QUESTION STATEMENT

1) Di d t h e t ea m ev o lv e well ?
2 ) D id t h ese ch a ra ct erist ics imp a ct th e wa y in wh ich th e p ro ject tea m e v o l v ed ?

REVIEW.

1) We’ll analyse the characteristics displayed event-by event which hindered

team’s evolution and their impacts, from the next slide.
2) The team did not evolve well. The reason being the various characteristics
displayed by some team-members were polar from the ones that are
expected for working towards a common
Events in team progression Rishi and Siddharth preferred to stay
in their own group and were
reluctant to include others.
Orientation and joined by other members

Stubbornness of the informal Extreme cohesiveness in sub-groups

group, in terms of lack of
understanding, conflict
resolution and differing views
affected the objectives of the
team.
Rishi tried to put down Sara by spoiling
her reputation and proving his
superiority in front of Philly, by
influencing Philly, as Philly was highly
impressionable person.
Spoiled trust within the team
members.
Groupism (encouraged by Rishi, the team
leader)
Lack of cooperation on various levels,
partiality and clashes
Rishi’s motives and purposeful relation-
building with Philly
Sara’s encounter with Rishi and Philly
affecting the team bonding
Rishi encouraged groupism,
personal agenda, and his
lack of leadership affected
the team. He took
advantage of Philly’s
weaknesses to promoted
self-growth and ruins team
members’ image.
Motives of team leader not
in sync with team’s motive.
Sara’s final deliverables
Misleading clients by Rishi and Philly
Sara taking action by approaching HR
manager
HR manager replaces Philly with a
better Team manager
Rishi and Philly lacked
trustworthiness. Rishi was ill-
intentioned to skip protocol and
defame Sara to establish his
superiority as Damage-controller.
While, Philly, despite being the team
manager was unaware about the
company protocol.
This spoiled the company’s image in
front of the clients.