This document provides an introduction to the study of globalization. It discusses globalization as a multidimensional set of social processes that create worldwide social interdependencies and exchanges. Globalization refers to the expansion and intensification of social relations and consciousness across world-time and world-space. It also discusses different dimensions of global flows including ethnoscapes, technoscapes, mediascapes, financescapes, and ideoscapes. The document examines globalization as a condition of changing social interconnectivity rather than an ideology and how the term has been contested but also promoted an ideology of expanding free markets known as globalism.
This document provides an introduction to the study of globalization. It discusses globalization as a multidimensional set of social processes that create worldwide social interdependencies and exchanges. Globalization refers to the expansion and intensification of social relations and consciousness across world-time and world-space. It also discusses different dimensions of global flows including ethnoscapes, technoscapes, mediascapes, financescapes, and ideoscapes. The document examines globalization as a condition of changing social interconnectivity rather than an ideology and how the term has been contested but also promoted an ideology of expanding free markets known as globalism.
This document provides an introduction to the study of globalization. It discusses globalization as a multidimensional set of social processes that create worldwide social interdependencies and exchanges. Globalization refers to the expansion and intensification of social relations and consciousness across world-time and world-space. It also discusses different dimensions of global flows including ethnoscapes, technoscapes, mediascapes, financescapes, and ideoscapes. The document examines globalization as a condition of changing social interconnectivity rather than an ideology and how the term has been contested but also promoted an ideology of expanding free markets known as globalism.
This document provides an introduction to the study of globalization. It discusses globalization as a multidimensional set of social processes that create worldwide social interdependencies and exchanges. Globalization refers to the expansion and intensification of social relations and consciousness across world-time and world-space. It also discusses different dimensions of global flows including ethnoscapes, technoscapes, mediascapes, financescapes, and ideoscapes. The document examines globalization as a condition of changing social interconnectivity rather than an ideology and how the term has been contested but also promoted an ideology of expanding free markets known as globalism.
Group 1: Amistad, Edrian Digamo, Chris Basco, Denny Lacson, Mark Binondo, Steve Languido, Jessie Collamar, Nazarene Siona, JP OBJECTIVE • Discuss Globalism’s Morphology, centering on its ideological status INTRODUCTION
• System of ideas which is determined by economic class
conflict and which reflects and promotes the interests of the dominant class
• ‘Current fragmentation of established ideologies and
uncerntainty whether ideology exists’ highlighted the difficulty of capturing changing morphologies of political belief system What is Globalization ? • Refers to the expansion and intensification of social relations and consciousness across world-time and world-space. It is a multi-dimensional phenomenon involving economics, politics, culture, ideology, environment, and technology. What is Ideology? • A form of social or political philosophy in which practical elements are as prominent as theoretical ones. It is a system of ideas that aspires both to explain the world and to change it. Globalization: process, condition, or ideology
• Globalization denotes not an ideology but a range of
processes nesting under one wieldy epithet (Michael Freeden)
• Conceptual unwieldiness arises from the fact that global flows
occur in different physical and mental dimension, divided by Arjun Appadurai into ethnoscapes, technoscapes, mediascapes, finanscapes, and ideoscapes. ETHNOSCAPE • Refers to the flow of people across boundaries. While people such as labor migrants or refugees (see case study below) travel out of necessity or in search of better opportunities for themselves and their families, leisure travelers are also part of this scape. TECHNOSCAPE • Refers to flows of technology. Apple’s iPhone is just one example of how the movement of technologies across boundaries can radically affect day-to-day life for people all along the commodity chain. MEDIASCAPE • Refers to the flow of media across borders. In earlier historic periods, it could take weeks or even months for entertainment and education content to travel from one location to another. FINANCESCAPE • Refers to the flow of money across political borders. Like the other flows discussed by Appadurai, this phenomenon has been occurring for centuries. IDEOSCAPE • Refers to the flow of ideas. This can be small-scale, such as an individual posting her or his personal views on Facebook for public consumption, or it can be larger and more systematic. • ‘Globality’ means a future social condition characterized by thick economic, political, and cultural interconnections and global flows that make existing political borders and economic barriers irrelevant.
• “ not to say it precludes further development buy rather
points to a social condition destined to give way to a new distinct constellations. • Globalization is a set of complex, sometimes contradictory, social processes that are changing current social condition based on the modern system of independent nationstate.
• ‘a multidimensional set of social processes that create,
multiply, stretch, and intensify worldwide social interdependencies and exhanges. • It is about the unprecedented compression of time and space as result of political, economic, and cultural change.
• The term suggests ‘development’ or ‘unfolding’, and denotes
alteration of present condition.
• This focus on Change explains why scholars pay attention to
shifting temporal modes and reconfiguration of social and geographical space. • Though remained ‘unwieldy epithet’, but successfully decontested in public discourse in 1980’s – 1990’s
• ‘Globalist’ constructed/ disseminated narratives/ images that associated
the concept of globalization with expanding ‘free’ markets
• ‘Globalism’ a rising political belief system with core claims advocation:
o Deregulation of markets o Liberalization of trade o Privatization of state-owned enterprises o Dissemination of ‘American values’ o Support of global war on terror • Popular support for globalization was high in poor countries of the global south
• 19 countries surveyed in 2004 by the University of Maryland, 55%
believed globalization was positive for them, against 25% negative
• Globalism is a ‘strong discourse’, difficult to resist as it relies on
the power of common sense – the widespread belief that its prescriptive program derives from an objective description of the ‘real world’. THE END THANK YOU FOR LISTENING!