Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter5 Bubbles Panics Crashes and Crises
Chapter5 Bubbles Panics Crashes and Crises
Why study?
Tight credit
FDIC
Insures deposits
Glass Steagall
Separates commercial banks from investment banking
Great Depression
Regulatory Responses
Program trading
Tape delays
Portfolio insurance
Index arbitrage
Dotcom Crash 2000
Nasdaq 1000 to 5000 second half of decade 1990s
Average 1st day gain 68%. 117 IPOs more than doubled on 1st day
Bubble burst: March 2000 to October 2002 Nasdaq lost 78% of value
All-Transaction House Price Index for the United States
Global Financial Crisis
Housing boom 1990’2-2006
Criminal behavior
Inadequate regulation
CDO
CDS
Agency Problems
Principal (Investor) depends on and is at risk to Agent
(Mortgage Broker)
Banks pass on risk, lose incentive for credit diligence
Rating Agency conflicts
Information problems – Investors have misleading,
inaccurate credit information
Common Features: Run-up and Crisis
Phases
Runup
disruption- new innovation in tech or finance
Base of support
Spreading interest
Profit-taking
Early entrants sell interests
Crisis
Where did buyers go?
Minsky moment: identifiable incident/sudden crash
Boom Phases
Cryptocurrencies
Fintech opportunities
AI
Democratization and decentralization of finance
The Financial Stability Board 2017
Monitoring operational risk from third-party service providers
Mitigating cyber risks
Monitoring macrofinancial risks
Cross-border legal issues and regulatory arrangements
Governance and disclosure frameworks for big data analytics
Assessing the regulatory perimeter and updating it on a timely basis
Shared learning with a diverse set of private sector parties
Further developing open lines of communication across relevant
authorities
Building staff capacity in new areas of required expertise
Studying alternative configurations of digital currencies
Mark Cuban (2015)
current enthusiasm for tech stocks look a lot like the dotcom
bubble of 2000.
earlier investments were in public markets as opposed to a high
percentage now in private markets where prices are opaque and
buyers and sellers cannot meet as easily.
“Back then…the companies the general public was investing in
were public companies. They may have been horrible companies,
but being public meant that investors had liquidity to sell their
stocks.”
Are Cuban and others right about tech stocks overvalued or is
there a new paradigm?
And if they are right is this an acceptable risk?