What’s your experience with banks? Checking Saving Fees Loans Credit Interest COULD YOU MANAGE WITHOUT IT? MONEY AS DEBT http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/135.ht ml A simple form of banking was practiced by the ancient temples of Egypt, Babylonia, and Greece, which loaned at high rates of interest the gold and silver deposited for safekeeping. Private banking existed by 600 AD and was considerably developed by the Greeks, Romans, and Byzantines. Medieval banking was dominated by the Jews and Levantines because of the strictures of the Christian Church against interest and because many other occupations were largely closed to Jews. Banking developed rapidly throughout the 18th and 19th cent., accompanying the expansion of industry and trade, with each nation evolving the distinctive forms peculiar to its economic and social life. • Goldsmiths had always been the storehouses for cash and valuables so they were in a unique position to evolve a system of banking. It was they who introduced paper money and checks. They also started to lend their customers' money for interest. The Bank of Venice (1171) and the Bank of England (1694), functioned in connection with loans to the government
The Bank of Amsterdam (1609), to receive
deposits of gold and silver. 17th Century During the 17th century trade in England developed at a rapid pace and new methods of finance were required. As the Usury Laws, which had forbidden the lending of money for interest, had been repealed in the previous century, banking was in a position to develop in England. The Rothschild banking family of Naples founded by Calmann (Carl) Mayer von Rothschild (1788-1855) who was sent to the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies his sons were sent to different European cities to establish a financial institution to invest in business and provide banking services. Essential Money supplies of the colonists 1. Traditional native currencies such as furs and wampum which were essential for frontier trading with the indigenous population but thereafter were widely adopted by the colonists themselves, e.g. in 1637 Massachusetts declared white wampum legal tender for sums up to one shilling, a limit raised substantially in 1643. 2. The so-called "Country Pay" or "Country Money" such as tobacco, rice, indigo, wheat, maize, etc. - "cash crops" in more than one sense. Tobacco was used as money in and around Virginia for nearly 200 years, so lasting about twice as long as the US gold standard. 3. Unofficial coinages, mostly foreign, and especially Spanish and Portuguese coins. --John Hall set up a private mint in Massachusetts in 1652 and his popular "pine- tree" shillings and other coins circulated widely until the mint was forced to close down in 1684. 4. The scarce but official British coinage. 5. Paper currency of various kinds, particularly in the colonies' later years. A Brief History of U.S. Banking The First Banks: 1791 to 1832 In most states of the early federal union, bank organizers needed special permission from the state government to open and operate. For a while, an additional layer of oversight was provided by the Bank of the United States, a central bank founded in 1791 at the initiative of the nation's first Secretary of the Treasury, Alexander Hamilton. The Bank was bitterly opposed by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, who saw it as an engine for speculation, financial manipulation, and corruption. Congress refused to extend its charter in 1811, and as a result Madison's government had great difficulty financing the War of 1812. A second Bank of the United States was created in 1816 and operated until 1832. It was basically a copy of the First Bank, with branches over the country. Andrew Jackson, who became president in 1828, denounced it as an engine of corruption that benefited his enemies. His destruction of the bank was a major political issue in the 1830s and shaped the Second Party System, as Democrats in the states opposed banks and Whigs supported them. • In those days, city bankers tended to be extremely cautious about to whom they lent and for how long. Thirty to sixty days was the norm. • Typically manufacturers and shopkeepers would use these funds to pay their suppliers and workers until they could sell the goods to customers. After that sale they would pay off the bank loan. . • In less settled parts of the country, lending standards tended to be more liberal. There white male farmers could frequently obtain bank loans to buy land and equipment and finance the shipment of farm products to market. Because of the unpredictability of weather and market conditions, loan losses tended to be higher too. Many Kinds of Money: 1832 to 1864 • banks made loans by issuing their own currency. These bank notes were supposed to be convertible, on demand, to cash—that is, to gold or silver. • It was the job of the bank examiner to visit the bank and certify that it had enough cash on hand to redeem its outstanding currency. • Because this was not always done, many bank note holders found themselves stuck with worthless paper. • It was sometimes difficult or impossible to detect which notes were sound and which were not, because of their staggering variety. By 1860 more than 10,000 different bank notes circulated throughout the country. Commerce suffered as a result. Counterfeiting was epidemic. Hundreds of banks failed. Throughout the country there was an insistent demand for a uniform national currency acceptable anywhere without risk. National Currency Act in 1863 & National Bank Act of 1864 These laws established a new system of national banks and a new government agency headed by a Comptroller of the Currency. The Comptroller's job was to organize and supervise the new banking system through regulations and periodic examinations. Creating a National Currency: 1865 to 1914 National banks bought U.S. government securities, deposited them with the Comptroller, and received national bank notes in return. By being lent to borrowers, the notes gradually entered circulation. On the rare occasion that a national bank failed, the government sold the securities held on deposit and reimbursed the note holders. National bank notes were produced and distributed through an involved process. Once the basic engraving and printing were done (at first by private printers, later by the U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing), the notes were entered on the books of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, then returned to the printer where the seal of the Treasury Department was stamped on each. National bank notes were the mainstay of the nation's money supply until Federal Reserve notes appeared in 1914. The Banking Crisis: 1929 to 1933
In the last quarter of 1931 alone, more than
1,000 U.S. banks failed, as borrowers defaulted and bank assets declined in value. This led to scenes of panic throughout the country, with long lines of customers queuing up before dawn in hopes of withdrawing cash before the bank had no more to pay out. Who benefited? • The banking crisis was the first order of business for President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The day after taking office, on March 5, 1933, he declared a bank holiday, closing all the country's banks until they could be examined and either be allowed to reopen or be subjected to orderly liquidation. The bulk of this work fell to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). June 1933, Congress enacted federal deposit insurance. Accounts were covered up to $2,500 per depositor (now $100,000). Other laws were passed regulating bank activities and competition, with the objective of limiting risks to banks and reassuring the public that banks were, and would remain, safe and sound. A Capitalist Revolution • During the last quarter century, banking has undergone a revolution. Technology has transformed the way Americans obtain financial services. • Telephone banking, debit and credit cards, and automatic teller machines are commonplace, and electronic money and banking are evolving. • The techniques of bank examination have changed, too. Today OCC examiners use computers and technology to help ensure that the banks they supervise understand and control the risks of the complex new world of financial services. 1913: Creation of the Federal Reserve System In Thorstein Veblen’s The Theory of the Leisure Class. he argues that the modern businessman, including the international banker, is not different from a barbarian because he uses brute force, cunning and competitive skills to make money from others, and then lives off the spoils of conquests rather than producing things himself. Modern scholars, such as the Professor of Economics Robert Heilbroner, describe robber barons in a similar way. In his book The Worldly Philosophers Heilbroner claims that robber barons used deception, violence, kidnappings and extraordinary dishonesty to gain economic power and industrial supremacy. Robber Baron JP Morgan John Pierpont Morgan (April 17, 1837 – March 31, 1913) was an American financier, banker, philanthropist, and art collector who dominated corporate finance and industrial consolidation during his time. In 1892 Morgan arranged the merger of Edison General Electric and Thompson-Houston Electric Company to form General Electric. After financing the creation of the Federal Steel Company he merged the Carnegie Steel Company and several other steel and iron businesses to form the United States Steel Corporation in 1901. He bequeathed much of his large art collection to the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City. At the height of Morgan's career during the early 1900s, he and his partners had financial investments in many large corporations. By 1901, he was one of the wealthiest men in the world. He died in Rome, Italy, in 1913 at the age of 75, leaving his fortune and business to his son, Jack Pierpont Morgan. List of businessmen who were called robber barons John Jacob Astor (real estate, fur) – New York City Andrew Carnegie (railroads, steel) – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Jay Cooke (finance) – Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Daniel Drew (finance) – New York state James Buchanan Duke (tobacco) – near Durham, North Carolina James Fisk (finance) – New York state Henry Flagler (railroads, oil, the Standard Oil company) – New York City and Palm Beach, Florida Henry Ford (automobile) – Dearborn, Michigan and metropolitan Detroit, Michigan Henry Clay Frick (steel) – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and New York City John Warne Gates (steel, oil) – Chicago and Texas Jay Gould (finance, railroads) – New York (both state and city) Edward Henry Harriman (railroads) – New York state Collis P. Huntington (railroads) – California, Virginia, and New York Mark Hopkins (railroads) - California Charles Crocker (railroads) - California Leland Stanford (railroads) – Sacramento, California and San Francisco, California Morgan’s Scam of 1861 In 1861, he bought 5,000 of useless weapons for $3.50 each and sold them back to the Army for $22 apiece, making $92,500, a small fortune. When [General] Frémont’s soldiers tried to fire these ‘new carbines in perfect condition,’ they shot off their own thumbs…. The government refused to pay Morgan’s bill. Morgan promptly sued the govern- ment…. A special commission… allowed half of [his] claim, and proposed to pay $13.31 a carbine. Morgan… sued [again] …and the court promptly awarded him the full sum, because ‘a contract is sacred’" (Engelbrecht and Hanighen, 1934). Guns and Money In the U.S., the banker is the all-important person in industry.... While few cases are known where an important government official or member of Congress has been a director of an armament firm, all arms manufacturers have important financial connections. In the Morgan group will be found the DuPont Co., Bethlehem Steel Corp., U.S. Steel Corp., together with copper, oil, electric appliances, locomotive, telephone and telegraph interests. This tie-up also leads over into the great banks, including the National City, Corn Exchange, Chase National, etc. It is the Morgan Group of corporation clients and banks which dominate the American arms industry" (Engelbrecht and Hanighen). Morgan cont. After the Civil War, Morgan loaned money to the U.S. treasury at high interest rates. In 1871, he financing the Army’s payroll and in 1877, he refinanced the government’s debt. After his father, Junius, died in 1890, J.P. Morgan began consolidating the family empire. He put himself at the helm of their four main firms, in New York, Philadelphia, London and Paris. Several times in the 1890s, he sold the government gold to shore up the dollar. He also sold official U.S. and British government bonds. BANKS AND INEQUALITY Home ownership is the primary means of passing on wealth to one's descendants, in the form of equity. Because of racist, sexist and class based housing policies in every generation Native and Black Americans and Latinos have been denied effective access to this mode of wealth creation. The result: the median white family possesses eight to twelve times the wealth of the median Black family. This is the kind of wealth that finances college educations, starts young people out in business - in short, the "bootstrap" that people need to hoist themselves up in society, and pass on more wealth to their children. Mortgage lending practices A study of mortgage lending practices in Greater Boston reveals that 71 percent of Black families with household incomes of more than $150,000 a year were paying high interest rates on their mortgages. Less than ten percent of whites in Greater Boston paid high interest rates. High interest rate tax is subtracted every year from the future inheritance of children. • There is far less home equity to borrow against to send the kids to college, or to finance a start-up business concept thought up by a son or daughter. Seventy percent of upscale Blacks pay this tax, compared to less than ten percent of whites in the same income bracket. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to predict the societal results that will accrue 20, 40 and 60 years from now: escalating white upward mobility, and a continuing downward spiral of African Americans. Current banking practices guarantee that ever-greater racial wealth disparities will be locked into the American future. We're not talking about the legacy of past discrimination, but contemporary institutional racism that manifests itself in a regressive tax on Black home ownership - a tax on the economic future of Black people. For people making far less than $150,000 a year, the future is bleak, indeed. The entire banking structure is arrayed against them and their children. In whole Black neighborhoods that look like prosperous "middle class" enclaves are, in fact, devoid of equity, because of race-based interest gouging. The bankers are stealing from Black children. Top ten banks in the USA 1Bank of America Charlotte, NC Billions $6832 billion Citicorp New York, NY $6283 JP Morgan Chase New York, NY $5844 Wachovia Charlotte, NC $3305 Wells Fargo San Francisco, CA $3086 Washington Mutua lSeattle, WA $2047 HSBC Holding London $1278 SunTrust BankAtlanta, GA $1229 U.S. Bancorp Minneapolis, MN $12210 Royal Bank of Scotland Edinburgh $99 • Top ten banking groups in the world 2005 • $)1 United KingdomHSBC79 billion • 2 United StatesCitigroup75 billion • 3 United StatesBank of America73 billion • 4 United StatesJP Morgan Chase72 billion • 5 JapanMitsubishi UFJ Financial Group64 billion • 6 FranceCredit Agricole Group60 billion • 7 United KingdomRoyal Bank of Scotland48 billion • 8 JapanSumitomo Mitsui Financial Group40 billion • 9 JapanMizuho Financial Group39 billion • 10 SpainSantander Central Hispano38 billion IMF & WORLD BANK For poor countries, the IMF and World Bank's emphasis on exports is to a considerable extent an entreaty to exploit cheap labor as a "competitive advantage." But with countries around the world all forced to follow the same strategy, relying on cheap labor becomes a race to the bottom -- with countries forced into a de facto race to the bottom to offer foreign investors the lowest wages and least substantial labor protections. Structural adjustment condition for loans and repayment. --developing nation governments are required to open their economies to compete with each other and with more powerful and established industrialized nations. ----provide lower standards, reduced wages and cheaper resources. • Debt is an efficient tool. It ensures access to other peoples’ raw materials and infrastructure on the cheapest possible terms. Dozens of countries must compete for shrinking export markets and can export only a limited range of products because of Northern protectionism and their lack of cash to invest in diversification. Market saturation ensues, reducing exporters’ income to a bare minimum while the North enjoys huge savings. The IMF cannot seem to understand that investing in … [a] healthy, well-fed, literate population … is the most intelligent economic choice a country can make.
• — Susan George, A Fate Worse Than Debt, (New York: Grove
Weidenfeld, 1990) WORKS CITED • http://www.factmonster.com/ipka/A0801059.html • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_central_b anking_in_the_United_States • http://coat.ncf.ca/our_magazine/links/53/morgan. html • http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=240&Itemid =33 • http://images.search.yahoo.com/ • MONEY AS DEBT http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/135.html