IMPOSTER PHENOMENON AND IT’S CORRELATION WITH

BURNOUT AMONG INDIAN MEDICAL STUDENTS: AN

OBSERVATIONAL STUDY

-Batch D
Table 1: FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF STUDY PARTICIPANTS AS PER STUDY VARIABLES (N=277)

Genderwise distribution
Gender No of individuals Percentage
Male 140 50.5
Female 137 49.5
Total 277 100
Batchwise Distribution
Batch No of Individuals Percentage
1st year 50 18.1
2nd year 54 19.5
3rd year 85 30.7
4th year 67 24.2
interns 21 7.6
Total 277 100
 Socioeconomic Classification (Modified BG Prasad)

SEC Scale Frequency Percentage

Class I 242 87.4
Class II 27 9.7
Class III 8 2.9
Class IV 0 0
Class V 0 0
Total 277 100
 Academic Performance Of Last Year
Academic Performance  Frequency Percentage

Less than 50% 2 0.7

50-55% 17 6.1

55-60% 33 11.9

60-65% 66 23.8

65-70% 77 27.8

70-75% 40 14.4

75-80% 8 2.9

80-85% 18 6.5

More Than 85% 16 5.8

Total 277 100

Table 2 Distribution of participants based on Imposter Phenomenon Characterstics (N=277)

 IP Characterstics Frequency Percent

Low 29 10.5
Medium 85 30.7
High 130 46.9
Intense 33 11.9
Total 277 100

Scale used- Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale Questionnare

Range: 20-100
Mean Score: 61.87
Standard Deviation- 14.82
Table 3 Distribution of participants based on Intensity of Burnout (N=277)

Burnout Intensity Frequency Percent

Low 47 16.96
Medium 200 72.2
High 30 10.83
Total 277 100

Scale used- Oldenburg Burnout Inventory- Student Adaptation

Range: 16-64
Mean Score: 40.02
Standard Deviation- 7.11
Fig 1- Intensity Of Burnout
HIGH
10.83%
LOW
16.96%

MEDIUM
72.2%

LOW MEDIUM HIGH

Table 4 Disengagement and Emotional Exhaustion among Study Participants (N=277)

Disengagement Frequency Percent

Low 41 14.8
Medium 204 73.6
High 32 11.6
Total 277 100
Exhaustion Frequency Percent
Low 47 17
Medium 194 70
High 36 13
Total 277 100

Scale used- Subscales of Oldenburg Burnout Inventory- Student Adaptation

Fig 2-Disengagement Fig 3- Emotional Exhaustion
HIGH LOW HIG
11.6% 14.8% H
[PE
RC
EN LO
ME W
MEDIU TA
DIU [PE
M GE]
M RC
73.6% [PE EN
RC TA
EN GE]
TA
GE]
LOW MEDIUM HIGH

LOW MEDIUM HIGH

 Table 5 Batchwise Variation in Imposter Phenomenon Characterstics (N=277)

IP Characterstics 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year interns
Low 5 4 6 12 2
Medium 10 22 30 16 7
moderate 30 19 42 30 9
High 5 9 7 9 3
 Batch wise distribution of IP Characterstics
45

40

35

30

Low
25
Frequency

Medium
moderate
20
High

15

10

0
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year interns

IP Characterstics
 Table 6 Batchwise Variation in Intensity of Burnout Phenomenon(N=277)

Burnout Intensity 1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year interns
Low 14 5 15 11 2
Medium 32 41 60 52 15
High 4 8 10 4 4
 Batch wise distribution of Burnout Intensity
70

60

50

40
Low
Frequency

Medium
High
30

20

10

0
1st year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year interns

Burnout Intensity
 IP Scale
Table Male
7 Genderwise variation Female
of Imposter Phenomenon Characterstics (N=277)
Low 13 16
Medium 44 41
Moderate 64 66
High 19 14
Table 8 Genderwise variation in Intensity of Burnout(N=277)

Burnout Intensity Male Female

Low 20 27
Medium 103 97
High 17 13
 Socioeconomic Class Distribution of IP Grade
SEC Class  Class I Class II Class III Class IV Class V Total

IP Grade

Low 27 2 0 0 0 29

Medium 74 8 3 0 0 85

Moderate 109 15 5 0 0 129

High 32 2 0 0 0 34

Total 242 27 8 0 0 277

 Academic Performance Distribution of IP Grade
Academic <50% 50-55% 55-60% 60-65% 65-70% 70-75% 75-80% 80-85% >85%
Performance

IP Scale Total

Low 0 1 2 8 10 6 1 0 1 29

Medium 0 3 14 23 22 16 3 0 4 85

Moderate 1 10 13 30 36 12 3 16 9 130

High 1 3 4 5 9 6 1 2 2 34

Total 2 17 33 66 77 40 8 18 16 277
IP * Olbicodes Crosstabulation

Count

Olbicodes
Total
Low Moderate High

Low 11 18 0 29
Click to add text
Moderate 21 58 6 85
IP
High 12 101 17 130

Intense 3 23 8 34

Total 47 200 31 278