Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 13

Name: Roll No:

Varun Chandna MBA20357

Deepesh Topno MBA20334


Submitted by
Group 1: Aman Ranga MBA20339

Priyansh Madkya MBA20347

M Surya Ramesh MBAA20012


Ingersoll Rand
● Market leader in US stationary Air Compressor industry
● Market share:30% of $660 M market
● Product Categories:
● Type – Reciprocating (recips), Rotary Screw (rotaries), and Centrifugal
● Size – ¾ to 6000 horsepower
● Multiple channel distribution:
○ Direct Sales force
○ Independent distributors
○ AIr centers
○ Manufacturers Representatives
● Minimal Territory overlap
● Inter-channel conflict/competition
Stationary Air Compressor Market
Market Leaders in Each Category
Small (below 25 hp) Medium (25-300 Large (Above 300
hp) hp)
Recip Campbell-Hausfeld Ingersoll-Rand Ingersoll-Rand
Ingersoll-Rand Joy Joy
Rotary Sullair Ingersoll-Rand Ingersoll-Rand
Kaesar Sullair Sullair
Centrifugal - - Ingersoll-Rand
Joy

• IR is leading in all the segments except small compressors (DIY products)


• IR share is about 30% whereas the share of Joy, Sullair, and Atlas-Copco is 10-12% each
Distribution Channels

OEMs and User-Customers


Generic pros and cons for channel allocation
Direct Sales - Zero
Level
Pros Cons

Respond to product performance More fulfillment costs


and customer feedback

Direct customer contact - build Hard to reach all potential


relationships customers

Avoid sharing profits with 3rd party Increases internal workload


distributors

More control Logistic issues


Generic pros and cons for channel allocation –
contd.
Manufacturer - Intermediary -
Consumer (One Level Channel)

Pros Cons

More penetration - wider Less control for the


customer reach manufacturer

Faster fulfillment of orders Profits to be shared

Flexibility and scalability Less technical knowledge for


sales support

Effective logistics support


Channels of distribution – Comparision for
Centac-200
Independent
Direct Sales Force Air centres
Distributors
● Minimal sales cost ● Increase in revenue & ● Increased revenue and
● Better service capability profits of distributors profits
● No training required ● Established network ● Higher profit margins
● Addition to shrinking ● Attention to Centrac- as compared to others
product line 200 ● Attention to Centrac-
● Easy accessibility & 200
serviceability

● Partial attention to ● Low Profit margins ● Only 19 air centres


Centrac-200 ● Intensive technical ● Less penetration in the
● Loss of rotary sales training required market
● More time to deliver ● Lack of attention to ● Intensive technical
and service other compressors training required
● Less control over
distribution
How would distributors benefit from Centac-200?

● Increase in revenue and profits of distributors


● A well established network is going to be a reward for loyal distributors
● Easy accessibility,serviceability and can increase their portfolio
● Company policy favouring distributors which gives preference to distributors when machines are
short of supply
● Distributors also receive specialized training
How would the salesforce benefit from Centac-200?

● Well established service capabilities


● A good addition to shrinking line of direct sales products
● No training required
● Minimal sales cost
Marketing mix perspective:
● Management must develop and operate its
marketing channels in such a way as to
support and enhance the other strategic
variables of the marketing mix.

● Product strategy: IR commands market leader


position on the back of high quality products
and technological innovation, while catering
to the post purchase servicing needs of
diverse set of customers it caters to.
● Price strategy: IR was involved in
competitive pricing in small compressors,
while enjoyed margin benefits in its medium
and larger counterparts.
● Promotion: One of the reasons for its position
as market leader in US was its sales
promotion assistance to its dealers and air
center, or rather a failure of atlas-copco.
Distribution Strategy (alternatives):
● IR should have a omni/multi channel distribution network like it
already have in place, minus the clutter and conflict to serve the
diverse set of customers.
● These customer segments are essentially different in their behavior as
mentioned in the case, so IR can launch same products under different
brand names specifying different technical parameters/ level of service
for both the types, so that no channel cannibalizes the other, and serve
a specific segment of customers.
● It can also change compensation/margins for sales force and
distributors and Acs.
● Another option is cut the direct sales channel altogether, where IR will
handle all the major customers directly, with the sales force no longer
working on a commission basis.
How should IR distribute Centac 200?

● As the Ac’s and Independent distributors have no geographical overlap, and little
difference when it comes to overall cost to the company.
Centac-200 should be distributed through the distributor network and air centres.

● The company has taken responsibility for providing its distributors with a product
line that will yield a good ROI, this product push might ease out the tension between
the two channels

● The penetration in the market can be better done by distributors and the air centres
when compared to sales force as ATLAS-Copco has already captured 30% of oil free
machine market

● The distribution would be consistent with the hp assignment

You might also like