Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Umit Topaloglu, PHD - SOA and Interoperability
Umit Topaloglu, PHD - SOA and Interoperability
Umit Topaloglu, PHD - SOA and Interoperability
interoperability
for clinical
research
informatics
environment.
3
Our options
• Develop in house
source
Our needs for clinical research
Due to:
• Minimize the adoption resistance.
• We started from most problematic area
• Minimize the time required to implement all
vs one (we have limited resource)
The Suite at UAMS
Cancer Central Clinical Patient Study Calendar
Participant Registry (C3PR v2) (PSC)
caBIG Hub
OpenClinica Identifies labs, loads
them into the CDMS
and AE system
• Study
• Consents, Versions
• Eligibility
• Randomization/stratification
• Companion studies
• Subject
• Consent signed
• Arm and epoch (with dates)
• Identifiers
• Etc.
C3PR-study and subject service
• We have
• More than 160 studies
• More than 2,000 participant registered.
• We also use in
• Psychiatric Research Institute
• National Children's Study
Patient Study Calendar
12
Common Data Elements for CRFs
We have
• caTissue Suite in our Tissue Bank in
production since December 2008
• Done some customization for our workflow
caTissue
I2B2- more than 300K reports
Data Quality
•Information Quality
22
Current challenge-
•Challenge
•Complexity of issue
•Terminology conversion
Steps and Challenges
1- activity performed
2- participant account number with plan code
3- charge type R, C, I, CNMS etc.
Hospital and
professional
Billing
When we finish
solved.
Questions
utopaloglu@uams.edu