Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dissertation Viva Sreemoyee
Dissertation Viva Sreemoyee
Research Problem
Research Questions
1. Are concerns about inter-grade language proficiency
of the target group at Nurbuling Manichaur
Secondary School related to affect?
2. Can a curriculum that integrates Social Emotional
Learning with Listening and Speaking skills help to
address concerns of affect and in turn increase
language proficiency?
3. If it can help, what are the factors of Social
Emotional Learning that help to address affect and in
effect, cause measurable change in listening and
speaking skills of the students?
Literature Review
The review of literature for this study can be categorized under
four main area:
1. Social Emotional Learning – CASEL, Gutteridge and Smith
(2010) Caldarella, Christensen, Kramer & Kronmiller (2009)
2. Conceptualizing Affect – Krashen (1985), Stevick (1980),
Arnold (2011), Fleckenstein (2006), Bartlett (1932)
3. Humanistic Language Teaching– were Gattegno (1972),
Curran (1972), Moskowitz (1978), and Stevick (1980, 1990).
4. Current ELT Practices in Nepal – Davies (2009) Sah (2014),
Kumar (n.d), Prem Phyak, Bal Krishna Sharma and Shyam
Sharma (2014), Dinesh Kumar Thapa (n.d),
Methodology
Pre Tests:
TOEFL based Listening and Speaking Proficiency Tests
Adaptation of the 30-item self-report questionnaire, The Positive Affect
Negative Affect Schedule– Child Form (PANAS-C)
Intervention: Activities based on Creating an Emotionally Healthy
Classroom (Gutteridge and Smith, 2010). Core Emotions:
Happiness, Courage, Fear and Anger. Vocabulary Building through
Role Plays and
Learner Narratives
Post Tests: Secondary adaptation of the pre-tests that will determine
changes in both listening and speaking proficiency levels as well as
positive and negative affect as experienced during the course of the
intervention. Excellence and Service
Christ University
Data Interpretation
• The quantitative data collected through the pre and post tests
studied for correlation between the cumulative scores for
affect and language.
• A Pareto Analysis was also conducted of the affect scores to
determine the factors that have the most influence on learning
abilities.
• Detailed case by case distinction in order to answer the
question of how SEL addresses affect was attempted through
the interpretation of qualitative data collected through
journaling, tasks and recordings of learner narratives.
Quantitative Findings
Quantitative Findings
Implications
Bibliography
Arnold, Jane ed. (1999). Affect in Language Learning. London: Cambridge UP.
Arnold, Jane. 2011. Attention to Affect in Language Learning. Anglistik. International Journal of
English Studies, 22/1,11-22.
Bartlett, Frederic. (1932). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. London:
Cambridge UP.
Collaborative of Academic and Social Emotional Learning (CASEL)
http://www.casel.org/what-is-sel/ Date of Access: 20.8.2017
Curran, C. A. Counseling-learning: A whole-person model for education. New York: Grune and
Stratton. (1972).
Davies, Alan. ‘Professional Advice and Political Imperatives’ in The Politics of Language
Education: Individuals and Institutions. ed. J. Charles Alderson. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
(2009).
Dickinson, L. (1987). Self-Instruction in Language Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Fleckenstein, K.S. (2006). Defining affect in relation to cognition: A response to Susan McLeod.
JAC, 11(2).
Bibliography cont.
Gutteridge, Daphne and Vivien Smith. (2010). Creating an Emotionally Healthy Classroom.
London: Routledge.
Nóirín Hayes, Perspectives on the relationship between education and care in early childhood.
Dublin: National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. (2007).
Gadd, N. Towards less humanistic English teaching. ELT Journal, 52,(3), 1998, 223-33. doi:
10.1093/elt/52.3.223.
Gattegno, C. Teaching foreign languages in schools: The silent way. New York: Educational
Solutions Inc. (1972).
Kandel, Rajan Kumar. Resolving ELT Challenges Through Critical Thinking Strategies. Journal of
NELTA Surkhet: 4. (2014).
Kumar, Sajan.
http://www.academia.edu/4657304/STOP_CHANTING_THE_SAME_OLD_MANTRA_TIME_T
O_DECONSTRUCT_ELT_IN_NEPAL
. Date of access: 18.6.2017
Krashen, Stephen. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman. (1985).
Maslow, A. H. Toward a psychology of being. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand. (1962).
Moskowitz, G. Caring and sharing in the foreign language class: A sourcebook on humanistic
techniques. Massachusetts: Newbury House. (1978).
Excellence and Service
Christ University
Bibliography cont.
Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Phyak, Prem, Bal Krishna Sharma and Shyam Sharma. Shifting Focus: Building ELT Practices
and Scholarship from the Ground Up.
https://neltachoutari.wordpress.com/2014/01/01/shifting-focus-building-elt-practices-and-scholars
hip-from-the-ground-up/
. Date of access: 25.6.2017.
Rogers, C. R. Client-centered therapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.(1951).
Sah, Pramod Kumar.
https://neltachoutari.wordpress.com/2014/02/01/need-of-evolution-continuing-the-discourse-to-pr
actice-for-local-elt-practices-in-nepal/
Date of access: 22.6.2017
Stevick, E. W. Teaching languages: A way and ways. Rowley, MA: Newbury House. (1980).
Stevick, E. W. Humanism in language teaching: A critical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University
Press. (1990).
Thapa, Dinesh Kumar,
http://www.academia.edu/9490230/A_Reform_Agenda_in_ELT_in_Nepal_Proposal_for_Creating
_ELT_Resource_Centre_in_the_System_of_Education
. Date of access: 16.6.2017
Young, Dolly Jesusita. (1999). Affect inExcellence and Service
Foreign Language and Second Language Learning.
Christ University
Thank you!