Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Political Science Project Name:Aarushi Class:Xii-F Roll No:1 Topic:Integration of Princely States (Hyderabad and Manipur)
Political Science Project Name:Aarushi Class:Xii-F Roll No:1 Topic:Integration of Princely States (Hyderabad and Manipur)
NAME:AARUSHI
CLASS:XII-F
ROLL NO :1
TOPIC:INTEGRATION OF PRINCELY STATES (HYDERABAD AND MANIPUR)
INDEX
S.NO TOPIC PAGE NO. SIGNATURE
1. WHAT ARE PRINC-
LY STATES ? 1 -3
2. NIZAM OF HYDR-
ABAD 4-6
3. STANSTILL AGRE-
EMENT 7-8
4. RAZAKARS 9-10
5. MAHARAJA OF
MANIPUR 11-13
6. INSTRUMENT OF
ACCESSION(MA-
NIPUR) 14-16
7. MANIPUR AFTER
MERGER AGREEM
ENT 17-19
WHAT ARE PRINCELY STATES?
A princely state, also called a native state, feudatory
state or Indian state (for those states on the subcontinent), was
a vassal state under a local or indigenous or regional ruler in
a subsidiary alliance with the British Raj. Though the history of the
princely states of the subcontinent dates from at least the classical
period of Indian history, the predominant usage of the
term princely state specifically refers to a semi-sovereign
principality on the Indian subcontinent during the British Raj that
was not directly governed by the British, but rather by a local ruler,
subject to a form of indirect rule on some matters. The imprecise
doctrine of paramountcy allowed the government of British India
to interfere in the internal affairs of princely states individually or
collectively and issue edicts that applied to all of India when it
deemed it necessary.
Princely states map
NIZAM OF HYDRABAD
The Nizams were the 18th-through-20th-century rulers of Hyderabad. Nizam of
Hyderabad (Niẓām ul-Mulk, also known as Asaf Jah) was the title of the monarch of
the Hyderabad State (as of 2019 divided between the state of Telangana, Hyderabad
Karnataka region of Karnataka and the Marathwada region of Maharashtra). Nizam,
shortened from Nizam-ul-Mulk, meaning Administrator of the Realm, was the title
inherited by Asaf Jah I. He was the viceroy of the Great Mughal in the Deccan, the
premier courtier in Mughal India in 1724, and the founding "Nizam of Hyderabad".
The Constituent Assembly was eager to disable Manipur from being protectionist so that all Indians would be
allowed to freely move in and around Manipur (Kumar Chaudhari 2 December 1948). They were worried that
many in the Naga Hills were ‘misguided by certain persons into thinking that, with the withdrawal of British
authority, the country would go back to them...’ (Jaipal Singh 30 July 1947). Assam should at any cost be
controlled: if Assam were to go into the hands of somebody who is ‘not in favour of the whole of India,
if Assam were in the hands of an adverse power, the whole of India would have gone too’ (Nichols Roy 19
November 1949). Accordingly, Sardar Patel had to take up ‘my bounden duty to work for the consolidation of
freedom’ (Menon 1985: 93). He used coercive tactics to ensure that the Shillong Accord was signed at any
cost. (Rustomji 1971:107-9).
It is common knowledge to the people of Manipur that the Maharaja was invited to Shillong for some
unspecified discussion with the Governor of Assam in September 1949 and he was compelled to sign the
Merger Agreement dated 21-9-1949 under threat, duress and/or misrepresentation of facts and circumstances.
The said Agreement purporting to be between the Governor-General of India and His Highness the Maharaja
of Manipur did not in terms cede the territory of Manipur State to the Dominion of India but Purported to cede
only the full and exclusive authority, jurisdiction and powers for and in relation to the governance of the State
of Manipur and to transfer the administration of the State to the Dominion Government of India on October
15, 1949. The said Agreement was signed by Shri Bodhachandra Singh, as Maharaja of Manipur, and Shri
Vapal Pangunni Menon, as Adviser to the Government of India, Ministry of State, on behalf or as a delegate or
plenipotentiary of India.