Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Role of High Dose Methotrexate in Osteosarcoma - Final
Role of High Dose Methotrexate in Osteosarcoma - Final
Osteosarcoma - YES
Dr.Jayachandran.P.K.
Cyclophosphamide - RMS
VAC
Doxorubicin – active agent
Substitution of Act – D with Doxorubicin
Norman Jaffe 1960s
Lung mets in 6 months after hemipelvectomy complete
resolution
Wataru Sutow and Sullivan
CONPADRI
Cyclophosphamide, ONcovin( vincristine), L-Phenylalanine
mustard. aDRIamycin.
COMPADRI
Cyclophosphamide, Oncovin( vincristine), Hd- Mtx, L-
Phenylalanine mustard. aDRIamycin.
200 pts
5yr DFS 41%
Single agent HD - MTX yielded a 40% disease-free
survival
Weekly high-dose methotrexate, vincristine and
doxorubicin adjuvant therapy
46 patients
5yr RFS – 59%
5yr OS – 78%
Goorin AM, et al. Weekly high-dose methotrexate and doxorubicin for osteosarcoma: the Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute/the Children’s Hospital--study III. J Clin Oncol. 1987 Aug 1;5(8):1178–84.
Goorin AM, et al. The Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/The Children’s Hospital adjuvant chemotherapy trials for
osteosarcoma: Three sequential studies. Cancer Treat Symp. 1986;3:155-159.
MSKCC T7
75pts
Preop and post op Mtx, Vcr, Dox, BCD
12yr DFS – 72%
MSKCC T10
Rosen
Mtx + Vcr Sx
GR Mtx, Dox, BCD
PR Dox, CDDP, BCD
153pts
5yrs DFS – 72%
COSS 77
Single arm
Hd – Mtx (6gm/m2), adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide
100 pts
40 months 71 evaluable patients DFS – 55%
Purfürst C et al, Results of the COSS-77 and COSS-80 studies on adjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma
of the extremities. Klin Pädiatr. 1985 Jun;197(3):233–8.
COSS 80
Randomized 2 arm study
Hd – Mtx (12gm/m2), adriamycin + CDDP
Hd – Mtx (12gm/m2), adriamycin + BCD
No difference in groups
Total cohort at 40 months 115 evaluable patients
DFS 67%
Comparing COSS 77 and 80 55% vs 67% (p <0.05)
dose of Mtx has a important role
Purfürst C et al, Results of the COSS-77 and COSS-80 studies on adjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma
of the extremities. Klin Pädiatr. 1985 Jun;197(3):233–8.
COSS 82
Ransomised 2 arm study
Study arm BCD + M Sx poor response AP
Control arm AP + M Sx poor response BCD
alternating with IP
Ferrari S, et al. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Methotrexate, Cisplatin, and Doxorubicin With or Without
Ifosfamide in Nonmetastatic Osteosarcoma of the Extremity: An Italian Sarcoma Group Trial ISG/OS-1. J Clin
Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2112–8.
SSG VIII
113 pts
Single arm study
MAP SX
GR MAP
PR IE
5 yr MFS 63%
5yr OS 74%
Favorable prognostic factors
Tumour volume < 190 ml
24-h serum methotrexate > 4.5 microM
female gender
Etoposide/Ifosfamide replacement combination did not improve outcome in
the poor histological responders
Smeland S, et al. Scandinavian Sarcoma Group Osteosarcoma Study SSG VIII: prognostic factors for outcome
and the role of replacement salvage chemotherapy for poor histological responders. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl
1990. 2003 Mar;39(4):488–94.
SSG XIV.
2001–2005; SSG
71 pts 63 eligible pts.
Smeland S, et al. Results of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XIV protocol for classical osteosarcoma. Acta
Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):211–6.
MFS at 5 years 69%,
EFS at 5 yrs 65%
OS at 5yrs 77%
Limb salvage procedure rate 90%
Local recurrence rate 3%
Smeland S, et al. Results of the Scandinavian Sarcoma Group XIV protocol for classical osteosarcoma. Acta
Orthop. 2011 Apr;82(2):211–6.
Rizzoli Institute IOR – OS1 study
1983 to 1986, the first neo-adjuvant study
127 patients
Randomized to receive either a moderate (750 mg/m2) or high
(7.5 g/m2) dose of methotrexate added to cisplatin, doxorubicin
and bleomycin, cyclophosphamide and dactinomycin.
Cisplatin was intra-arterially delivered.
12-year DFS was 46% (high dose methotrexate 52%, moderate
dose 38%)
Multivariate analysis significant advantage for patients
treated with high dose methotrexate.
Ferrari S, et al. Long-term follow-up and post-relapse survival in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma of
the extremity treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol. 1997;8:765-771.
Rizzoli Institute IOR – OS2 study
1986 to 1989
Doxorubicin was added to methotrexate and intra-arterially
delivered cisplatin Sx
poor responder ifosfamide in addition to methotrexate,
cisplatin and doxorubicin.
164 patients.
Good histologic response 71%,
5-year DFS 65%
5-year OS 74%
Good responder 5-year DFS - 67%,
Poor responder 5-year DFS - 51% (p = 0.08)
Bacci G, et al. Long-Term Outcome for Patients With Nonmetastatic Osteosarcoma of the Extremity Treated at
the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli According to the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli/Osteosarcoma-2 Protocol: An
Updated Report. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Dec 15;18(24):4016–27.
INT 0133 – intergroup study
2x2 factorial design
Regimen A MAP
Regimen A+ MAP + MTP
Regimen B MAP + I
Regimen B+ MAP + I + MTP
Meyers PA, et al. Osteosarcoma: A Randomized, Prospective Trial of the Addition of Ifosfamide and/or Muramyl
Tripeptide to Cisplatin, Doxorubicin, and High-Dose Methotrexate. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):2004–11.
Meyers PA, et al. Osteosarcoma: A Randomized, Prospective Trial of the Addition of Ifosfamide and/or Muramyl
Tripeptide to Cisplatin, Doxorubicin, and High-Dose Methotrexate. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):2004–11.
Meyers PA, et al. Osteosarcoma: A Randomized, Prospective Trial of the Addition of Ifosfamide and/or Muramyl
Tripeptide to Cisplatin, Doxorubicin, and High-Dose Methotrexate. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):2004–11.
EURAMOS – 1
2#MAP Sx
Good response -
2#MAP 2#MA
2#MAP 2#MA 2#IFN
Poor response
2#MAP 2#MA
MAP/IE for 7 cycles
Whelan JS, et al. EURAMOS-1, an international randomised study for osteosarcoma: results from pre-
randomisation treatment. Ann Oncol. 2014 Nov 24;mdu526.
Whelan JS, et al. EURAMOS-1, an international randomised study for osteosarcoma: results from pre-
randomisation treatment. Ann Oncol. 2014 Nov 24;mdu526.
716 were ramdomised in GR arm
MAP 359 3yr EFS 74%
MAP+ IFN 357 3yr EFS 77%
P=0.21
Bielack SS,et al. Methotrexate, Doxorubicin, and Cisplatin (MAP) Plus Maintenance Pegylated Interferon Alfa-
2b Versus MAP Alone in Patients With Resectable High-Grade Osteosarcoma and Good Histologic Response to
Preoperative MAP: First Results of the EURAMOS-1 Good Response Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol.
2015 Jun 1;JCO.2014.60.0734.
618 Randomised In Poor responders
MAP 310 3yr EFS 60%
MAP/IE 308 3yr EFS 57%
P= 0.8
More Gr3/4 febrile neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in
MAP/IE group
More non hematological toxicity in MAP/IE group.
Marina NM et al. Comparison of MAPIE versus MAP in patients with a poor response to preoperative
chemotherapy for newly diagnosed high-grade osteosarcoma (EURAMOS-1): an open-label, international,
randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug 25;
Why YES
All protocols designed most of them incorporate
HDMTX
Time tested therapy in Osteosarcoma
Still the newer trials also incorporate HD – MTX as a part
of protocol
No major proven toxicities of HDMTX as it is.
THANK YOU…
I welcome Dr.Manu to speak against HDMTX
REBUTTAL
EORTC 80831 – EO1 Study
The conclusion of this study was that both treatment arms
were tolerable with no difference in toxicity
DFS was better for 2 drug regimen without methotrexate.
It was however, not a true comparison of addition of MTX
as total doase and dose intensity in two arms are
substantially different.
Those randomised in 3 drug arm recieveed only 66% of
CDDP and DOX
Final conclusion of this study is that total dose and dose
intensity are important predictors
Bramwell VH, et al. A comparison of two short intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in operable
osteosarcoma of limbs in children and young adults: the first study of the European Osteosarcoma
Intergroup. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;10(10):1579–91.
EORTC 80831 – EO1 study
Bramwell VH, et al. A comparison of two short intensive adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in operable
osteosarcoma of limbs in children and young adults: the first study of the European Osteosarcoma
Intergroup. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol. 1992 Oct;10(10):1579–91.