Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group 3 (EHarmony & Unilever Case)
Group 3 (EHarmony & Unilever Case)
By group 3:
-29121008 - Anne
-29121053 - Anas Zakaria
-29121089 - Yorend F
-29121119 - Abdul Aziz L
-29121217 - Lusi WS
-29121304 - Aqila Gabrita
What the eHarmony Candidates
Limitations in Finding a Partner?
1. Limitation for the people who have divorce → when they already divorced
3 times → they can’t use the app
2. Not aims for people with homosexual interest
3. Limit the match because the app separate the people who paid and not
paid
4. Limit the match because the app only leads the people who have same
interest or similarity exact based on the 250 question on the questioner
(“the pool is limited”)
5. Quite expansive to unlock paid features
6. Time consuming to answer the questions (especially for the user who are
not subscribe / paid the app) → the fast tract question is only provided for
the user who paid/ subscribe
7. Finding match who has the same race and religion
What did the eHarmony Candidates
think as their alternative Solutions?
● Finding another dating app which is more comfortable to use, less expensive, giving more
matches, The competitor include:
1. Match.com
2. Niche Site
3. Tinder
4. Coffee meets Bagel
5. SinglesNet
6. Yahoo!
● Have real blindates
● Find it by the candidate itself, for example: by joining new community, club to meet new
people
● Use social media, example: instagram, facebook
● Ask family or friends to match them with others
What are the eHarmony candidates
problems or pain? So, they come to eHarmony.
1. Failure to get partner in real life → try to find one by visiting eHarmony
2. Time limitation to find a partner
3. Limitation of networks to find a good match
4. Psychological problems → loneliness and depression
What are the Harmony
(target segment) characteristics?