Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainable Development Framework The Natural Step
Sustainable Development Framework The Natural Step
Local G lo b a l
F e w L a rg e S o u rce s D if f u s e
S h o r t T im e D e la y L o n g T im e D e la y
L o w C o m p le x it y H ig h C o m p le x it y
Sustainability in media
2006-2008
Before 2006
Warnings
2006
Inconvenient Truth – threat and darkness
2007
It is here to stay and it is cool
7
2007 – 6.56 Billion
6
5
Billions
3
1945 – 2.3 Billion
2
1 1776 – 1 Billion
First 250
250 Million
Million
First Modern
Modern Humans
Humans 1492 – 500 Million
0
160,000 100,000 10,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 1 1,000 2,000 2,150
B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. B.C. A.D. A.D. A.D. A.D.
Wellbeing
•2% of population Controls > ½ the World’s Wealth
•50% of population controls < 1% of World’s Wealth
Portugal
UK
•Income gaps between rich and poor > 2X in last 50 years
Wellbeing
Greece
Ireland New Zealand
Austria France Australia
Japan
Wilkinson & Pickett,
The Spirit Level
v (2009)
v
Better
Low Wealth Gap High
http://www.inhabitat.com/2010/10/14/worlds-largest-and-most-expensive-family-home-completed/
Earth Overshoot!
Human Development Index &
Ecological Footpring of Nations (2005)
USA, Kuwait,
United Arab
Emirates
Sweden
Mauritius
Source: www.footprintnetwork.org
OVERSHOOT
Financ ials
NGOs Economists
Employees
Media Global Markets
The Public
No n-Financ ials / Re putatio n Investors
Customers Banks Insurers
Increasing
demand for resources and
ecosystem services (land &
water used by organizations)
The Concept of the Funnel
Natural Capacity:
Decline in Living Systems
Demand:
Population x Affluence x Technology
G lo b a l P e r s p e c tiv e
D e c lin e in L if e S u p p o r t in g R e s o u r c e s
M a r g in f o r A c t io n ?
P o p u la t io n x A f f lu e n c e x T e c h n o lo g y
Hitting the Wall
• Ecology - species, atmosphere, oceans, land, water
• Health of workers, society, self
• Competition, prices, shortages, insurance
• Social stigmas, recruiting problems
Capacity • Government regulations, standards
Demand
Investing for the Future
Capacity
• Societal Demands
• Market Demands
Defensive • Nature’s Requirements
Enterprise
Restoration
Long Term
Profitability
Strategic
Enterprise
A defensive enterprise is forced to implement
changes at a later stage at higher cost.
Demand
Sustainable Future
Capacity and quality of:
• Water, oceans and fisheries
• Arable Land
• Climatic stability
• Capacity of environment to absorb waste
• Forest Cover & capacity to fix CO2
• Food
Sustainability
Today
Our Vision...
Our Mission...
Swedish Eco-
municipalities
City of Madision, WI
TNS
Could you be strategic?
Vision
2014 Tim
e
Challenge of Alignment
is a shared language
and acts as a compass
The Natural Step concepts
1.The sustainability challenge
2. Backcasting
Details/Complexity
= leaves
Fundamental
Principles
= trunk and branches
There is no away.
Matter can change form, but it doesn’t leave
2. The earth is an open system with respect to
energy. In fact, energy from the sun is the only input
into the system. This energy enters our atmosphere
and is released back into space in the form of heat.
Open system
for energy
Closed system
for matter
1) Nothing
disappears
«Photosytesis
2) Everything
provides new
disperse
structure »
Nothing disappears
Everything disperses
We consume quality
People
Diversity
Interdependence
Manfred Max-Neef et al
5-level model
What does the system look like in which I
live? How is it constituted?
1 . S y s te m s L e v e l C h e s s b o a r d , r u le s o f th e g a m e
2. Success Level C a p tu r in g K in g - C h e c k m a te
3 . S tra te g y L e v e l S tr a te g ie s fo r o p e n in g , m id d le a n d e n d g a m e
4 . A c tio n L e v e l T a c t ic s f o r m o v in g p ie c e s
5 . T o o ls L e v e l B o o k s , c la s s e s , c o m p u te r p r o g r a m s
5-level model
Planet earth and cycles that maintain it
I n a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y , n a t u r e is n o t s u b je c t t o
s y s t e m a t ic a lly in c r e a s in g
… c o n c e n tr a tio n s o f s u b s ta n c e s e x tr a c te d fr o m th e
e a r th ’s c r u s t .
H o w m a n y p o u n d s o f m a te r ia l d o e s it ta k e to m a k e
o n e la p to p c o m p u te r ?
4 0 ,0 0 0 p o u n d s o r 2 0 t o n s
- P aul H aw ken
Sustainability principle 1
1b) Does your organization rely on fossil fuel-based energy for operations (e.g. coal-
fired electricity, gas-fired electricity, gas for heating, etc.)?
1c) Does your organization rely on fossil fuel-based transportation to move people
and things (e.g. vehicle fleets, flights for visitors, commuting of employees,
collection of garbage, transport of products and supplies,
etc.)?
1d) Does your organization have any practices or programs in place internally that
reduce energy use and/or flows of trace metals or minerals?
1e) Does your organization offer any products or services that reduce energy use
and/or flows of trace metals or minerals for others?
Sustainability principle 2
Metals that are plentiful in nature (aluminium, iron etc…) Metals that are scarce in nature (mercury, cadmium, lead, nickel etc…)
Re-usable, recyclable and recycled-content materials Materials that are disposable, non-recyclable or made from virgin resources
SustainabilityPrinciple #2
In a s u s ta in a b le s o c ie t y, o u r o rg a n iz a tio n w ill r e d u c e a n d e lim in a te o u r
c o n trib u tio n to th e s ys te m a tic a c c u m u la tio n o f s u b s t a n c e s p ro d u c e d b y s o c ie t y.
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Natural, biodegradable materials (glass wood, cotton, water-based etc.) Petroleum-based and synthetic (esp. toxic and hazardous) materials
Materials that are managed in tight technical cycles Materials that are likely to be dispersed into nature
Organically grown, untreated Chemically grown, treated
Re-usable, recyclable and recycled content materials Materials that are disposable, non-recyclable or made from virgin resources
SustainabilityPrinciple #3
In a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y, o u r o rg a n iz a tio n w ill r e d u c e a n d e lim in a te o u r
c o n trib u tio n to th e o n g o in g p h ys ic a l d e g ra d a tio n o f n a tu r e .
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Materials from well-managed ecosytems Over-harvested resources
Fast-growing crops (hemp, bamboo etc.) Slow-growing, resource-intensive methods
Use of previously developed lands Use of undeveloped green space
Materials that are disposable, non-recyclable or made from virgin resources
2a) Does your organization use or produce synthetic substances that contain persistent
compounds (e.g. PVC in piping, volatile organic compounds in cleaners, paints and
adhesives, CFCs in refrigerants, brominated fire retardants in electronics and furniture,
etc.)?
2b) Does your organization rely on production processes that use synthetic substances
that contain persistent compounds (e.g. dioxins or furans in the pulp and paper
process)?
2c) Does your organization have any practices or programs in place internally that reduce
flows of persistent compounds?
2d) Does your organization offer any products or services that reduce flows of persistent
compounds for others?
S y s te m C o n d it io n # 3
I n a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y , n a t u r e is n o t s u b j e c t t o
s y s t e m a t ic a lly in c r e a s in g
… d e g r a d a tio n b y p h y s ic a l m e a n s
SustainabilityPrinciple #2
In a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y, o u r o rg a n iz a tio n w ill r e d u c e a n d e lim in a te o u r
c o n trib u tio n to th e s ys te m a tic a c c u m u la tio n o f s u b s t a n c e s p ro d u c e d b y s o c ie t y.
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Natural, biodegradable materials (glass wood, cotton, water-based etc.) Petroleum-based and synthetic (esp. toxic and hazardous) materials
Materials that are managed in tight technical cycles Materials that are likely to be dispersed into nature
Organically grown, untreated Chemically grown, treated
Re-usable, recyclable and recycled content materials Materials that are disposable, non-recyclable or made from virgin resources
SustainabilityPrinciple #3
In a s u s ta in a b le s o c ie t y, o u r o rg a n iz a tio n w ill r e d u c e a n d e lim in a te o u r
c o n trib u tio n to th e o n g o in g p h ys ic a l d e g ra d a tio n o f n a tu r e .
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Materials from well-managed ecosytems Over-harvested resources
Fast-growing crops (hemp, bamboo etc.) Slow-growing, resource-intensive methods
Use of previously developed lands Use of undeveloped green space
Re-usable, recyclable and recycled content materials Materials that are disposable, non-recyclable or made from virgin resources
SustainabilityPrinciple #4
In a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y, o u r o rg a n iz a tio n w ill r e d u c e a n d e lim in a te o u r
c o n trib u tio n to c o n d itio n s th a t s ys te m a tic a lly u n d e rm in e p e o p le ’s a b ilit y to m e e t
th e ir n e e d s .
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Safe working and living conditions Unsafe living and working conditions
Inclusive and transparent decision making Exclusive and closed decision making
Unaffordable products and services; economic barriers
3a) Does your organization use or produce food and fibre from unsustainably
harvested renewable resources (e.g. lumber from non-certified forests, food from
farming practices that result in loss of biodiversity and topsoil)?
3b) Does your organization rely on processes that require continuous direct
encroachment into natural areas (e.g.urban design practices that result in urban
sprawl)?
3c) Does your organization rely on processes that introduce foreign and invasive spe
cies into an ecosystem?
3d) Does your organization rely on processes that modify ecosystems in such a way as
to reduce their biodiversity and productivity? (e.g. clearing land for monocultures)
S y s te m C o n d it io n # 4
I n a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y
p e o p le a r e n o t s u b je c t t o c o n d it io n s t h a t s y s t e m a t ic a lly
u n d e r m in e th e ir c a p a c ity to m e e t th e ir n e e d s .
What can we do?
Win/Win Situations
Economic barriers
Enterprise
Development
Political Oppression Political Freedom
SustainabilityPrinciple #4
In a s u s t a in a b le s o c ie t y, o u r o rg a n iz a tio n w ill r e d u c e a n d e lim in a te o u r
c o n trib u tio n to c o n d itio n s th a t s ys te m a tic a lly u n d e rm in e p e o p le ’s a b ilit y to m e e t
th e ir n e e d s .
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Safe working and living conditions Unsafe living and working conditions
Inclusive and transparent decision making Exclusive and closed decision making
Unaffordable products and services; economic barriers
Political freedom Political oppression
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Actions that tie you in to using current technologies
Technical solutions that are adaptable, modular, scalable Partial solutions that cannot be further developed (i.e. dead-ends)
Actions that build broader support for sustainability initiatives Capital investments that lock you in to a single way of doing things
FAVOURING AVOIDING
Quick early wins Actions that tie up too much capital in partial solutions, making future
4a) Does your organization rely on inputs that come from regions or companies where authorities
create obstacles for people to meet their needs? Does your organization have any practices
itself that do so?
4b) Does your organization rely on processes that create economic conditions that hinder people
from meeting their needs?
4c) Does your organization rely on processes that contribute to unsafe and unhealthy work
environments and/or that contribute to unsafe and unhealthy living environments for people in
local communities?
4d) Does your organization have any programs in place internally that reduce or eliminate barriers
to people meeting their needs?
4e) Does your organization offer any products or services that reduce or eliminate barriers to
people meeting their needs?
How do we destroy the system?
Degrade by
physical means
Barriers to
people
meeting their
basic needs
Increase
concentrations
Increase
concentrations
PLANNNING FOR SUSTAINABILITY
• AWARENESS
• BASELINE ANALYSIS
• COMPELLING VISION
• DOWN TO ACTION
S u s ta in a b ility P la n n in g P r o c e s s
A - A w a re n e ss
W h a t d o y o u k n o w a b o u t s u s t a in a b ilit y a n d w h y it
m a tte rs ?
B - B a s e lin e M a p p in g
W h a t d o e s y o u r o r g a n iz a t io n lo o k lik e t o d a y ?
C - C le a r a n d C o m p e llin g V is io n
W h a t d o e s y o u r o r g a n iz a t io n lo o k lik e in a s u s t a in a b le
s o c ie t y ?
D - D o w n t o a c t io n
H o w w ill y o u m a n a g e a n d p r io r it iz e s t e p s t o s u s t a in a b ilit y ?
S e ction De s cription S ugge s te d tas ks
Assess how prepared your organization 1. Form a team.
Getting Ready is to engage in a sustainability driven 2. Assess governance and decision-making practices.
change initiative.
Analyze at a high-level the social 5. Create an inventory of assets that you can build from in
and environmental impacts of your your sustainability initiative.
Step B – organization. 6. Conduct a sustainability impacts analysis for your
Baseline Analysis organization.
7. Evaluate stakeholder relationships with respect to how
they can help and hinder your organization’s
sustainability initiative.
Step C – Create long-term strategic goals to guide 8. Synthesize your learning from the Step B into ‘strategic
your organization toward sustainability. goals’.
Compelling Vision
1. Right direction?
2. Flexible platform?
3. Good return on investment?
Strategic prioritization
Handling of trade-offs
Cross-sectoral collaboration
The ABCD-process
Awareness
& Vision
Vision
Actions &
solutions
Future
Baseline
analysis
Prioritisation
ABCD methodology
Sustainability integrated into goals for
companies/value-chains/regions/cities
Backcasting Vision
Core Values
D. Prioritize from C
- Flexible platform? Strategic goals
- Enough ROI?
Aktionsprogram C.
B. List
List possible solutions
current
situation
Backcasting from Principles
Backcasting
Future
• W o r ld ’s la r g e s t c o m m e r c ia l f lo o r c o v e r in g c o m p a n y
• F ir s t U . S . c o m p a n y t o a d o p t T N S p r in c ip le s
• “ M is s io n Z e r o ” - e lim in a t e n e g a t iv e im p a c t b y 2 0 2 0
• F in a n c e lo n g t e r m in v e s t m e n t s w it h s h o r t t e r m s a v in g s
C o llin s P in e
• N W f o r e s t p r o d u c t s f ir m f o u n d e d in 1 8 5 5
• L o n g h is t o r y o f s u s t a in a b le f o r e s t r y p r a c t ic e s
• T r a in e d 6 0 0 K la m a t h F a lls e m p lo y e e s
• U s in g T N S p r in c ip le s f o r a ll c a p it a l p u r c h a s e s
W h is t le r , B .C .
• I n t e r n a t io n a l s k i r e s o r t
• E ffe c t iv e c o m m u n it y d iffu s io n
– E a r ly A d o p t e r s
– S u p p o r t e d b y b u s in e s s , g o v e r n m e n t a n d n o n p r o fit
– C o m m u n it y R o ll O u t
• W h is t le r 2 0 2 0 S u s t a in a b ilit y P la n
– G o a l t o b e fu lly s u s t a in a b le b y 2 0 6 0
– M o v e t o w a r d 1 0 0 % r e n e w a b le e n e r g y & z e r o w a s t e
– P r o v id e a ffo r d a b le lo c a l h o u s in g t o 7 5 % o f w o r k fo r c e
• W o n a w a r d a s “ … o n e o f t h e m o s t liv e a b le c o m m u n it ie s a n d b e s t
in t h e w o r ld in p la n n in g f o r t h e f u t u r e . ” ( N o v 2 0 0 5 )
Scandic Hotels
• Resource Hunt programme to find ways to cut back
on energy, water and waste-handling costs at its
120+ hotels in Northern Europe
• In first two years
– reduced energy consumption by 12%
– reduced water consumption by 12%
– reduced waste generation by 28%
of why it can be an effective tool for strategic planning.
p19
What the world needs now, more than ever before is
Leadership.
Role models.
Champions.
People who are willing to stand up and make a
difference.
p19
Causes instead of effects
Sustainability is more about competence than values
Blekinge Institute of Technology - Natural
The Karl-Henrik
Step Robèrt
But...
Incompetent leadership
Conclusion
•Greatest sustainability problem – incompetent leadership
Cu 25 380 9 000 55 24
Pb 19 290 3 300 85 12
So ”green economy” ought to mean a modified economic system, not running in
the face of leaders who know what social and ecological sustainability is.
”The role for entrepreneurs to help develop a green economy” before ”The role of
entrepreneurs in a green economy”.
W h a t is th e p u r p o s e o f b u s in e s s ?
• “ B u s in e s s t h a t f o c u s e s j u s t o n m o n e y d o e s n ’t in v e s t in
t h e f u t u r e - - in it s e m p lo y e e s , n e w id e a s , m a r k e t s o r
p r o d u c t s - - a n d w o n ’t b e a r o u n d f o r lo n g . A n y s u c c e s s f u l
b u s in e s s is p a r t o f s o c ie t y , a n d e x is t s t o m e e t s o c ie t y ’s
n e e d s .”
– S ir J o h n B r o w n e , G r o u p C h ie f E x e c u t iv e , B . P .
FINALWORDS
Thanks