Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Popula: What Is Better For The Planet?
Popula: What Is Better For The Planet?
Popula: What Is Better For The Planet?
W h a t i s b e t t e r f o r t h e p l a n e t ?
•Long before 10 000 BC, we were nothing but hunter
gatherers, so basically we were hunting animals as a
source of food.
Hunter Industrial
Gatherers Stone Age Iron Age Black Death Revolution World War II
Before 10 000 BC From 10 000 BC to 3300 Around 1200 BC In 1348 AD In 1760 AD From 1939-1945 AD
BC
Benefits of less
NOTE:
population: If you really think about it, less
- A decrease in deforestation population doesn't really have a
- More resources disadvantage :)
- Animals won't lose their habitats
- Less slums
All these benefits improve daily life VERY much
• Less deforestation:
• - More water in the air for the soil
• - Global warming decreases
• More Resources:
• - People wouldn't die of famine/drout
• - Greater quantities of amenities can be produced
• Habitats:
• - Less population would need less land, so animals would have their own habitats
• - A lot of species would not go extinct due to habitat loss
• Slums: (Because of a lot of population, some people are forced to live in tightly packed houses)
• - People wouldn't die because of health hazards
• - There would be a decrease in environmental degradation (The process in which the natural environment is compromised)
What is Better?
Continents Population
Asia 4.6 Billion
Africa 1.3 Billion
Europe 750 Million
North America 590 Million
South America 430 Million
Oceania 43 Million
Anatartica 0 :(
Most population to
least population
Lastly
Conclusion
Famine/Drout: Famine is the lack of food and rout is the lack of water
𝕭𝖞:
𝕭𝖞: 𝕰𝖘𝖍𝖆𝖑
𝕰𝖘𝖍𝖆𝖑 𝖆𝖓𝖉
𝖆𝖓𝖉 𝕱𝖆𝖎𝖟𝖆
𝕱𝖆𝖎𝖟𝖆
START OF SLIDE:
List of the funniest
teachers in school
Never mind, end of slide ;-;