Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inventory Management: P.Chandiran Liba
Inventory Management: P.Chandiran Liba
P.Chandiran
LIBA
Inventory System
Defined
Inventory
raw materials, finished products, component parts,
supplies, and work-in-process.
• Examples
• Difficult to control
• Hides production problems
Independent Demand
Examples
• Spare parts
• FMCG
• Consumer Durables
Dependent Demand
Examples
• Raw Materials
• Sub-assemblies
• Components
• Consumables
Inventories at All Levels
• Inventories can be found throughout the
supply chain
• From Suppliers to Manufacturers,
Assemblers, Distributors and to Retailers
• Inventories also kept at end-customer
level
• Warehouses and In-transit
• Commonly called as Multiechelon
Inventory
Inventory as Buffer
• It act as a buffer that decouples the
supplier from the discontinuousness of
customer demand on the one hand, and
limitations in vendor capabilities to ensure
delivery timing and quantity availabilities
on the other.
Excess Inventory or Stock out
occurs because
• Wrong forecasting and Planning
• No communication between partners
• No trust between partners
• Shipping delay
• Surge in demand
• Lack of Inter-functional co-ordination
• Design of Products/ Process without considering
the supply chain
• Market failure
Basic EOQ model
• Assumptions
– Known and constant demand
– Known and constant lead time
– Instantaneous receipt of material
– No quantity discounts
– Only order (setup) cost and holding cost
– No stock outs
Economic Order Quantity
On-hand inventory (units)
Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive
order
On-hand inventory (units)
Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive
order
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive
order
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive Inventory depletion
order (demand rate)
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive Inventory depletion
order (demand rate)
On-hand inventory (units)
1 cycle
Time
Economic Order Quantity
Receive Inventory depletion
order (demand rate)
On-hand inventory (units)
Q Average
— cycle
2
inventory
1 cycle
Time
Total Cost = Holding Cost + Order Cost
Total Cost = Holding Cost + Order Cost
Annual cost (dollars)
Total cost = HC + OC
Annual cost (dollars)
• TC – Total cost
– Annual Time
– Monthly
– ??
Holding Cost
AnnualHoldingCost
( AveInventory )( HoldingCost / unit / year )
Q
AnnualHoldingCost H
2
Holding cost
3000 —
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 — Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 —
| | | | | | | |
0— 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
AnnualDemand
AnnualOrderCost (OrderCost)
OrderQuantity
D
AnnualOrderCost S
Q
Holding & Ordering Cost
3000 —
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 — Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 — D
Ordering cost = (S)
Q
| | | | | | | |
0— 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
3000 — Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 — Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 — D
Ordering cost = (S)
Q
| | | | | | | |
0— 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
D Q
TC S H
Q 2
What is the annual cost of the current
policy?
D Q
D – Total demand TC S H
Q 2
Q – Order quantity
S – Setup/order cost
H – Holding cost
What is the annual cost of the current
policy?
D Q
D – Total demand
936/year
TC S H
Q 2
Q – Order quantity 936 390
390/order TC 45 15
390 2
S – Setup/order cost
$45/order TC 108 2925
H – Holding cost
TC 3033
= 0.25*60
Total Cost for Q = 390
Current
cost
3000 — Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 — Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 — D
Ordering cost = (S)
Q
| | | | | | | |
0— 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Can the gift shop do better?
Current
cost
3000 — Q D
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 — Q
Holding cost = (H)
2
1000 — D
Ordering cost = (S)
Q
| | | | | | | |
0— 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
Current
Lot Size (Q)
Q
Economic Order Quantity – Q*
3000 —
Annual cost (dollars)
2000 —
1000 —
Setup cost = Holding Cost
| | | | | | | |
0— 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
2 DS
Q*
H
2(936)(45)
Q* 74.94 75units / order
15
Total Cost of Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) –
Q*
D Q*
TC S H
Q* 2
936 75
TC 45 15
75 2
When Q = 390
TC 1124.10 TC 3033
When to order?
• Reorder point (ROP)
– Lead time – amount of time from order
placement to receipt of goods
– Lead time demand – the demand the occurs
during the lead time
Reorder point
Order
received
On-hand inventory
OH
Reorder point
Order
received
On-hand inventory
OH
Order
received
On-hand inventory
OH
L
TBO
Lead time
Reorder point
Order
received
On-hand inventory
OH
R
Order
placed
L
TBO
Gift shop reorder point
• Demand: 18 birdfeeders/week
• ROP: 36 birdfeeders
Gift shop order policy
• Place order when the on-hand inventory is
36 birdfeeders.
• Order 75 birdfeeders
• Order received in 2 weeks
• Place next order when the on-hand
inventory is 36 birdfeeders
Gift shop order policy
Order
received
On-hand inventory
75
OH
36
Order
placed
2 wks
Distribution Game
• What is the EOQ
for the central
warehouse in the
distribution game?
• Order cost: S = $200
– Demand: D= 2190
Distribution Game
2 DS
Q*
H
2(2190)(200)
Q*
14.7
Q* 244.1 244units
Problem 1
• Alpha industry estimates that it will sell
12,000 units of a product. The ordering
cost is Rs.100 per order and the carrying
cost is 20% of the purchase price per unit.
The purchase price per unit is Rs. 50. Find
• a. Economic order quantity
• b. No. of orders per year
• c. Time gap between successive orders
Problem 2
• A Hospital procures its supplies of a material
once a year. The total number procured is 2400
packages in a year. This policy of procuring
material once a year is being questioned. The
accountants calculate the cost of inventory
holding at Rs. 36 per package per year. It is also
figured out that the costs of procurement add up
to Rs. 1,200 per order. What inventory policy
would you advise to this hospital?
Problem 3
• Suppose that the R & B Beverage company has a soft-
drink product that has a constant annual demand rate of
3600 cases. A case of the soft-drink costs $3. Ordering
costs are $20 per order and holding costs are charged at
25% of the cost per unit. There are 250 working days per
year and the lead time is 5 days. Identify the following
aspects of the inventory policy.
• Economic order quantity
• Reorder point
• Cycle time
• Total annual cost
Average Inventory
• The average inventory in EOG practice is
Q/2
• When order size decreases, the average
inventory decreases.
• When average inventory decreases, the
capital locked in inventory also decreases.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
• A measure supply chain performance
• Inventory Turnover ratio= Total Rupee
sales per period /Average inventory per
period
• If you sell more with less inventory , you
are better
ABC Analysis
Expected demand
during lead time
ROP
Price
Quantity (Rs)
0≤ Q1 10
≤1199
1200≤Q2≤ 9
1999
2000≤Q3 8
(i) Find the optimal order size.
(ii)If the order cost is changed to Rs.300 per order, find the optimal order size.
Impact of supply uncertainty
• D: Average demand per period
D: Standard deviation of demand per
period
• L: Average lead time
sL: Standard deviation of lead time
SD of demand and supply
during LT
DL DL
L L D D
2 2 2
s L
SS for supply and demand
uncertainty
• ROP= Ave. demand X Ave. LT + SS
• ROP = DL+Zσ L
P-System
Periodic Review Method
• an alternative to ROP/Q-system control is periodic
review method
• Q-system - each stock item reordered at different
times - complex, no economies of scope or
common prod./transport runs
• P-system - inventory levels for multiple stock
items reviewed at same time - can be reordered
together
• higher carrying costs - not optimum, but more
practical
Fixed Period Model
• Answers how much to order
• Orders placed at fixed intervals
– Inventory brought up to target amount
– Amount ordered varies
• No continuous inventory count
– Possibility of stockout between intervals
• Useful when vendors visit routinely
– Example: P&G representative calls every 2
weeks
Using P-System
• audit inventory level at interval (T)
• quantity to place on order is difference
between max. quantity (S) and amount on
hand at time of review
• management task - set optimal T and S to
balance stock availability and cost
• In ABC analysis, which items would use P-
system???
Periodic Review System
(order-up-to)
Inventory on Hand
Review period
RP RP RP
Target inventory level, TIL
Q2 Q3
d1 d3
Amount used during
first lead time
d2
Time
Order 1 placed Order 2 placed Order 3 placed
Next, Compare total cost for the feasible root Q and price break
Q values.
D Q
TC = DC + S+ iC
Q 2
TC(1826)=(10000*1.20)+(10000/1826)*4+(1826/2)(0.02*1.20)
= $12,043.82
TC(2500) = $10,041
TC(4000) = $9,949.20
Price-Break Example
Price
Quantity (Rs)
0≤ Q1 10
≤1199
1200≤Q2≤ 9
1999
2000≤Q3 8
(i) Find the optimal order size.
(ii)If the order cost is changed to Rs.300 per order, find the optimal order size.
Single Period Models
• Placing orders for one period only
• Newsboy problem
• Marginal analysis is used
• This is to stock that quantity where the
profit from the sale or use of the last unit is
equal to or greater than the losses if the
last unit remains unsold.
Newsboy Problem
• MP >= ML
• MP-Profit resulting from the nth unit if it is
sold
• ML-Loss resulting from the nth unit if it is
not sold
• Marginal analysis is also valid when we
deal with probabilities.
Newsboy Problem
• P (MP) >= (1-P) ML
• P-Probability of the ‘n’th unit being sold
• (1-P)- is the probability of the ‘n’th not sold.
• P>= ML/(MP + ML)
• It means, we should continue to increase the
size of the inventory so long as the probability of
selling the last unit added is equal to or greater
than the ratio.
• Salvage value can be included in the problem
Problem
• A product is priced to sell at $100 per unit and
its cost is constant at $70 per unit. Each unsold
unit has a salvage value of $20. Demand is
expected to range between 35 and 40 units for
the period. 35 units definitely can be sold and no
units over 40 will be sold. The demand
probabilities and the associated cumulative
probability distribution (P) for this situation are
shown in Table. How many units should be
ordered?
Table
No. units demanded P of this demand
35 0.10
36 O.15
37 0.25
38 0.25
39 0.15
40 0.10
41 0
Solution
• MP= 100-70=$30
• ML=70-20=$50
• The optimal probability of the last unit
being sold is P>=ML/(MP+ML)
• P>=50/80=0.625
Table
Units of P of demand P of selling (MP) (ML) Expected Net Profit
Demand ‘n’ th unit Expected marginal loss of (MP-ML)
marginal nth unit=(1-P)*ML
Profit of nth
unit=P*MP
35 0.10 1.00
30 0 30
36 0.15 0.90
27 5 22
37 0.25 0.75
22.50 12.50 10
38 0.25 0.50
15 25 -10
39 0.15 0.25
7.50 37.50 -30
40 0.10 0.10
3 45 -42
41 0.0 0.0
Solution
• According to cumulative probability table, the
probability of selling the unit must be equal to or
greater than 0.625, so 37 units should be
stocked. The probability of selling 37th unit is
0.75. The net benefit of stocking the 37th item is
the expected marginal profit minus the expected
marginal loss.
• Net= P(MP)-(1-P) (ML)= $10
Inventory policy during trade
promotions
Concept of forward buy
Trade Promotion
• Offered by manufacturer to
retailer
• It can be a discounted price for
limited time period
• Quite common in consumer
packaged goods
Objectives of Trade Promotion
• Induce retailers to use price promotions,
displays or advertising to spur sales
• Shift inventory from the manufacturer to
the retailer and the customer
• Defend a brand against competition
Retailer response to trade
promotion
• Pass through some or all of the promotion
to customers to spur sales
• Pass through very little of the promotion to
customers but purchase in greater quantity
during promotion period to exploit the
temporary reduction in price
Trade promotion induces forward
buy
• A forward buy is the amount that a retailer
purchases in the current period for sales in
future period
• As a result the cycle inventory and flow
time increases within the supply chain.
• What is the retailer’s optimal response
when faced with promotion?
Inventory profile for forward buying
I
Qd
Q* Q* Q*
t
Inventory model for forward buying
Annual demand –R; Price per unit- C; Holding cost fraction –
h;
S-ordering cost
_______
Q*= √2RS/hC
Discount offered is Rs ‘d’ per unit for coming four week period
Qd -lot size ordered at discounted price
TC=Holding cost + Ordering cost + Material cost
The retailer must order a lot size which minimizes total cost
Assumptions made for this
model
• Discount will be offered only once in a
year
• The order quantity Qd is multiple of Q*
• The retailer takes no action to influence
the consumer decision (The customer
demand remains unchanged)
Optimal order size
• Optimal order size for this situation is
given by the formula Qd= [dR/(C-d)h]+
[CQ*/(C-d)]