Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decisiones Cap18
Decisiones Cap18
Decisiones Cap18
18-1
18
Activity Resource Usage Model And
Tactical Decision Making
18-2
• Incluye en el costo del producto todos los costos de la función
productiva, independientemente de su comportamiento fijo o
variable.
Es el más utilizado para tomar decisiones en empresas Latino
Americanas
GIF f i j o
19-5
18-5
Pág..834
Pág..834
Measuring Profit 4
Absorption-Costing
Absorption-CostingIncome
IncomeStatement
Statementfor
forLasersave,
Lasersave,
Inc.,
Inc.,for
forAugust
August
19-6
Measuring Profit 4
Absorption-Costing
Absorption-CostingIncome
IncomeStatement
Statementfor
forLasersave,
Lasersave,
Inc.,
Inc.,for
forSeptember
September
19-7
Measuring Profit 4
Variable-Costing
Variable-CostingIncome
IncomeStatements
Statements for
for
Lasersave,
Lasersave,Inc.
Inc.
19-8
Measuring Profit 4
Comparative
ComparativeIncome
IncomeStatements
Statementsfor
forLasersave,
Lasersave,Inc.
Inc. for
forthe
the
Month
Monthof
ofOctober
October
19-9
Measuring Profit 4
Comparative
ComparativeIncome
IncomeStatements
Statementsfor
forLasersave,
Lasersave,Inc.
Inc. for
forthe
the
Month
Monthof
ofOctober
October
Producción
Producción1250
1250yyse
sevenden
venden1300
1300
19-10
Tactical Decision Making 1
Decision
DecisionModel:
Model: Tactical
TacticalDecision-Making
Decision-MakingProcess
Process
Example
Step 1 What to do with small, ill-shaped apples.
Continued
Continued
18-11
Tactical Decision Making 1
Step 3 Bagged alternative:
a. Revenue $1.30 per bag
($0.26 per pound)
b. Cost $0.05 per pound
Applesauce alternative:
a. Revenue: $0.78 per can
($0.65 per pound)
b. Cost: $0.40 per pound
Step 4
Bagged
Applesauce
Revenue $0.26 $0.65
Cost 0.05 0.40
Net benefit $0.21 $0.25
Bagged: Differentiation
Continued Applesauce: Forward integration
Continued
18-12
Tactical Decision Making 1
Step 5 Select bagging alternative because it is
profitable and is more consistent with
strategic positioning desired by
producer.
18-13
Relevant Costs and Revenues 2
Relevant
Relevantcosts
costsarearefuture
futurecosts
coststhat
thatdiffer
differ
across
acrossalternatives.
alternatives. AAcost
costmust
mustnotnotonly
onlybebe
aafuture
futurecost
costbut
butmust
mustalso
alsodiffer
differbetween
between
alternatives.
alternatives.
18-14
Relevant Costs and Revenues 2
18-15
Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity
Resource Usage Model 3
Flexible
Flexible resources
resources cancanbe
beeasily
easily
purchased
purchasedininthe
theamount
amount needed
needed
and
andat
atthe
thetime
timeofofuse…
use… like
like
electricity.
electricity.
18-16
Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity
Resource Usage Model 3
Flexible
FlexibleResources
Resources
18-17
Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity
Resource Usage Model 3
Committed
Committedresources
resourcesare
are
purchased
purchasedbefore
beforethey
theyare
are
used,
used,such
suchas
assalaried
salaried
employees.
employees.
18-18
Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity
Resource Usage Model 3
18-19
Relevancy, Cost Behavior, and the Activity
Resource Usage Model 3
18-20
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Make or Buy
Keep or Drop
Special Order
Sell or Process Further
Important:
Important:Short-term
Short-termPerspective
Perspective
18-21
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Make-or-Buy Decisions
Talmage Company produces a
mechanical part used in one of its
engines. (Talmage produces engines for
snowblowers.) An outside supplier has
offered to sell a part (Part 34B) for $4.75.
The company normally produces 100,000
units of the part each year.
18-22
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Functional-Based
Functional-BasedMake-or-Buy
Make-or-Buy
Analysis:
Analysis: Talmage
TalmageCompany
Company
18-23
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
ABC
ABCSegmented
SegmentedIncome
IncomeStatement
Statement
DROP? 18-24
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
ABC
ABCKeep-or-Drop
Keep-or-DropAnalysis
Analysis
18-25
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Special-Order Cost
Polarcreme, Inc., an ice-cream
company, is operating at 80 percent
of its 20 million half-gallon capacity.
A distributor from another
geographically area offered to buy 2
million units of premium ice cream at
$1.75 per unit. They have agreed to
provide their own label and pay
transportation costs. This sale would
avoid a sales commission.
Precio normal unitario $2.50
18-26
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Special-Order Cost
Variable costs:
Dairy ingredients $0.70
Sugar 0.10
Flavoring 0.15
Direct labor 0.25
Packaging 0.20
Commissions 0.02
Distribution 0.03
Other 0.05
Which costs Total unit-level costs $1.50
$1.45
are irrelevant?
18-27
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Special-Order Cost
The nonunit-level variable costs will also be
incurred, producing a total increment cost of
$304,000 or $0.152 per unit (for an order of
2 million units). Revenue per unit of $1.75,
less the unit-level variable cost ($1.45) plus
the nonunit-level variable cost ($0.152)
provides a net benefit of $0.148 per unit.
Thus Polarcreme’s profit would increase by
$296,000 ($0.148 x 2,000,000).
18-28
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Sell or Process Further
Joint products have common processes and costs of
production up to a split-off point.
The point of separation is called the split-off point.
Assume that Delrio can sell hot sauce for $1.50 per
bottle. Also, assume that additional processing costs
amount to $1,000. The total revenue at split-off for
Grade A tomatoes are $400 ($0.40 x 1,000 pounds). If
the Grade A tomatoes are processed into hot sauce, the
total revenues are $1,500 ($1.50 per bottle).
18-29
Illustrative Examples of Tactical
Decision Making 4
Sell or Process Further
Differential Amount
18-30
End of
Chapter 18
18-31