Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Health Management Information Systems Assessment: Final Presentation May 23, 2006
Health Management Information Systems Assessment: Final Presentation May 23, 2006
Health Management Information Systems Assessment: Final Presentation May 23, 2006
Information Systems
Assessment
Final Presentation
May 23, 2006
Storage technology
Communications technology
Network
How do IT and IS work
together?
Operational
Programs & Projects, HR, Finance
level
West, East,
14 sites, 10 sites,
23% 16%
Kigali City,
12 sites
20%
South,
13 sites,
21%
North,
12 sites,
20%
HMIS Assessment Sites
Visited, by Type
Private, 8 sites
13%
Public, 20 sites
District Office, 33%
7 sites, 11%
Reference
Hospital, 2 sites
3%
Religious
Affiliated, 24
sites
40%
Health Facility Routine Reports
Weekly--Epidemiological (maladies d’alertes)
Monthly--TRACnet, SIS, CAMERWA,
Contractual Approach, Partner reports
Trimester--Tuberculosis
Annual--Facilities
MINISANTE
?
District Hospital District Ex-District
Private Disp.
Health Centers
Community
Health
Workers
ASC ASC ASC ASC ASC (AS)
Performance of Health Facilities in
Submitting Monthly SIS Reports
Health District
Year Centers Hospitals
2003 96.5% 74%
2004 98.5% 88.2%
2005 93.3% 77.5%
January–March 47.3% 35.3%
2006
Data from MoH
Key Strengths of Rwanda’s HMIS
GoR has recognized the importance of a
strengthened HMIS and has set out
ambitious goals for improving it.
Some health centers and district hospital
directors and nurses take the initiative to
analyze and use data to whatever degree
they can.
Health workers expressed a keen interest for
more training and better tools to perform
analysis and learn how to use transformed
data.
HMIS Gaps
Lack of:
Policies for easy access to data and
enforcement of data sharing (while respecting
patient privacy).
Coordination with vertical programs
Communication and coordination within,
between and amongst GoR, donors and
partners.
Communication of current HMIS roles,
responsibilities, procedures, reporting
Information systems human and financial
resources and management
Important data sources (community, reference
hospitals, private health facilities, military)
HMIS Gaps (cont.)
Lack of:
Training on all levels from computer and software
program usage to data entry, quality data, usage of
tools, process and procedure guidelines,
supervision, analysis, usage, feedback, patient
information, and knowledge about how to perform
tasks.
Additional Issues
GESIS does not reflect the new districts and does
not have the capacity to manipulate data and
produce necessary reports.
Heavy site level reporting burdens
Logistical challenges in report submission
(transportation, communication, electricity)
Recommendations:
Immediate Implementable
Actions
1. The GoR needs to determine policies that will facilitate
the effectiveness of a national HMIS
(data access; donor, partner and program involvement
and coordination; flow of data and information; roles etc.)
2. GoR and Donors must devote appropriate resources,
staffing and support to improve the national HMIS
(coordinators, IT and IS specialists, program developers
and training programs)
3. All stakeholders need to improve communication,
coordination and cooperation
Key Recommendations (cont.)
4. Develop long-term HMIS strategy to
meet short and long term needs of GoR,
donors, partners and ultimately inform
decisions to improve the overall healthcare
system
5. Modify existing GESIS program to reflect the
newly defined districts with correct health
centers linked to them as an interim fix
6. Reinforce capacity for Information Systems (IS)
and Information Technology (IT)
Policy
1. Align data standards, data collection tools,
measurement methods, content, feedback, and
technology for all districts
2. Develop policies for easy and efficient access
to health information to avoid individual
organizations having to create parallel
systems (which increases the burden on the
health care provider)
3. Adopt International Classification of Disease
data and Current Procedural Terminology
Communication and Coordination
Private Disp.
Health Centers
Community
Health
Workers
ASC ASC ASC ASC ASC (ASC)
Modifications and
System Development
1. Align GESIS with new districts
2. Integrate community-based data, private
sector, military and referral hospitals
3. Develop systems to record and use patient
information
4. Integrate International Classification of Disease
(ICD) data and Current Procedural
Terminology (CPT) into the new system.
A National HMIS
An ideal system needs to provide useful
information to users at all levels
The whole point of such a system is for people to be
able to get useful, timely and accurate data easily.
The system needs to be able to:
Exchange data with other data systems
Have capacity to store and manipulate
necessary data
Produce graphs and charts
Produce regular and custom reports
Easy accessibility to:
Enter data
Already transformed data
Steps for designing a new or
partially new system
1. Thoroughly understand the organizational
procedures and processes
2. Get input from all levels of the information
system to make sure the system responds to the
needs of users.
3. Commission information systems specialists to
design a system which incorporates either all or
part of the existing system, or design a
completely new system based on the new
organizational procedures and processes and
reporting needs.
How to be Part of the Solution
GoR/MoH:
Policy determination (data access, data sharing, roles and
responsibilities, reporting, including data analysis and usage
into curricula)
Hire capable coordinators,IS, IT specialists at the all levels
of the health pyramid
Clearly communicate policies to all stakeholders