Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Supreme 2020 - Trial TM6 - Balinusra
Supreme 2020 - Trial TM6 - Balinusra
Outer city
TM6 is a special type of close loop spatial multiplexing (TM4). In contrast to TM4, only one layer is used. Analysis
Single layer is effective in low SINR, while dual layer give better throughput in high SINR
TM4 TM4
Supports spatial multiplexing with up to four layers
UE report CQI, PMI & RI
Better throughput in good radio condition (cell center UE)
Better peak throughput because using multi layers (in good radio conditions))
TM6
TM6
Single layer
Peak throughput lower than TM4 because only used single layer
Transmission Mode 6 Result
AVERAGE CQI
10.5 100
256 QAM DL USER THP (MBps) PAYLOAD (GB) 10 90
525530.69 9.5 80
9 70
+7.98% 60
Number
8.5
9667628 50
8.92 8
40
7.5 30
7 20
IMPROVEMEN
6.5 10
+4704668 +2.10 +43.7 6 0
5/29 5/30 5/31 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15
481737.98
RANK 2
T
3871344 18 100
7.72 90
16
14 80
12 -100% 70
60
10
50
%
8
40
6 30
Before After Before After Before After 4 *DT activity
20
2 10
0 0
5/29 5/30 5/31 6/1 6/2 6/3 6/4 6/5 6/6 6/7 6/8 6/9 6/10 6/11 6/12 6/13 6/14 6/15
IMPROVEMENT & ACTIVITY
SUMMARY
214%
256 QAM
2196254 to 6900922.00
28.3%
USER THP
7.42 to 9.52 MBps
+9.09%
PAYLOAD
481 to 525 GB
9 CELL EXECUTED
Transmission Mode 6 Result
+7.98% +28.30%
-100%
*DT activity
+9.78%
-7.74% +214%
SE, CQI and User DL Throughput significantly improve while BLER decrease.
In TM6 Rank Indicator doesn’t reported by UE.
Speed Test Comparison In Different SINR on Busy Hour
Spot 1 Spot 4
SINR < 5 SINR > 15
Before After Before After
Test no DL UL Test no DL UL Test no DL UL Test no DL UL
1 3.74 5.59 1 4.72 4.21 1 51.4 38.8 1 46.3 21.5
2 2.12 3.78 2 3.88 3.64 2 50.3 29.7 2 43.9 1.48
3 67.4 27.2 3 45.9 22.6
3 3.77 3.54 3 4.5 4.21
4 45.9 30.2 4 53.9 21.1
4 6.16 4.46 4 2.62 3.03 5 55.7 29.7 5 51.2 18.8
5 1.5 2.73 5 4.23 0.86 TM6 BETTER Average 54.14 31.12 Average 48.24 17.096 TM4 BETTER
Average 3.458 4.02 Average 3.99 3.19
Spot 5
Spot 2 Before After
Before After Test no DL UL Test no DL UL
1 75.8 28.9 1 49.2 22.2
Test no DL UL Test no DL UL
2 55 28.9 2 54.7 26.8
1 24.1 19 1 25.5 14.9 3 60.7 29.2 3 51.4 20.9
2 24.5 23.7 2 27.3 15.2 4 56.4 24.2 4 51.9 26.4
3 20 14.7 3 22.5 18.1 5 49 26.6 5 54.3 29.5
4 23.2 25.8 4 25.6 18.5 TM6 BETTER Average 59.38 27.56 Average 52.3 25.16 TM4 BETTER
5 24.7 24 5 26.3 17.4
Average 23.3 21.44 Average 25.44 16.82 Spot 6
Before After
Test no DL UL Test no DL UL
Spot 3 1 53 29.4 1 53.7 24.8
Before After 2 51.7 29.7 2 55.7 24.5
Test no DL UL Test no DL UL 3 54.9 28.9 3 52.5 29.9
1 17.4 1.83 1 19.5 1.53 4 48.7 28.9 4 52.6 22.9
2 14.5 1.79 2 14.5 1.54 5 54.7 25.5 5 48.9 26.1
Average 52.6 28.48 Average 52.68 25.64
3 18.9 2.23 3 13.7 1.64 MAINTAIN MAINTAIN
4 14.2 4.02 4 15.1 2.61
5 10.2 TM6 have more
5.99 5 downlink
12.2 throughput gain in low SINR as expected due to more robust data using single layer
1.87
Average 15.04 3.172 Average 15 1.838
Speed Test Comparison In Bad SINR on Busy Hour
Before After
Test no DL UL Test no DL UL
1 24.1 19 1 25.5 14.9
2 24.5 23.7 2 27.3 15.2
3 20 14.7 3 22.5 18.1
4 23.2 25.8 4 25.6 18.5
5 24.7 24 5 26.3 17.4
Average 23.3 21.44 Average 25.44 16.82
BEFORE AFTER