
• Communica te to Group Le a de rs hip
• De ve lop ba se line a nd ga p a na lys is
tool, includ ing pla n a nd cos ts
• De ve lop monitoring a nd online
tra ining tool
• De ve lop me cha nis m for ‘e xceptions’
• Contra ct te mp late (le ga l)
• Re giona l Imple me nta tion Works hops
• Re vie w impleme nta tion pla ns
• De velop good pra ctice too lbox
• Ide ntify ve hic le a nd tra ining s upplie rs
• De velop communications pa cks
• De velop DCT s upport tools
• Fa cilita te le s sons le a rne d forum
• Cre a te le a de rs hip workshops a nd
toolbox
• Monitor imp le me nta tion qua rte rly

Stage 1 S tage 2 Stage 3

P repa ra tion a nd approva l Base line a nd gap a na lys is Imple me nta tion a nd monitoring
May 200 3 July 20 03 S e pt 20 03 Jan 20 04 30 s t April 20 04 1 s t Jan 2 00 5 3 1 s t Dec 20 07

S tandard S ummit FCG S tandard Bas e line and g ap an alys is completed. S tandard into force for All contractors in
firs t Meeting Endors em ent
Approve d Imple mentatio n plans s ubmitted all BP employees and compliance
conceived
vehicles

• Ass is t de ve lopme nt of • Us e tool to ide ntify ca pa bilitie s a nd • Imple me nt s tanda rd

S ta nda rd via RS LT
• Ne twork impa ct wide ly
• S upport imple me nta tion pilot
• Communica te pe nding
a pprova l of Driving S ta nda rd
Se gme nt Accounta bilitie s
re s ource s
• Ba se line le vel of co mplia nce a nd
conduct ga p a na lys is
• P rioritis e ga ps a nd e s tima te cos ts
• S ubmit pla n of imp le me nta tion
• Run drive r e nga ge me nt works hops
• Re port imple me nta tion progre ss
• Re fle ct inte nt of S ta nda rd in tra nsport
contra cts
• S ha re good pra ctice s
• Le a de rship e nga ge me nt a nd s upport
(ride -alongs e tc)
• S elf-ve rifica tion a nd monito ring
Engaging our Contractors

mend
d R e g io n s shall recom
ons a n by all
in e s s S e g m ents, Functi s p e c t o f B P business
‘Bus rd in re members of
the
a d o p ti o n o f the Standa lo ye e s a re
the emp f BP
B P C o m p anies whose e S ta n d a r d in respect o
non - ing th re
o r k f or ce . Recommend ies whose employees a
w pa n ion
u s in e s s to non-BP Com m a n d a to r y. The decis
b ce is or
e m b e rs o f the workfor rd a condition of a new
m da
ake this Stan l be made in
whether to m t of a BP Company wil ons, includin
g BP
g co n tr a c B P F u n c ti
existin h the approp
riate
u lt a tio n w it
cons
Legal. should
a n o n - B P Company, it
d a r d is a ccepted by e n t w h ic h states that
If the Sta n reem
r a te d in to a written ag it o ring and aud
iting
b e in c o r p o enti n g , m o n
y for implem ill rest with the non-BP
responsibilit S tandard w th at the non-B
P
n c e to th e a n y , a n d
adhere ith the BP C
omp
ompany ag
ainst
a n y , n o t w v a n t B P C
Comp e rele
y s h a ll indemnify th e.
Com p a n
e n c e s of no n-complianc
the consequ
e 3 D riv in g Standard
Pa g
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
E&P Driving Safety Immersion
Intent and Objectives
Tony Hayward, GVP expectations of leadership
– Make the program work
– Make the program relevant to the local circumstance
– Ensure everyone is included
– Build personal competency and capability
Driving Safety Immersion Intent : Improve the competency and capability of
workforce to operate vehicles safely
Learning Phase – April - July 2004
• Create awareness and knowledge of driving risks and vehicle incident causes
• Share learnings from incidents
Practice Phase – August - November 2004
• Improve knowledge of safe driving by application of Onshore US BU Driving Practice
• Verify safe driving expectations are clear with workforce (bp and contractor) and
resources available
Testing Phase – December 2004- February 2005
• Provide assurance of competency in safe driving practices and Group Driving Standard
through testing and audit
Driving Safety Immersion
What’s Expected
Driving Safety Tier 1 & 2 Leadership Field Operations/ Wells Driving Safety Team
Leadership
IMMERSION

Phase 1 •Attend Leadership Team Roll Out
Introduce CD or Video
(Learning) •Cascade to Teams
Employees
April/July
•Roll out session of Field (PUL,
AM, Wells Supv,OCM)
•BU LT to review feedback on
Rollout
•Organize Roll Out Session for •Roll out to Leadership
Field . (Use CDs or videos and local Team
All
examples PUL, AM, OCM, HSE) •Ongoing activities to
•Ensure Expectations around include Immersion,
driving are clear through use of VDRs, and Group
Golden Rule Standard
•Ensure that learning message •Establish workforce
makes it’s way to all workforce training plans for
•Conduct Roll Out Sessions for key approved driving
contractors courses (HSE +/- Driving
Safety Team)
•Feedback VDR roll out plans to
•Monitor completion of
Driving Safety Team
rollout plans (who,
target date, completed
date)
•Analyze employee
feedback
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
Driving Safety Team

Members:
• BU Champion: Bryant ChapmanTeam Lead: Bruce Policky

• Representatives:
OC’s: Dave Rothbauer, Gary Munson, Dave McKenna, Kurtis Peden
HSE: Duane Kortsha, Jerry Piper, Cheryl Metzler
Training & Development: Mike Thompson
Drilling/Wells: David Sims
Supply Chain Management: Fred Fitzhugh
Legal: Ken George
Gap Analysis Tool
• Intent
– To assess each element of the Driving Standard and provides a
comprehensive process for conducting a baseline gap analysis and
tracking the progress of implementation going forward
• Scope
– The Tool captures the detailed gaps, actions and resources which will
inform the Implementation Plans - it is not, in itself, an
Implementation Plan
• Format
– Four Excel spreadsheets
– One PowerPoint user training pack
 Gap Analysis Tool - Summary
Dashboard

• The summary spreadsheets present the data in a user-friendly

dashboard
BP Implementation Gap April May June July Aug Sept. Oct Nov Dec
Analysis-Action Plan
Element

1. Vehicle fit for Retrofit/replace vehicles for ABS&Airbags

purpose Assure manuf. specified vehicle maint schedules met and documented

2. No. of Passengers COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

3. Loads Secure Assure loads, equipment and vehicle components are addressed

4. Driver Training ID BP Drivers

and document
Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers (Ongoing 3 yr. Freq.)
Continue trng. for non-Prof. Drivers
Conduct and continue medical assessments
5. Fatigue/Tiredness Develop trng. mat’ls

Training ID Instructors
Conduct trng. for Prof. Drivers

6. Mobile Telephones
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

7.Journey Mgm’t N/A- OUSBU not operating in a “High-Risk” Classified Country;

OUSBU Driving Safety “Practice” encourages Journey Management.

8. Seatbelts
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

9. Alcohol/Drugs
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up

10. Helmets
COMPLETE; Assure thru administrative follow-up 6 April 2004
Driving Safety Practice Aligned with
Group Standard
Onshore US Driving Safety Practice- Attachments
Centralized Website for Driving Safety
Information
 What Is A VDR?

• A mechanical/electronic system which records and transmits to a portal key

driving performance information

• A black box of sorts for vehicles to record (with set thresholds):

 Location (via GPS)

 Speed/RPMs
 Harsh or rapid bumps, turns, acceleration and brakes
 Impact/crash data
 Seatbelt use
 Trip duration/mileage
 Three Options for Training
• Option One - Basic Defensive Driving Training - Professional Drivers

• Option 2 - Basic Defensive Driving Training - Non-Professional

Drivers
• Option 3 - Advanced Defensive Driving Training
Fatigue Training for Drivers
Fatigue is the body’s response to continued
Physical or Mental Activity or Sleep Loss
Fatigue results from:
• Working for extended periods of time
• Not getting enough sleep
• Prolonged physical activity
• Irregular work schedules
• Poor physical and environmental
conditions
“Driving Safety Day” Survey Results
Driving Safety Immersion
Conducting an ASA

• Management can demonstrate their commitment to this

Immersion and to promoting Driving Safety through the
ASA process.
• An example of a Driving Safety ASA courtesy of San
Juan North OC is available.
(click on icon for sample ASA) Microsoft Word
Document
Objectives for Today’s Session

• Background/Context
• Brief Overview of BP Group Functional Standard for
Personal Safety-Driving
• Discuss BP E&P Segment Immersions Process
• BP Onshore US BU Activities and Tools
• Sustaining the Progress
• Q&A
2005 Sustaining New Driving Safety
Standard
Purpose and Objectives

 Recognise and reward

driving safety skills and
behaviours

 Motivate BP workforce
drivers to achieve the highest
levels of driving safety
performance

 Build awareness and

understanding of safe driving
techniques and behaviours
Regional and Final Events

Western Hem HV
12-13 Nov 2004 Europe
2-5 June 2005

Western Hem LV Asia Pacific

16–17 June 2005 7-9 July 2005

Africa, Middle East,

Russia and Caspian
1-3 Sep 2005

IDC Final
Cape Town
4-6 Nov 2005
Thank you for being a safe driver
Questions ?????

Arrive safely. Drive Safely.