Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Glenoid Fossa Remodelling
Glenoid Fossa Remodelling
Elias G. Katsavrias and John C. Voudouris; Presented by: Dr. Arnab Agasty
Angle Orthodontist, Vol 74, No 1, 2004
ANATOMY OF THE GLENOID FOSSA
The mandibular condyle articulates at the
base of the cranium with the concave
mandibular fossa - squamous portion of
temporal bone.
Posterior to this is the squamotympanic fissure,
extending mediolaterally. The post glenoid process
demarcates the border of the Glenoid fossa
Anteriorly bound by Articular Eminence.
Photomicrographs of decalcified midsagittal section of glenoid fossa, showing postglenoid spines; haematoxylin and eosin stained, original magnification
10.5X. A, Control animal #273, arrows show natural backward and downward growth direction. B, 12-week experimental animal #271, arrows show forward (reverse
of natural growth direction) and downward growth. C, 12-week experimental animal #270, arrows show forward and downward growth. D, 18-week experimental
animal #269, arrows show forward and downward growth. Note that resting line (arrows) is toward posterior of postglenoid spine in control (A), indicating normal bone
formation on posterior aspect of postglenoid spine as fossa grows downward and backward. In contrast, resting lines are visible toward anterior of postglenoid spine in
12-week experimental animals (B and C), indicating start of new bone formation in anterior direction. Anterior resting line also found in 18-week experimental animal
(D). Note woven bone (W) in 12-week experimental animals. Lamellar bone (L) observed with increased time in 18-week experimental
CONCLUSION
Restriction of the downward and backward growth of the fossa observed in the
control subjects was thought to additionally contribute to the overall super Class I
malocclusion. Clinically, these combined effects could be significant at the fossa. The
restriction of local temporal bone (fossa) growth cannot be observed clinically; thus,
these results might also clarify some Class II correction effects that cannot be
explained with functional appliances.
Results from permanently implanted electromyographic sensors demonstrated that
lateral pterygoid muscle hyperactivity was not associated with condyleglenoid fossa
growth modification with functional appliances, and that other factors, such as
reciprocal stretch forces and subsequent transduction along the fibrocartilage
between the displaced condyle and fossa, might play a more significant role in new
bone formation.
GROWTH
-VOUDOURIS, 2000
RELATIVITY CONCEPT
Growth relativity states that – “with orthopaedically displaced condyle , the bone
architecture is influenced by the neuromusculature & the contiguous, non –
muscular , viscoelastic tissues anchored to the glenoid fossa & the altered dynamics
of the fluids enveloping bone”.
Growth relativity hypothesis 3 main foundations:-
1. Displacement
2. Viscoelasticity
3. Referred force (transduction)
A HISTOCHEMICAL STUDY ON
CONDYLAR CARTILAGE AND GLENOID
FOSSA DURING MANDIBULAR
ADVANCEMENT
Payam Owtad; Zoe Potresa; Gang Shen; Peter Petocz; M. Ali Darendeliler
Angle Orthod. 2011;81:270–276.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate cellular hypertrophic activities in the mandibular condylar cartilage
(MCC) and the glenoid fossa (GF) during mandibular advancement in the
temporomandibular joint (TMJ) of Sprague-Dawley rats, as evidenced by fibroblast
growth factor 8 (FGF8).
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Fifty-five female 24-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into four
experimental and control groups, with a mandibular advancement appliance on the
experimental rats’ lower incisors. The rats were euthanized on days 3, 14, 21, and 30
of the study, and their TMJ was prepared for a immunohistochemical staining
procedure to detect FGF8.
RESULTS
FGF8 expression was significantly higher among the experimental rats (P 5 .002).
Patterns of ascension and descension of FGF8 expression were similar in
experimental and control samples. The results showed an overall enhanced
osteogenic transition occurring in both the MCC and the GF in experimental rats in
comparison with controls. The level of cellular changes in the MCC was remarkably
higher than in the GF.
In the MCC and the GF, cellular morphologic and hypertrophic differentiations
increase significantly during mandibular advancement.
Photomicrographs show immunostaining for FGF8 expressed in the glenoid fossa of another
experimental sample (27-day-old rat, wearing bite jumping appliance for 3 days)
experimental sample (38- day-old rat, wearing bite jumping appliance for 14 days)
CONCLUSION
It is also concluded that endochondral ossification in the MCC and
intramembranous ossification in the GF occur during adaptive remodeling.
VEGF AND BONE FORMATION IN THE
GLENOID FOSSA DURING FORWARD
MANDIBULAR POSITIONING