Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Fec Project Canvas

    Uploaded by

    2K20EE102 Gaurav
    6 views1 page
    1) The document discusses negotiation preparation between the Government of India and various Naga groups regarding the political status of Nagaland. 2) Key stakeholders include the Nagas people, Government of India, neighboring states of Nagaland, local forces, and local people. There is often conflict in decision making between these groups. 3) The document outlines interests, options, legitimacy concerns, and commitments that need to be addressed through respectful communication, transparency, and engaged listening during the negotiation process. Meeting logistics and clearly documenting issues are also important.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    fec project canvas

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) The document discusses negotiation preparation between the Government of India and various Naga groups regarding the political status of Nagaland. 2) Key stakeholders include the Nagas people, Government of India, neighboring states of Nagaland, local forces, and local people. There is often conflict in decision making between these groups. 3) The document outlines interests, options, legitimacy concerns, and commitments that need to be addressed through respectful communication, transparency, and engaged listening during the negotiation process. Meeting logistics and clearly documenting issues are also important.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    6 views1 page

    Fec Project Canvas

    Uploaded by

    2K20EE102 Gaurav
    1) The document discusses negotiation preparation between the Government of India and various Naga groups regarding the political status of Nagaland. 2) Key stakeholders include the Nagas people, Government of India, neighboring states of Nagaland, local forces, and local people. There is often conflict in decision making between these groups. 3) The document outlines interests, options, legitimacy concerns, and commitments that need to be addressed through respectful communication, transparency, and engaged listening during the negotiation process. Meeting logistics and clearly documenting issues are also important.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Negotiation Preparation

    People Who? Process How?


    Communication
    Stakeholders & Relationships 1) Respectful for each others feelings and
    1. Nagas people struggles
    2. Government of India 2) Should be transparent
    3. Neighboring states of Nagaland 3) Engaged listening is important
    4. Forces
    5. local people
    6. Generally there is conflict in decision
    making Logistics
    1) Meet at a place that does not reflect power
    dynamics - not at management office
    2) Make sure there are enough
    representations from both sides
    3) Documentation of issues to be carried

    Problem What?
    Government of India side Together Nagas side

    Interests
    . Interests
    Options  To ensure smooth
    • Must negotiate with all the factions and groups of the Insurgents 
     Government of India don’t want to
    • Should lead to social and political harmony, economic operations
    lose Nagaland, because sensitive
    geopolitical location; extremely
    prosperity and protection of the life and property
    • Maximum decentralisation of powers to the tribal heads  Profitability to ensure
    diverse nature of its population with
    different cultural, linguistic, religious, and minimum centralisation at the apex level sustainability
    and historical background makes this • Greater autonomy for the Naga inhabited areas in these
    region characteristically different from states can be provided  Precedents against
    the rest of the country. strikes & unionization
     Maximum decentralization of  Not incur extra cost
    powers to the tribal heads and due to firing/hiring
    minimum centralization at the apex
    level.
     Greater autonomy for the Naga
    Legitimacy  They want Recognition of
    inhabited areas in these states can be • Govt. agreed the demands of .
    Naga sovereignty,
    provided which would encompass
    separate budget allocations for the
    Nagaland integration of all Naga-
    Naga inhabited areas with regard to • Article 371A:- guaranteeing Naga speaking areas into a
    Greater Nagaland, Separate
    their culture and development issues . customary laws will honoured Constitution and Separate
    • NSCN not continue attacks against Flag.
    army

    Alternatives Alternatives
    Alternaties
    Commitment • Initially demanded for
    • Formed military rule
    in Nagaland • Build an agreement between central autonomy within India
    government and Nagas • Demand for separate
    . country
    .
    • Dispute resolution mechanism • Strike & violence
    • Insurgency
    .
    • Guidelines for Human Resources

    You might also like