The document discusses the Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS). It was first introduced in the US Defense Department in 1961 to integrate planning, programming, and budgeting. PPBS aims to allocate limited resources effectively to achieve organizational goals. It involves specifying objectives, analyzing alternative programs, classifying budgets functionally, and evaluating performance. PPBS integrates decision making but can be complex with multiple objectives and difficult to apply uniformly across government. It emphasizes physical and financial over qualitative performance.
The document discusses the Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS). It was first introduced in the US Defense Department in 1961 to integrate planning, programming, and budgeting. PPBS aims to allocate limited resources effectively to achieve organizational goals. It involves specifying objectives, analyzing alternative programs, classifying budgets functionally, and evaluating performance. PPBS integrates decision making but can be complex with multiple objectives and difficult to apply uniformly across government. It emphasizes physical and financial over qualitative performance.
The document discusses the Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS). It was first introduced in the US Defense Department in 1961 to integrate planning, programming, and budgeting. PPBS aims to allocate limited resources effectively to achieve organizational goals. It involves specifying objectives, analyzing alternative programs, classifying budgets functionally, and evaluating performance. PPBS integrates decision making but can be complex with multiple objectives and difficult to apply uniformly across government. It emphasizes physical and financial over qualitative performance.
The document discusses the Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS). It was first introduced in the US Defense Department in 1961 to integrate planning, programming, and budgeting. PPBS aims to allocate limited resources effectively to achieve organizational goals. It involves specifying objectives, analyzing alternative programs, classifying budgets functionally, and evaluating performance. PPBS integrates decision making but can be complex with multiple objectives and difficult to apply uniformly across government. It emphasizes physical and financial over qualitative performance.
MADHU YADAV (200638) MANISHA YADAV (200640) Origin of PPBS PPBS was first introduced in the Defense Department in the USA in 1961 by Robert McNamara, and in all departments in 1965 until 1975. Introduction PPBS is a new management tool. It can provide powerful assistance to a decision maker by displaying enterprise goals and alternative means of achieving them, including both the oenefits and costs of each alternative. Given that resources are limited, PPBS can lead to their more effective allocation and management. Purpose of PPBS • The purpose of PPBS is to integrate the planning,programming, and budgeting functions of an enterprise into a formal system. • PPBS is based upon three fundamental ideas. These are the concepts of a goal, a program, and effectiveness. PPBS STEPS 1. Planning 2. Programming 3. Budgeting 4. Operations 5. Evaluation Planning Planning is an analytical activity carried out to aid in the selection of the organizations objectives and then to examine courses of action that could be taken in the pursuit of the objectives. Planning, in effect, poses the question of whether some particular course of action would contribute more to the attainment of the organization’s goal than its various alternatives. Programming Programming is the function that converts plans into a specific action schedule for the organization. Programming consists of developing detailed resource requirements and the actions needed to implement plans. Budgeting Budgeting is the activity concerned with the preparation and justification of the organization’s annual budget. The function of budgeting is to secure sufficient funds to put the program into operation. Operations Operations consists of the actual carrying out of the organization’s programs. Preparing for operations is the object of all the other phases. Evaluation Evaluation is the function that evaluates the worth of operating programs. Through program evaluation the worth of programs in attaining goals is measured and appraised. The result of evaluations is used to modify current operations, if indicated, or in planning future programs. Stages of Planning Programming Budgeting System • Specification of Objectives – The objectives of the programmes are to be specified in consistence with the long term goals in quantitative terms as far as possible. • Systemic Analysis – The possible alternative projects to achieve the programme objectives are analyzed in a systematic way with the use of cost-benefit and cost- effectiveness analysis. • Functional Classification - The budget is classified on a functional basis like functions, programmes, projects and activities.
• Organization – Budget formulation addresses the
organizational structure, managerial and administrative procedures of the programs/ projects/ activities.
• Evaluation – The mechanism for evaluation of performance
on the basis of financial and physical performances to monitor, and take corrective actions, if necessary. Advantages of Planning Programming Budgeting System It integrates the process of program/ project formulation, budget allocation and evaluation in a systematic way. It helps in the choice of programs/ projects, allocation of resources on them and performance evaluation for the executive and legislature. It integrates the decision makings regarding the choice of program/ projects to achieve the intended objectives. It attempts to promote maximum social advantage with the prudent (wise-full) use of scarce resources. 1. It incorporates the future budgetary repercussion (may be 3,5,10 years) as per the nature and size of the projects. Limitations of Planning Programming Budgeting System For appropriation and control purposes, expenditures are continued to be classified in the traditional line-item approach. Various objectives budgetary policy makes budgeting complex and confusing. The problem arises in its application in case of multiple objectives of a program/ project that involves different agencies. It is difficult to acquire necessary information regarding performance evaluation and cost estimation in an uniform way in all governmental activities. It emphasizes on physical and financial performance, not on qualitative performance. 1. It intends to centralize the budgetary decision makings. Reference Brown, Timothy A. “Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS): Implications for Library Management (Book Review).” College & Research Libraries, vol. 35, no. 3, May 1974, pp. 215–16. DOI.org (Crossref), doi:10.5860/crl_35_03_215_A. “Management Studies: Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS).” Management Studies, https://analysisproject.blogspot.com/2017/02/planning-programming-budgeting-system.html. Accessed 3 June 2021. 1. Think, Ready to. “Planning Programming Budgeting System (PPBS).” Ready To Think, 1 Jan. 2018, http://www.readytothink.net/management_consulting/work-plan-vision-goals- objectives/planning-programming-budgeting-system-ppbs/ THANK YOU