Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kozel Career Talk 2015
Kozel Career Talk 2015
2
Widespread agreement: its a tough job market and breaking into development
requires passion, persistence, and patience coupled with a lot of luck. There are
things you can do to increase you chances… we will discuss some today
There is an enormous amount of material on the web focused on jobs in
international development including
Websites providing guidance, with related job-boards (e.g. DevEx)
Alanna Shaikh’s, Chris Blattman’s really helpful blogs e.g.
http://chrisblattman.com/2009/04/20/getting-a-job-in-international-development/
Conventional job boards e.g. ReliefWeb, UNJobFinder.org (good site, includes internships and
entry level jobs), career pages run by firms e.g. Gates, Chemonics, DAI, etc.
Facebook group “International Jobs for Young Professionals” with 116,900 (!) current members
Coupled with many articles, books, advice…
Research and read!
What kind of work do you want to do, in what role? (be deliberate! And
think longer term)
Diplomatic and administrative (working for/with governments)
Technical expert, including program management
Humanitarian aid (the classic “aid worker”)
On which issues (what are the hot issues in development?) and in what
settings?
Finance and macro; business innovation, private sector development; energy!
Service “basics” – health, education, water and sanitation
BRICs? Conflict affected countries, fragile states? 4
Then explore…
Which agencies/firms do that kind of work?
What skills do you need, how can you equip (and distinguish) yourself substantively
from 1000s of other job seekers?
specific skills are particularly important for internships, entry level jobs
What are effective approaches towards getting a job in the field?
Job boards are good for knowing what’s out there, but personal contacts are still the main route
into jobs, esp entry level jobs.
NETWORK!
Lots of good advice online i.e. start with modest expectations, volunteer, be willing to do office,
work, be flexible, passionate about change (but not about salary and benefits…) and so on.
Come across as a sound potential team member with interesting skills
Will come back to this…
5
Learn about how the aid system works: much
development work is financed by “foreign aid”
7
Who gives ODA?
Most ODA (80%) is given in the form of bilateral assistance from one
country to another
Typically through bilateral development agencies e.g. USAID, DFID, JICA, CIDA,
SIDA, Saudi Fund for International Development
Many countries e.g. the U.S. have multiple aid agencies e.g.
USAID, Millennium Challenge Corp, Depts of Agriculture Defense, Health and Human
Services, Census, also Peace Corps
Some aid provided in cash, but 70-75% is provided in goods (e.g.
agriculture products, medicines) and services (technical assistance)
Big push-back in recent years against “tied aid”, food aid, and use of TA
(expensive consultants and travel)
Many “aid conscious” donors no longer allow tied aid, good in many respects
but also problematic given..
Ongoing shift from pure-development objectives to more commercial interests
in defining relationships between rich and poor countries
Even true e.g. for Norway in terms of its relationship with Vietnam (example)
8
Net Official Development Assistance (ODA)
(USD millions, 2012 – WDI)
30000
25471
25000
20000
17172
15307
15000
0
s y lia da s rs
US
A
on UK an ce pa
n
ra
d en o
uti rm an J a t na lan ed on
tit Fr Au
s Ca he
r
Sw d
s Ge t A C
In Ne rD
EU h e
Ot
9
ODA donor-country estimates (previous
slide) also includes multilateral aid
Countries provide bilateral (direct) ODA as well as (indirect) aid
through multilateral institutions
Major institutions include
World Bank, IMF, MIGA and IFC
UN organizations
European Union (EU) institutions, including the EC
Regional banks e.g. AfDB, ABD, IADB
Different rationales for multilateral aid, but generally
Less tied to national interests, politics (no longer accept tied aid)
“whole-sale” provision, lower overhead costs.
Global harmonization of aid, shared global objectives
10
World Bank is the largest multilateral aid
institution
Initially the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
(IBRD),
founded at the Bretton Woods conference in July 1944
To finance the reconstruction of Europe after WWII
Shifted to focus on countries outside Europe with the advent of the Marshall
Plan (1947), until 1968 focus on building economic infrastructure – e.g. ports,
roads, irrigation systems
1970s, revised focus on basic needs including education and health
McNamara introduced focus on poverty
1980s, difficult era of structural adjustment, expanded lending to Africa
1990s through present
More diversified lending portfolio, more open processes (in response to harsh criticisms
in 1980s), greater focus on environment, social concerns
11
More WB…
World Bank is heavily dominated by US interests, with strong ties to the US treasury
All WB presidents are US, nominated by the US president
Beginning to change with in response to changing distribution of wealth, changing global financial
flows (including but not limited to aid flows)
World today looks very different than 1970s/80s
World Bank consists of five affiliated institutions operating in 100+ countries (20,000+
staff and consultants)
IBRD
International Development Association (IDA)
International Finance Corp (IFC)
Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA)
International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)
Most funding provided by the WB is not aid
IBRD lends to middle income countries at market rates
Borrows from international capital markets, relends to developing countries at cheaper rates than
countries can obtain directly
But demand for IBRD loans has been falling, esp as countries progress, become more creditworthy
and can access international markets
WB has becomes lender of last resort. Increasing exposure in poor, conflict affected and fragile
states 12
IDA provides aid through grants and highly
concessional loans
Donor countries (primarily DAC but increasingly others) contribute funds
to IDA (referred to as IDA replenishment), which are used to provide
concessional loans and grants to IDA eligible countries
IDA eligible – GNI per-capita less than $1215 (2015)
IDA gives grants plus loans on concessional terms e.g. 25-38 year repayment
period, 5 year grace period, initiation fee of only .75%, low interest schedule
Annual lending envelopes determined by Country Policy and Institutional
Assessments (CPIAs)
But there is a lot of momentum in the system, process not transparent
Currently 59 IDA only countries, 18 blend countries (based on creditworthiness),
plus India (can access IDA on “exceptional basis” through 2017)
Several countries that receive high ODA are included on the “blend” list i.e.
Ethiopia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Vietnam, Zimbabwe
Countries with the biggest “exposure” (outstanding IDA loans and commitments)
China, Brazil, Turkey, India, and Indonesia (concessionary, no rush to repay)
13
World Bank led by share holders
World Bank controlled by 188 member governments (share holders) with voting
shares determined by capital contributions. Referred to as “the Board”.
Currently
USA is largest share holder with 10.3% voting share (reduced substantially from 16% in
early 2000s)
Japan is second with 8.6%
UK with 6.1%
Germany with 5.5%
France with 3.7%
China with 2.1%
Followed by regional groups of countries, each having 4-5% voting shares
The Board, chaired by the WB president, decides on major policy directions,
reviews all (major) loans and grant agreements.
Very political environment, changing as geo-politics and geography of wealth changes (e.g.
China is now a full voting member, also in ADB board)
US is the only country with veto power… but much less likely to exercise it in recent years.
Controversial loans don’t make it to the Board
14
Other multilateral donors…
15
Other UN Organizations
16
Trends in ODA, 1960-2008 (OECD DAC)
http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/documentupload/MeasuringAid50yearsDACStats.pdf 17
DAC members total net resource flows to
developing countries 1970-2009 (OECD
DAC)
http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/documentupload/MeasuringAid50yearsDACStats.pdf 18
The distribution of
ODA receipts from
DAC countries
1978/9-2008/9
The geographic distribution of
aid responds to changing needs
as well as to changing political
imperatives.
Note reduction in aid flows to
East Asia and Pacific countries as
well as to South Asia, coupled
with sharp increase to sub-
Saharan Africa.
Rise in aid to Europe and Central
Asia reflects the emerging global
financial crisis in 2008-9.
19
Aid allocation based on income
classifications 1960-2009
http://www.oecd.org/dac/stats/documentupload/MeasuringAid50yearsDACStats.pdf 21
Is it all about economic development,
reducing poverty?
Huh. ODA is dominated by bilateral aid.
It should surprise no one to find that ODA is also dominated by (bilateral) foreign policy
objectives, political alliances
Countries provide significant aid to their former colonies
US aid (including ODA) reflects geo-political concerns
Egypt and Israel historically
More recently Afghanistan, Pakistan (also in 80s), South Sudan, Iraq (declining, shifting to Afghanistan)
Development and poverty reduction matters, at least for some donors, also for
multilateral institutions (e.g. IDA, UN agencies)
Greater focus on harmonization of aid, sectoral programs
Country size is relevant
Some donors (and multilaterals) try to improve aid effectiveness through greater selectivity on
countries (esp smaller countries) and sectors
Strengthen fragile democracies, transition to democracy and democratic institutions
Commercial interests, strengthening trade ties are increasingly important in rising
middle income countries
Lets look at the evidence—which countries received the most ODA in 2012?
22
Major ODA recipients – ranked by overall
ODA flows in 2012
Net ODA
($ millions) ODA/capita ODA as % of GNI
Afghanistan 6,725 225 32.6
Vietnam 4,118 46 2.8
Ethiopia 3,261 36 7.5
Turkey 3,033 41 2.4
DRC 2,859 44 10.3
Tanzania 2,832 59 10.3
Kenya 2,654 61 5.3
Cote d’Ivoire 2,636 133 10.1
Bangladesh 2,152 14 1.5
Mozambique 2,097 83 14.0
Pakistan 2,019 11 0.9
West Bank Gaza 2,001 495 16.5
Nigeria 1,916 11 2.5
Ghana 1,808 71 4.6
23
Major ODA recipients (cont)
Net ODA
($ millions) ODA/capita ODA as % of GNI
Egypt 1,807 22 0.7
Syria 1,672 75 ..
South Sudan 1,578 146 15.9
Morocco 1,480 46 1.6
Iraq 1,301 40 0.6
Serbia 1,090 151 12.7
Zimbabwe 1,001 73 8.7
Source: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.ODA.ALLD.CD
24
The quality of ODA is improving:
Reductions in share of aid through ineffective channels, 1979-
2007
26
What does this mean for your job search?
Again, be deliberate, fit your interests
Most Official Development Assistance (ODA) comes with (many) strings—in
terms of country and sectoral/strategic focus. Do these mesh with your
interests?
Ref: USAID Foreign Assistance Dashboard to learn about where US foreign aid goes
Private Development Assistance (PDA) comes with different strings: are
these a better fit for you?
Look into some of the big West Coast NGOs e.g. Gates
And there are increasing opportunities in the private sector… to work
globally, in different country contexts and settings. Do these fit your career
objectives?
Consulting firms, private business is not a bad place to develop skills and get
experience
27
Suggestions on strategies to equip yourself to be competitive
in “your” job market? (including from my sources)
28