Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Presentation On Surya Bank PVT - LTD
Presentation On Surya Bank PVT - LTD
Surya Bank
Pvt.Ltd
• Topic- suriya bank
• Background of study: To complete
our Business statistic course and
to survey E-banking service of
Surya Bank
• Research Objective
- Broad objective: To
understand about the range of
activities provided by the bank that’s
E-banking and customers satisfaction.
- Specific objective
To evaluate performance of E-
Introduction
banking system
To identify customer expectations
from E-banking system
To discover the gap between
customer expectation and
satisfaction level
To portray the relationship between
E-banking and customer satisfaction
To look for problems and make
necessary recommendation
• Limitations: The survey was done
online.
• Target population: The target population was our classmates. 60 out
of 100 has participated in the survey.
• Research method,
Methodology Raw data codified into measurable information by using SPSS. The data is
used to test sevral hypotheses, mean, coefficient of skewness and kurtosis of
customer's awareness and satisfaction level on e-bank facilities
From the pie chart it we can see that most clients use Savings
bank. Then most of the bank's clients are salarymen or
students. As out of the population of 60 nearly 20(75%) hold
savings and current and both make up of the remaining 15
(25%).
It would seem Surya Banks primary clients are people with
fixed income and students.
(ii)Construct a bar
chart showing the
frequency of usage • The bar chart is
of e-banking by the showing that 16.6%
customers. uses 2-3 times in a
(Question 5) week, 5% daily, 15%
every week, 8.333%
fort nightly, 43.33%
monthly, 11.67% once
in a six month
(iii)Construct a bar chart
comparing the level of
satisfaction with e-
services across the
different age group of • From the bar chart it
customers. (Question 9
vs Question 14) seems that all of the
clients are aged
between 20-30 years
old.
• 2-3 times in a week
1 person's problem solved within 10-15
days.
1 person's problem solved within a month.
• So, Ho is rejected.
(ii) Do the customers
on average at least • Hypothesis
agree that the e- Ho: μ ≤ 3.99
banking facilities
H1: μ>3.99
offered by private
sector banks are • Manually Calculated T-
better than public value is 1.671
sector banks? • P-value 46.05% .099 1.671 2.266
(Question 13b) • Significance level is 5%
So, Ho is rejected
(iv)Test the hypothesis
that the level of
satisfaction of the Ho: μ=μ
customers with H1: μ≠μ
regards to the e-
services provided by we reject Leven’s test
their banks is the same Ho hypothesis.
across the gender Manual T-value -2.013 -2.013
-1.049
P-value is 29.9%
Level of significance 5%
Ho hypothesis is not
rejected.
(v) Test the hypothesis that
both males and females
perceive that private sector Ho: μ=μ
banks are better than the
H1: μ≠μ
public sector banks in terms
of the e-banking services we do not reject Leven’s
provided by them. (Q13b & test Ho hypothesis.
Q15) Manual T-value -2.002 -2.002
-.339
P-value is 74.1%
Level of significance 5%
Ho hypothesis is not
rejected.
(vi) Test the hypothesis that
irrespective of the marital
status of the respondents, Ho: μ=μ
people felt that e-banking
H1: μ≠μ
lacks personal touch. (Q13k
& Q16). we do not reject Leven’s
test Ho hypothesis.
Manual T-value 2.002 .376 2.002
P-value is 70.8%
Level of significance 5%
Ho hypothesis is not
rejected.
•Summary of Result
•In our research we have observed that customer give the most important while selecting a bank following e-services:
Summary of
Add on service & schemes- 5%
Information retrieval- 25%
Ease of contact- 53.3%
Safety- 90%
Result
•
Privacy- 88.5%
Accessibility- 68.3%