Principal Appraisal Techniques Cost Benefit Analysis Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking Project Selection – Transparency Issues Project Selection – Selection Criteria Overview Project Appraisal Project Financing Tendering Project Management – Role of Implementing Body Project Management – IT Based System Project Reporting to Monitoring Committee Value for Money – Definitions EIA Project Selection – General Principles • Programme and Measure Objectives • Economic Impact – taking account of Deadweight and Displacement • Financial Viability – PPP and productive Sector Projects • Cost effectiveness • Environmental Impact • Impact on equality of opportunity • Impact on poverty • Impact on rural development Principal Appraisal Techniques • Financial Analysis • Cost Benefit Analysis • Cost Effectiveness • Scoring ; Weighting ; Ranking • Multi Criteria Analysis (M.C.A) Cost Benefit Analysis APPLICATION KEY LIMITATIONS FEATURES Essential to Comprehensive Impacts require demonstrate Comparison of common the economic costs and monetary costs and benefits, numeraire benefits of including non- Data demands projects from market. can be the perspective considerable of the national Treatment of economy or risk. Can have social welfare Can include inadequate estimation of political or multipliers Source: Fitzpatrick Associates: Review of Project Selection Procedures and Appraisal Techniques in the CSF May 1999 social (5) acceptability Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking (SWR) • The criteria against which projects will be appraised are identified • A weighting is assigned to each criteria based on importance (no weighting = equal value) • Each project receives numerical score against different criteria • Different project applications ranked against each other Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking (SWR) Criteria Score (0-5) Weight Revised Score ECONOMIC IMPACT Contribute to OP Objectives Impact on Employment Risk of Deadweight Risk of Displacement Cost Effectiveness NON-ECONOMIC IMPACT Contribution to OP Objectives Environmental Impact Impact on Equal Opportunities Spatial Impact Project Appraisal – Scoring, Weighting, Ranking (SWR) Criteria Score (0-5) Weight Revised Score Commercial/Financial Appraisal Market Need Projected Sales Demand Financial Projections Risk of not Achieving Forecasts Access to Matching Funding Ability of Promoter to Achieve Forecasts Long-term Exchequer Implications Scheme-Specific Criteria Total Score Project Selection – Transparency Issues • Public Promotion • Eligibility Criteria Published • Criteria for selection available • Weightings for criteria available • Decisions made by Committee • Conflicts of interest avoided (Declarations) • Information given to unsuccessful applicants • Competitive or queuing basis • Appeals system in place Project Selection – Selection Criteria • Included in Operational Programme Objectives • Measure specific objectives • Economic Impact • Financial Viability • Cost-Effectiveness • Horizontal Principles: Environment: rural development Poverty: Equality • Scoring: Weighting: Ranking Project Appraisal – Procedure • Idea • Initial contact • Business Plan / Formal Application • Site visit to project • Appraisal by staff • Assessment by Evaluation Committee • Board decision Project Appraisal – Criteria for Assistance • You must show: • that the project is commercially viable • That there is a market for the product or service • That adequate finance will be available to fund the project • That the promoter has the management and technical capacity to handle the project • That the promoters tax affairs are in order and proper company structure Project Selection - Procedure • Initial call for applications – 2 stage process • Assessement of Proposals • Initial review by Regional Tourism Organisation • Assessment and scoring of proposals by Fáilte Ireland • Assessed by Fáilte Ireland Assessment Committee • Considered and approved by Product Management Board Project Selection - Procedure • Short-listed applications complete detailed proposal form • Evaluation by Fáilte Ireland evaluation team • Assessment Committee review recommendations • Product Management Board consider – approve, defer or reject Procedure – Monitoring & Evaluation • Monitoring of Programme at three levels • Implementing Agency • Monitoring Committee level • National (NDP/CSF) • Grantee must retain all records and have available for inspection • Retain records of account for 6 years (Irish Law) • Retain records 3 years following closure of programme • Grantee must file annual financial statements Procedure – Monitoring & Evaluation • Grantee must file annual financial statements • Grantee may have to provide evidence of satisfactory management and financial control procedures • Work must comply to all planning conditions • Regular progress reports on work • Security – Deed of Covenant or Mortgage • Grant paid in two instalments – Interim and Final Paid eligible expenditure Evidence matching funds Check no grant aid from other sources Project Financing • Public Sector –Project provision included in annual budget estimates of Central Government Department –EU receipts also included –Recouped in arrears by Exchequer following verification of expenditure Project Financing • Private Sector –Project Approved in advance of commencement –Project payments made in arrears on basis of verified expenditure (stage payments allowed) –Balance of funding provided by promoters own resources, borrowings or other equity investment –Equity and loan finance also included Tendering • Quotations and Tenders – Up to €800 – Two oral quotations – €800 to €8,000 – Two written quotations – €8,000 to €16,000 – Three written quotations – €16,000 to €32,000 – Four written tenders – €32,000 to €160,000 – Full tender in at least two regional newspapers and/or national newspapers – €160,000 and over – Advertisement in Official Journal of EU and national newspapers Project Management – Role of Implementing Body • Design of overall scheme • Seek applications by public advertisement • Review and approval of project applications received from project promoters • Ongoing monitoring of projects • Reviewing progress expenditure, final project costs and irregularity reports if applicable • Review, approval and payment of project manager payment claims • Prepare claims for Managing Authority on to Paying Authority Project Management – IT Based System • Financial Control Systems • Financial Tables • Physical Indicators • Annual Implementation Reports • Other Reports by period county, field of intervention • Actual expenditure reports • Claims for draw down • Payment details • Report on receipts and outstanding claims • Funds allocation, dispersal instructions Project Reporting to Monitoring Committee • Introduction – description measure, commentary on progress • Expenditure to date • Performance Indicators – progress to targets • North/South Co-operation • Information and Publicity Requirements • Horizontal Issues – Environment; Gender Equality; Poverty; Rural Development • Future Prospects • Adjustments required • Annexes Value for Money - Definitions • Additionality: Measure of economic output i.e. amount of project output compared to what would have occurred without intervention • Deadweight: Opposite to additionality i.e. could project have proceeded without State Aid • Displacement: Activities that would or could have been financed by the private sector are displaced by publicly subsidised activity • Cost-effectiveness: Projects selected contribute the largest amount possible to policy objectives at the minimum possible cost.