Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Table of Criteria

    Uploaded by

    عبدالعزيز حامد المطيري
    Alternative 1 scores the highest with a total of 60 points, followed by Alternative 5 with 53 points, Alternative 2 with 51 points, Alternative 3 with 42 points, and Alternative 4 with 35 points. The alternatives were evaluated based on criteria such as problem clarity, availability of resources and projects for analysis, location factors like infrastructure and environmental impact, and how well each alternative serves its targeted audience. Alternative 1 best addresses the evaluation criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Table of Criteria

    Uploaded by

    عبدالعزيز حامد المطيري
    7 views2 pages
    Alternative 1 scores the highest with a total of 60 points, followed by Alternative 5 with 53 points, Alternative 2 with 51 points, Alternative 3 with 42 points, and Alternative 4 with 35 points. The alternatives were evaluated based on criteria such as problem clarity, availability of resources and projects for analysis, location factors like infrastructure and environmental impact, and how well each alternative serves its targeted audience. Alternative 1 best addresses the evaluation criteria.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Table of criteria

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Alternative 1 scores the highest with a total of 60 points, followed by Alternative 5 with 53 points, Alternative 2 with 51 points, Alternative 3 with 42 points, and Alternative 4 with 35 points. The alternatives were evaluated based on criteria such as problem clarity, availability of resources and projects for analysis, location factors like infrastructure and environmental impact, and how well each alternative serves its targeted audience. Alternative 1 best addresses the evaluation criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    7 views2 pages

    Table of Criteria

    Uploaded by

    عبدالعزيز حامد المطيري
    Alternative 1 scores the highest with a total of 60 points, followed by Alternative 5 with 53 points, Alternative 2 with 51 points, Alternative 3 with 42 points, and Alternative 4 with 35 points. The alternatives were evaluated based on criteria such as problem clarity, availability of resources and projects for analysis, location factors like infrastructure and environmental impact, and how well each alternative serves its targeted audience. Alternative 1 best addresses the evaluation criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Alternative-1 Alternative-2 Alternative-3

    Alternative4 Alternative5
    Evaluation Criteria (Loai) (Khalid) (Anwar)

    Problem clarity and importance


    Problem defining

    Different aspect of problems

    Availability of similar projects to


    analysis
    Availability of renewable energy
    resources
    Natural environment surrounding
    the location
    Variety of location options suitable for
    the project
    Location

    Infra Structure

    Future expansion possibility

    Ease of accessibility

    Impact on quality of life


    User experience

    ‫نسبة الفئات العمرية المخدومة‬

    Targeted audience percentage

    Total of 60 51 42 35 53
    1
    THANK YOU

    You might also like