Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hubspot and Motion Ai - Chat Enabled CRM Case
Hubspot and Motion Ai - Chat Enabled CRM Case
CRM case
To understand how customer relationships are created, nurtured, and
built by firms through customer relationship management (CRM)
programs
1 CEM
Take a look at Hubspot's sales&marketing process and
discuss which activities /phases of funnel (ToFu, MoFu,
BoFu) would Chatbots do better than Humans?
How might customer behaviour change when they interact
with bots and how would it affect relationship management
and profitability?
How might Hubspots’ acquisition of Motion AI affect its
relationship with its own customers?
How would you assess the potential for chatbots for B2C and
B2B customer relationship in general? Under what
conditions do Chatbots have most /least potential?
2 CEM
3 CEM
HubSpot has to attract 100 million website visitors to
generate 40,000 customers (or 2,500 website visitors to
generate 1 customer
high number of visitors (96%) who are unwilling to reveal
personal information during the early stages of the buying
process
(scoring below a 7-10 rating on lead qualification
measures)- lead qualification – 40 % qualifies high cost of a
salesperson ($120,000 per year) and the long purchase
journey (45 days)
13.5 % of qualified leads get to a demo stage and of this
20% goes for sales closure
4 CEM
5 CEM
6 CEM
Acquisition cost
8 CEM
9 CEM
Bots vs Humans -Relationships
Humans are naturally relational and will Bots, given their unlimited ability to
be more proficient than bots at navigating digest and respond to reams of
the complex process of forming, nurturing,
information, might be better be able
and managing a customer relationship
to deal with the complexity of
Customers might form different types of
relationships with bots (perhaps more relationship negotiation than human
exchange-type relationships) than with chat reps
humans (perhaps more communal-type Bots’ lack of inherent customer
relationships) “empathy” will help them negotiate
Customers will feel freer to break relationships that are more favorable
relational rules or test relational
boundaries with bots than they might with
to firms as they prove resistant to
humans, leading to increased costs-to- customers’ attempts to improve the
serve. relationship in their own favor
10 CEM
Bots may more efficiently acquire Customer Lifetime Value
customers, but humans may more
effectively retain them ??
= (profit per year * years
Or, that bots might easily acquire
in lifetime) – customer
customers, but those customers acquisition cost
might generate lower profits per
year than those acquired by
humans, who have the ability to
better match solutions to their
particular problems and to upsell
and cross-sell them
11 CEM
Chatbot opportunity for Hubspots
customers
Will the firm disclose or keep hidden the fact that
consumers are interacting with a bot?
Will the bot speak in a consistent, brand-consistent voice
or be flexible enough to mimic the voice of the customer?
How human-like should the bot be? Will the bot be
programmed with a utility/functional user interface (UI) or
a conversational UI? Why?
Transparency
Voice flexibility
UI and UX design
12 CEM
Closing thoughts
62% of consumes want chatbots to have a human-like
voice
62% - have human-like intellect
57% -to understand human emotions and respond to them
55% -to have the ability to provide greater empathy
54% - to exhibit human-like behavior and personality
(Survey by Capgemini)
13 CEM
What matters
Relational intelligence: The ability to interpret relational
signals to discern the type of relationship consumer desires
Relationship negotiation prowess: Ability to navigate
interactions with the customer to continuously deliver and
strengthen desired relationship to provide mutual value
A conversational UI: A robust and empathetic user-
interface that allows sensing and responding to relational
cues
14 CEM
How AI based platform provide value (Dawar, 2018)
15 CEM
Customer Engagements &Brand
relationships
Assessing Customer Engagement and brand relationship
Customer Engagement in virtual brand community
Facebook and Other Social Network platforms
Customer Engagement in offline brand community
16 CEM
Customer Brand Value (CBV) Frame work
Recall the discussions on CBBE frame work and measures
of Brand Equity
17 CEM
Positive Brand attitude drives future purchase intention
and recommendation intention
It is crucial to not only measure and interpret the financial
value generated by the brand for the customer but also to
consider the customer’s perception of the brand
18 CEM
Which one would you invest in ?
Brand A
Brand B
19 CEM
(a) Brand A’s target (a) future size of the
segment is 45- to 60-year- segment and (b) future
old customers and (b) spending power
Brand B’s target segment
is 18- to 30-year-old
customers firms need to base their
decisions on a forward-
looking approach, how
does this approach result
in higher profitability for
the firm?
20 CEM
21 CEM
CSK – Revenue Vs Brand Value
2019 –Revenue 2019- Brand Value CSK Market Valuation
(Speculative / Unlisted
share trading/Grey
market premium)
INR 356 Cr INR 732 Cr Around INR 1000 Cr
Income
Grant Central rights BCCI
– INR 240 cr
Brand CSK sponsorship
income – INR 68 Cr
22 CEM
23 CEM
24 CEM
25 CEM
Fan centric social strategy-Brand
community
26 CEM
27 CEM
Fan Generated content
28 CEM
29 CEM
https://venturebeat.com/2021/01/15/greenpark-sports-
launches-early-access-for-sports-and-esports-social-platform/
30 CEM
31 CEM
32 CEM
Linking CLV To CBV
Communication plays a vital role in linking CBV to CLV.
Planned and unplanned marketing communications such
as word of mouth, product messages, marketing-mix
activities, corporate activities, and marketing initiatives all
constitute brand communication and contribute to
messaging
33 CEM
34 CEM
Measured Brand Value –Example
35 CEM
Step 4- Linking CLV TO CBV
Examine Brand Knowledge of each customers and how it is transferred to Brand attitude
Build Awareness thru Trials
Build Trust thru’ Adverts
36 CEM
37 CEM
Step -6-Implementing Strategies -segmentation
High
CLV
Low
CLV