Beyond the basics discusses special considerations for pediatric prosthetics. Key factors include frequent adjustments and replacements due to growth, family involvement in decisions, residual limb length affecting control, avoiding bony overgrowth through joint disarticulation, proper alignment for comfort and function, and activity-specific prostheses. Future advances aim to improve rehabilitation through a diagnostic device providing real-time feedback on implant loading to guide pain-free positions.
Beyond the basics discusses special considerations for pediatric prosthetics. Key factors include frequent adjustments and replacements due to growth, family involvement in decisions, residual limb length affecting control, avoiding bony overgrowth through joint disarticulation, proper alignment for comfort and function, and activity-specific prostheses. Future advances aim to improve rehabilitation through a diagnostic device providing real-time feedback on implant loading to guide pain-free positions.
Beyond the basics discusses special considerations for pediatric prosthetics. Key factors include frequent adjustments and replacements due to growth, family involvement in decisions, residual limb length affecting control, avoiding bony overgrowth through joint disarticulation, proper alignment for comfort and function, and activity-specific prostheses. Future advances aim to improve rehabilitation through a diagnostic device providing real-time feedback on implant loading to guide pain-free positions.
Special consideration with children • There are many factors to consider when deciding on prosthetic treatment for the pediatric candidate. Socket fit is fundamentally important in the overall fit and function of the prosthesis. If the socket is comfortable and well fitting, the patient should benefit from the functionality it is intended to provide. If it is uncomfortable, the child will reject prosthetic wear. The prosthetist’s expertise will ensure a properly fitted socket. Some common considerations specific to the pediatric population in the prosthetic treatment design discussed in this chapter include frequency of adjustments and replacements, family involvement, residual limb length, bony overgrowth, alignment, activity-specific prostheses, and component size. • Due to growth and higher physical demands of pediatric patients, more frequent adjustments and replacements should be expected compared with adults. Typically, a pediatric prosthetic socket should last 1 year, but this can vary depending on growth spurts and activity level.4 An endoskeletal prosthesis is designed with some postfabrication adjustability to allow for adjustments of the prosthesis and replacement of components (e.g., foot, terminal device, or socket) as needed. Components can be changed to accommodate growth, activity levels, and functional demands of the pediatric • Residual Limb Length • The length of the residual limb affects the control of the prosthesis and design selection. Typically, the longer the limb, the more control the patient has of the prosthesis due to the longer lever arm. A very long or very short limb results in limited component and design options. With disarticulation, the pediatric patient preserves growth plates, retains weight-bearing capability, and avoids bony overgrowth.1,5,6 However, because the disarticulation is through the joint, aesthetics can be a challenge when trying to match the intact side. For example, a knee disarticulation prosthesis will have better control than a short transfemoral prosthesis, but the prosthetic knee center will be lower than the sound-side knee center. • Family Involvement • Family commitment begins with understanding and acceptance of the condition, prognosis, and treatment recommendations. When the patient is very young, the prosthetic treatment plan is decided by the family or caretakers. With age, the child should be more involved in decisions about prosthetic design and treatment. In addition, the very young child will require assistance with donning and doffing, which should progress to independent donning and doffing. • Bony Overgrowth • Bony overgrowth or periosteal overgrowth results from transdiaphyseal amputations3 and is most frequent at the humerus and then the fibula, tibia, and femur4 To avoid bony overgrowth, it is preferable to perform joint disarticulation. This also preserves the growth plate.5 When the soft tissue is unable to grow at the same rate as the underlying bone, the result is painful overgrowth at the distal end, and this frequently results in an inability to wear the prosthesis due to pain and discomfort. A bursa is a good indication of a bony overgrowth developing.3 Most often surgical intervention is indicated to reduce the pain associated with the overgrowth.5 • Alignment • The prosthetist will properly align the prosthesis for maximum comfort and functional capabilities.. Many congenital limb deficiencies have varying angular deformities that must be accommodated in prosthetic design, which can come at the expense of aesthetics.3 Alignment of the lower extremity prosthesis should match that of a normal child’s gait and weight-bearing alignment. For example, an infant typically walks with wide-based gait and flexed at the hips and knees, and therefore, the prosthesis should be aligned similarly.6 • Activity-Specific Prostheses • While the standard prosthesis is typically used for everyday activities of daily living (ADLs), school activities, and around the home and community, activity-specific devices are designed for a single intended activity. Some examples include a running or swimming prosthesis, neither of which is able to be used for everyday walking. For the upper extremities, such prostheses can be designed with a variety of terminal devices for a gymnastics arm or a violin-playing arm, among many other options. • Component Sizes and Options • Fewer component options are available to the pediatric population than to the adult population. Goals and expectations should be discussed with the family and prosthetist to determine appropriate component selection for the child’s functional level, age, and • Passive Prostheses • For the very young child, a passive prosthesis can aid in achieving early milestones such as sitting by using the prosthesis as a prop for balance or crawling by using the prosthesis to help.7 As the child grows, a passive prostheses can continue to be used as a lightweight option for cosmetic reasons. • Suspension • Much like the adult counterpart, traditional harnessing, self-suspending socket designs, and gel sleeves provide good upper extremity suspension options. Self-suspension frequently eliminates the need for harnessing but may require the use of a pull sock. • Terminal Devices • TDs can be passive, electric, voluntary opening, or voluntary closing. Voluntary opening designs for the pediatric population include a hook, or mechanical hands. Although the glove that goes over the mechanical hand can improve aesthetics, it requires more force from the child to operate the device and adds to the overall weight.The electric hand does not require the same force to operate but comes with added weight. Electronic pediatric hands are categorized in one of two grasp patterns through adolescence— palmar prehension (hands) and oppositional grasp (Electrohand by Ottobock)—but they are only available in palmar prehension into adulthood.7 • Myoelectric • The externally powered prosthesis should begin with single-site activation and progress to dual-site activation as the child exhibits cognitive capabilities and site control. An example of single-site activation includes voluntary opening and automatic closing. The myoelectric components add weight and bulk due to a heavier electric hand and the addition of sensors and a battery to the design. However, the externally powered devices eliminate cabling and add aesthetic value. Electric elbows are available to the school age child, like the VASI 8-12 elbow by Liberating Technologies, which is an example of an electric elbow available to children and preteens.7 Consulting with the local prosthetist is important to understand what components are available and best suited to the patient. Adaptive prosthesis for recreation Future prosthetic advances and challenges • Strengths of bionic limbs • Promising life-changing benefits of bionic limbs showed by long-term efficacy studies are compelling for patients. The direct attachment of the prosthesis through an osseointegrated implant has immediate benefits. It eliminates all typical burden associated with a socket, particularly the residuum’s skin problems. It eases attachment and removal of the prosthesis. It also provides a much more comfortable sitting position and allows a much larger range of movements. • Weaknesses of bionic limbs • Occurrence and severity of adverse events with bone-anchored bionic prostheses are yet to be fully resolved. Bionic limbs can potentially cause issues with implant stability, bone fracture, breakage of the implant parts and infection. All these adverse events have several common negative effects. They cause pain. They significantly disturb the lifestyle because they limit usage of the prosthesis for prolonged duration. They also cost money paid either by the healthcare system or the users themselves as out-of-pocket expenses. • Features of the diagnostic device • Different sensors assess the mechanical constraints applied by the bone- anchored bionics on the residuum and measure the resulting movements of the tissues (bone, muscle, tendon, fat, skin) within the residuum. The back end the device consists of the software integrating all this information into a personalised digital twin of the residuum. Basically, the digital twin of the residuum is a virtual replica living inside the computer. It corresponds to the high-fidelity physics-based model of the different tissues constituting the residuum. The front end of the device consists of a handheld device (such as a smartphone) that provides a visual animation of the model in real time so that patients and clinicians equipped with the device and see can how movements impact the inside of the body. • Improving rehabilitation for patients • The diagnostic device provides a radically new and empowering experience for patients. It can help them monitor how their loading positions stimulate specific zones of the implant in real time using a friendly-user interface and guide them to adopt pain-free positions. By improving stability, it can reduce risks of loosening, fractures and infections. It can also allow patients to better inform clinicians about how a treatment or intervention feels. Altogether, this new approach can increase the quality of life of individuals suffering from limb loss. Future surgical and educational advances and challenges • Traditionally, EMG signals have been recorded by surface electrodes, which have the advantage of being non-invasive. However, several factors may degrade EMG signals interpreted by surface electrodes and consequently interfere with limb function. These include anatomic factors such as excessive adipose tissue or a compromised soft tissue envelope; physical factors that compromise the muscle- prosthesis interface such as sweat pooling under the device, a change in limb position, or motion; and “cross talk” between adjacent muscles [18]. As a result, there has been substantial research into devices that address communication challenges between the patient and their prosthetic. • The investigators implanted four electrodes in the forearm of an adult volunteer using a 10 mm skin incision. With this approach, the implants are constructed of two disks connected by a stem and are designed to provide more reliable muscle signal detection than traditional surface-based electrodes. One disk is located on the skin surface while the other rests deep to the dermis; the stem traverses the skin. The implants have superior electrical properties and less mechanical interference than current surface-based electrodes. The authors concluded these novel electrodes could serve as an interface for myoelectric control in prostheses while surpassing many drawbacks of traditional surface electrodes. • Surgical Innovations • Several recent surgical innovations have improved the functionality of myoelectric prostheses. • Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) is a surgical procedure that gives traumatically or surgically transected nerves a new motor target. The procedure has dual advantages: preventing or treating painful neuromas and improving myoelectric prosthesis functionality. By giving the transected nerve “somewhere to go and something to do,” it regenerates in an organized fashion and is less likely to develop a painful neuroma After TMR, muscle reinnervated by the transected nerve produces EMG signals and becomes a myosite, a signal for a myoelectric prosthesis. In this way, a patient can intuitively control the prosthesis through activation of muscular targets whose identity and function have been “reassigned” to that of its new motor nerves TMR was first developed among patients with shoulder disarticulations and above-elbow amputations. However, this powerful procedure is now being used among patients with transradial, transfemoral, and transtibial amputations to optimize myoelectric prosthesis functionality (in the upper extremity) and to prevent and treat painful neuromas (in the upper and lower extremities) [ Restoring sensations • Many sensory implants are undergoing research and development. These range from implants placed on or within peripheral nerves to those that directly stimulate the somatosensory cortex. Cuff electrodes (surgically implanted electrodes that are wrapped around a peripheral nerve) preserve nerve integrity, have been used on human subjects in multiple studies, and have shown long-term stability but lack the high selectivity of more invasive electrodes • New implantation techniques including syringe injection (as opposed to surgical implantation) are under development as new materials and smaller devices are refined. Some implants, including the USEA, have been able to simultaneously provide both sensation (light touch and proprioception) and motor control of prostheses • Osseointegration • Osseointegration, or the stable integration of implants into bone, was originally investigated by Swedish dentist Per-Ingvar Brånemark and was further developed by his son, Rickard Brånemark. Osseointegrated prostheses such as Brånemark’s Osseoanchored Prostheses for the Rehabilitation of Amputees (OPRA) device (Integrum, Sweden), the Compress Transcutaneous Implant) have an intramedullary component connected to a percutaneous fixture to which the prosthetic limb is attached. Osseointegration addresses or circumvents many of the complications of and restrictions inherent to socket-based prostheses, particularly among patients with compromised soft tissue envelopes (e.g., decreased tissue compliance, history of skin grafting, persistent ulcerations or wounds, underlying heterotopic bone, painful neuromas) or a short residual limb. It also eliminates issues related to socket fit and signal transduction between the myosites and the electrodes, improving the efficiency of these devices. • Advanced Rehabilitation: Augmented and Virtual Reality • Rehabilitation physicians, therapists, and prosthetists have begun to employ augmented and virtual reality platforms to optimize prosthesis design, incorporation, and use. On the design side, the development of a virtual limb prosthesis has been used to test devices prior to their construction in a virtual reality environment. The authors describe virtual prostheses as highly versatile and applicable to multiple rehabilitative situations, to include simulation of prosthetics prior to production. •Thank you •best of luck