Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Duracell'S Acquisition by Berkshire Hathaway: A Case Study
Duracell'S Acquisition by Berkshire Hathaway: A Case Study
Duracell'S Acquisition by Berkshire Hathaway: A Case Study
BY BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY
A CASE STUDY
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
CONTENTS
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
INTRODUCTION
• Portfolio restructuring refers to changes in ownership structure of the business lines of a firm
brought about by sale of businesses no longer needed or wanted and purchase of different
ones. It includes corporate divestitures (sale of stocks of businesses wholly or partly) and mergers
and acquisitions. When analyzing a divestiture strategy, the main decision that the management
has to make is the choice of the divestiture strategy.
1 To analyse the divestiture strategy employed by P&G to divest Duracell, that is, a split-off
and how it was used for Duracell's acquisition by Berkshire Hathaway
2 To probe the choice of this strategy vis-à-vis spin off and carve-out
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
WERE THE TWO SIDES CONTENT?
“I have always been impressed by Duracell, as a consumer and as a long-term investor in P&G
and Gillette,” commented Warren Buffett, Berkshire’s chief executive. “Duracell is a leading
global brand with top quality products, and it will fit well within Berkshire Hathaway .”
P&G President and Chief Executive Officer, David Taylor, commented: “Duracell is a strong, global
business with a great future ahead of it as part of the Berkshire Hathaway family. We thank
Duracell’s employees for their many contributions to P&G and wish them continued success for the
future.”
A split-off is a form of corporate reorganization in which a parent company divests a business unit or
subsidiary.
In a split-off, the parent company gives shareholders the option of either keeping their existing shares or
trading them for divesting company shares.
Post the split-off, the subsidiary becomes a separate legal entity owned by some of the parent
organization's shareholders.
In our case, P&G split-off Duracell to Berkshire which relinquished all its shares in P&G in exchange
for all of Duracell’s shares, thereby making the entire deal an “acquisition”.
$
Buffet’s known for investing in underperforming
businesses and turning them around. Duracell fit
well into Buffet’s portfolio. Duracell sales had
$
been declining for some time then but Buffet saw
predictability and competitive strength in it.
01 02 03
TAX BENEFIT
FAIR PRICE TAG
Had Berkshire sold its stake in P&G in the open market,
it would have had to pay taxes worth 1 billion dollars on At that time, Duracell was trading at an
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
WARREN BUFFET PHILOSOPHY
STRATEGIC CORPORATE 12
FINANCE
Benefits
BENEFITS FOR PROCTOR AND GAMBLE
$
would trim its portfolio down by selling half of its
global brands that were not deemed critical to the
company's future, like Duracell. Duracell’s sales
had been declining and its long-term growth
prospects were not too promising for P&G. The
deal helped P&G get rid off Duracell.
01 02 03
TAX BENEFIT
VALUE FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS
The split off fulfilled all the requirements under Section
The deal created value for the shareholders by
355 of the US Internal Revenue Code. Consequently, the
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
IMPACT: PROCTER & GAMBLE
2018 2017 2016 2015
NET SALES $66.8 $65.1 $65.3 $70.7
OPERATING Reduction in cost of goods sold,
$13.7 $14.0 $13.4 $11.0
INCOME marketing expenditure by $100 million
NET EARNINGS $9.8 $15.3 $10.5 $7.0 and improvement in profit per employee
(ATTRIBUTABLE TO
P&G) by 45%.
NET EARNINGS
(MARGIN FROM
$14.8 $15.7 $15.4 $11.7
CONTINUING 3% surge in sales of June 2018
OPERATIONS)
(earnings $9.750 billion).
DILUTED NET
EARNINGS PER
$3.67 $3.69 $3.49 $2.84
SHARE FROM Annual revenue of 2018 was $66.832
CONTUINING
OPERATIONS billion, an increase of 2.7%.
DILUTED NET $3.67 $5.59 $3.69 $2.44
EARNINGS PER Increase in share value thereby
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
IMPACT: DURACELL
Sales rose by 6%(i.e.$1billion)
from third quarter of 2016 , leaving Financial performance of Duracell from 2016-17(in 1000
behind its major rivals.
British pounds)
44219.6
Gross profit
Duracell’s Coppertop and 31721.9
Quantum batteries hit highest sales
6350.8
with combined market share of Profit for the year
1556.5
50%.
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
DIVESTITURE STRATEGIES
TYPES
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
SPIN-OFF CARVE-OUT
STRATEGIC CORPORATE
FINANCE
CONCLUSION – WHY A SPLIT-OFF OVER SPIN-OFF OR CARVE-OUT?
Under a spin-off, Berkshire wouldn’t have been able to get full ownership of Duracell as the new shares
1 of Duracell would have been distributed on a pro rata basis to all the shareholders, that is, Berkshire’s
1.9% stake in P&G would have translated into mere 1.9% stake in Duracell.
P&G wanted to reduce the number of its outstanding shares and increase EPS for its shareholders.
2 This could only be made possible by a split-off as shares outstanding remain the same in spin-off and
carve-out.
A carve-out got ruled out too because the law stipulates that the parent company can only divest 20%
3 of its voting interest in the subsidiary through the IPO while P&G’s intent was to divest 100%
interest in Duracell.
DURACELL
ACQUIRING GILLETE ACQUIRED
EVEREADY BY P AND G