This document discusses biopiracy, which is the unauthorized use of indigenous knowledge or genetic resources without compensation. It provides examples of biopiracy such as companies patenting turmeric, neem, and enola beans without acknowledging the traditional knowledge of the indigenous communities in India and Mexico. The document also discusses tissue piracy cases where researchers took biological samples from indigenous communities in Papua New Guinea and the Philippines without consent. Overall, biopiracy damages local economies and traditions by restricting access to resources and knowledge that indigenous groups developed.
This document discusses biopiracy, which is the unauthorized use of indigenous knowledge or genetic resources without compensation. It provides examples of biopiracy such as companies patenting turmeric, neem, and enola beans without acknowledging the traditional knowledge of the indigenous communities in India and Mexico. The document also discusses tissue piracy cases where researchers took biological samples from indigenous communities in Papua New Guinea and the Philippines without consent. Overall, biopiracy damages local economies and traditions by restricting access to resources and knowledge that indigenous groups developed.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
This document discusses biopiracy, which is the unauthorized use of indigenous knowledge or genetic resources without compensation. It provides examples of biopiracy such as companies patenting turmeric, neem, and enola beans without acknowledging the traditional knowledge of the indigenous communities in India and Mexico. The document also discusses tissue piracy cases where researchers took biological samples from indigenous communities in Papua New Guinea and the Philippines without consent. Overall, biopiracy damages local economies and traditions by restricting access to resources and knowledge that indigenous groups developed.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Olivar, Alexia Allyssa G. WHAT is BIOPIRACY? the appropriation, generally by means of patents, of legal rights over indigenous knowledge --- particularly indigenous biomedical knowledge --- without compensation to the indigenous groups who originally developed such knowledge. ► From the root words “bio” and “piracy”, biopiracy literally means “the patenting of life.” ► Genes of living organisms are basically the “raw materials” of new biotechnologies. ► Genetic materials from plants, animals, and other biological resources that have long been identified and developed, are being “owned” by companies and manufacturers through patents. ► Collection of genetic materials are usually taken without prior consent. The following illustrate how early acts of biopiracy have been committed:
► 3500 years ago, Egyptian rulers began bringing
plants home after military expeditions.
► In the last century, the British Empire instituted
regular plant collections. During the Voyage of the Beagle, Charles Darwin simply took what interested him and brought it home. Traditional Knowledge Biopiracy This kind of biopiracy covers the unauthorized use of common traditional knowledge, whether acquired by deception or on the basis of exploitative transactions. Various patents can claim traditional knowledge in the form it was acquired, or cover a refinement or an invention based on it. Genetic Resource Biopiracy This type of biopiracy is about the unauthorized extraction and use of widespread resources and of those found only in one location. It also covers authorized extraction of resources on the basis of exploitative transactions. Patents claim the resource itself, even derivatives or purified versions of it. WHAT IS BIOPROSPECTING? the legal and accepted exploration and search of biological products with characteristics and traits interesting, appealing and necessary for mankind. In the past, bioprospectors are mainly concerned with the biodiversity existing in different regions of this planet for previously unknown compounds in organisms that have never been used in traditional medicine. WHAT ARE PATENTS? gives an individual or a firm the right and the privilege to a limited legal monopoly and control to make, use and sell its invention and/or discovery. Also, this gives an individual and a firm the right to exclude others from making, using or selling the invention to the market.
To be patentable, an invention must be novel,
useful and non-obvious. Patentable articles fall under FOUR categories: (http://businessdictionary.com/definition/patent/html
• Machine: any apparatus or device with
interrelated parts that function together to perform the designed or planned purposes. • Manufacture: manufactured or fabricated items • Process: mechanical, electrical, chemical or other methods that produce a chemical or physical variation in the condition or state of an item • Composition of matter: chemical compounds or mixtures possessing properties different from their constituent ingredients. POPULAR CASES OF BIOPIRACY IN THE WORLD Turmeric (Curcuma longa Linn.)
•used as a spice for flavoring Indian cooking.
•an effective ingredient in medicines, cosmetics and dyes. •traditionally used for centuries to heal wounds and rashes. •1995 - 2 expatriate Indians , University of Mississippi Medical Centre Suman K. Das and Hari Har P. Cohly granted a US patent on use of turmeric in wound healing. • CSIR files for Re-examination •1997 – patent revoked The Neem Tree (Azadirachta indica) Neem Tree (India) In 1995 the U.S. Department of Agriculture and a pharmaceutical research firm received a patent on a technique to extract an anti-fungal agent from the Neem tree (Azadirachta indica), which grows throughout India. Indian villagers have long understood the tree's medicinal value. Although the patent had been granted on an extraction technique, the Indian press described it as a patent on the Neem tree itself. Legal action by the Indian government followed, with the patent eventually being overturned in 2005. The pharmaceutical company involved in the Neem case argued that traditional Indian knowledge of the properties of the Neem tree had never been published in an academic journal. In response to this, India has been translating and publishing ancient manuscripts containing old remedies in electronic form to protect the country's heritage from being exploited by foreign companies. The Enola Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) Enola Bean (Mexico) This bean is a variety of Mexican yellow bean, so called after the wife of the man who patented it for the variety's distinct shade of yellow in 1999. The patent-holder subsequently sued a large number of importers of Mexican yellow beans, causing economic damage to more than 22,000 farmers in northern Mexico who depended on sales of this bean. A law suit was filed on behalf of the farmers, and on April 14, 2005 the US-PTO ruled in favor of the farmers. An appeal was heard on 16 January 2008, and the patent was revoked in May 2008. The Banaba (Lagerstroemia speciosa) Banaba and other medicinal plants (Philippines)
Japan has been patenting the country’s native
plants with medicinal properties, such as banaba, saluyot, sambong, lagundi, and takip kuhol. These plants have been the subject of patent claims there.
Pharmaceutical firms in Japan have started to
process these plants as medicines and claimed the knowledge as their own, when in fact, the healing properties of these herbs have been known in the Philippines for ages. Bitter guard Bitter gourd (Thailand) Since Thailand has a big problem with AIDS, their national scientists have been researching for all sorts of ways to help relieve the suffering the victims experience, and maybe even prevent against the infection of the HIV virus.
One team was focused on bitter gourd
(Momordica spp.), and they found certain compounds in it that work against HIV. Later on they found out that American scientists have copied their research and have already patented the active Map- 30 protein from a native strain of bitter gourd. HUMAN TISSUE PIRACY AND TISSUE CULTURE DID YOU KNOW THAT… In 1996, Hagahai tribes, natives of Papua New Guinea, gave blood, tissue and hair samples to Carol Jenkins, an American anthropologist, and took soap, candies and chocolates in return. Hagahai people’s tissues were utilized to produce a drug used to battle leukemia, for these people’s blood has HTLV-1, which is resistant to the said disease. These people had no knowledge of this production; however, through the help of NGOs, the tribe sued this incident to the World Court. Recently, they have been remunerated for the theft of their tissues, but unfortunately the patent still remains with Jenkins and her company. “FILIPINO” VERSION In 2000, two Philippine non-governmental organizations (NGOs) --- the Cordillera Peoples Alliance (CPA) and the Igorot Tribal Assistance (ITAG) revealed that there were Ifugao tribe’s people who were enticed into sharing their blood to foreign scientists who posed as medical researchers. After collecting blood and hair samples from the tribe’s people, nothing was heard from these scientists.
A similar luring incident was reported by a Baguio City-based
United Nations accredited Indigenous Peoples International Center for Policy Research and Education or Tebtebba Foundation. The foundation reported on how the Aeta tribe’s people, a group of Aeta displaced by the Mount Pinatubo eruption in the province of Zambales, were fooled into providing a foreign medical group who pretended to be aid workers their blood samples. WHAT DOES IT ALL BOIL DOWN TO? • DEPLETION OF RESOURCES • DAMAGE TO THE ECONOMY OF THE SOURCE COUNTRY • BAD EFFECT ON THE TRADITIONS OF THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE BECAUSE OF THE PATENTS Why is There a Need to Stop Biopiracy? ► Because of the patenting of biological materials, the locals of the affected countries would have less, if not none at all, access to those new developments which is possibly their original idea or discovery in the first place. Those who are granted the patents would have exclusive rights to their “inventions” and can therefore raise the prices if they choose to. ► By having the license to do whatever they please, patent owners can also hinder the local production. This can have a large impact on the livelihood of those concerned; the ones who are normally free to use as much of the crops or produce as they need are banned from manufacturing such goods. Therefore, if those goods are a source of income for them, they would lose much of the profits that they usually get. ► Patent owners can prohibit farmers from breeding such plant and animal varieties as well. In doing so, they have also taken away privileges that the indigenous people have rightfully earned themselves.
► As the patent owners benefit from the information
and materials that they do not actually “own”, the indigenous people who have long been developing and cultivating these resources get nothing. They do not have a choice unless knowledge of the materials has been proven traditional and the patent has been canceled. Actions Taken Against Biopiracy Bioprospecting Contracts To minimize the detrimental effects of biopiracy and to “legalize” such transactions, there is the so-called “bioprospection contract.” With this contract, economic income or royalties would be provided to the local communities concerned while the patent owners generate earnings. However, the fairness of these contracts has been a subject of debate. Unethical bioprospecting contracts and breaking the contract can be viewed as new forms of biopiracy, and would therefore bring about certain consequences. ► Patents can be cancelled once traditional knowledge of such biological material is proven to be of traditional knowledge, or known in a local community for a long time. ► A collector or researcher must agree to provide an equitable share of benefits to the locals concerned before he or she could obtain biological samples. Failure to do so may deny him or her access to such samples. ► If there is no “prior informed consent” of taking biological materials from a local community, profits can be taken from the researcher and the affected locals can retrieve such in the court. The researcher would not be able to pass on illegitimate samples to collaborators and other third parties, as well. ► If the rules of bioprospecting have been violated, the patent owner would be labeled as a “biopirate.” By having this title, one can instantly lose his or her credibility and this can lead to a chain of unfortunate occurrences. It may also cause him or her to be sent to jail. Patent Law In the United States, patent law is used to protect “isolated and purified compounds” that were newly discovered and invented. A patent is the exclusive rights given to a person so that others will be prohibited in making, using, or selling the invention. One common misunderstanding is that pharmaceutical companies patent the plants they collect. While obtaining a patent on naturally occurring organisms is not possible, patents may be taken out on specific chemicals isolated or developed from plants. Convention on Biological Diversity The 1993 Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) establishes sovereign national rights over biological resources and commits member countries to conserve them, develop them for sustainability, and share the benefits resulting from the use. Sustainable use of biological resources means finding new drugs, crops, and industrial products, while conserving the resources for future studies. Sovereign rights would be tempered by providing access to genetic resources, in exchange for a share of the benefits, including access to biotechnology. end